Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 83–96 | Cite as

The labor of terroir and the terroir of labor: Geographical Indication and Darjeeling tea plantations

Article

Abstract

In 1999, Darjeeling tea became India’s first Geographical Indication (GI). GI has proliferated worldwide as a legal protection for foods with terroir, or “taste of place,” a concept most often associated with artisan foods produced by small farmers in specific regions of the Global North. GI gives market protection to terroir in an increasingly homogenous food system. This article asks how Darjeeling tea, grown in an industrial plantation system rooted in British colonialism, has become convincingly associated with artisan GIs such as Champagne, Cognac, and Roquefort. The answer lies in a conceptual dyad that frames how British colonial officials, the Indian state, and international consumers have understood Darjeeling and its signature commodity. Since the colonial era, these actors have conceived Darjeeling as both an idyllic “garden” space and an industrial “plantation” space. As I show through an analysis of GI marketing materials and interviews with planters, pluckers, and consumers, this dyad maps in surprising ways onto labor relations. While planters’ and marketers’ discourses tend to emphasize the “garden,” laborers’ investment in GI lies primarily in an active—if also ambivalent—embrace of the plantation, encapsulated in the Nepali word “kamān.”

Keywords

Labor Plantation Terroir Tourism Tea India 

Abbreviations

AOC

Appellation d’origine côntrolée

DTA

Darjeeling Tea Association

GI

Geographical Indication

TRIPS

Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

References

  1. Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn, J. 2006. The perfect tea break. Condé Nast Traveler August: 69–70.Google Scholar
  3. Boisard, P. 2003 [1992]. Camembert: A national myth. Trans. Richard Miller. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, S. 2010. Development from within? The potential for geographic indications in the global South. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13(2): 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, S. 2011. The importance of place: Re-territorialising embeddeness. Sociologica Ruralis 51(4): 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen, S., and M.S. Gaytán. 2012. The paradox of protection: National identity, global commodity chains, and the tequila industry. Social Problems 59(1): 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, P. 2001. A time for tea: Women, labor, and post/colonial politics on an Indian plantation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colman, T. 2008. Wine politics: How governments, environmentalists, mobsters, and critics influence the wines we drink. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Doane, M. 2007. The political economy of the ecological native. American Anthropologist 109(3): 452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doane, M. 2010. Relationship coffees: Structure and agency in the fair trade system. In Fair trade and social justice: Global ethnographies, ed. S. Lyon, and M. Moberg, 229–257. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dozey, E.C. 1922. A concise history of the Darjeeling district since 1835. Calcutta: R.N. Mukherjee.Google Scholar
  14. Darjeeling Tea Association (DTA). 2001. Darjeeling tea: A Geographical Indication [Film].Google Scholar
  15. Darjeeling Tea Association (DTA). n.d. Overwhelm your senses. Kolkata.Google Scholar
  16. Government of India (GOI). 2013. State wise registration details of G.I. applications 15th September, 2003–31st March, 2013. New Delhi: Geographical Indications Registry. Intellectual Property India. http://ipindia.nic.in/girindia/. Accessed 28 May 2013.
  17. Government of India (GOI). 1999. The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. No. 48 of 1999. New Delhi: Ministry of Law, Justice, and Company Affairs (Legislative Department).Google Scholar
  18. Gross, M. 2007. High tea, India style. New York Times October 14: 51.Google Scholar
  19. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guthman, J. 2007. The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39(3): 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guy, K.M. 2003. When champagne became French. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Guy, K.M. 1997. Wine, work, and wealth: Class relations and modernization in the champagne wine industry, 1870–1914. Business and Economic History 26(2): 298–303.Google Scholar
  23. Guy, K.M. 2011. Silence and savoir-faire in the marketing of products of the terroir. Modern & Contemporary France 19(4): 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handler, R., and W. Saxton. 1988. Dyssimulation: Reflexivity, narrative, and the quest for authenticity in “living history”. Cultural Anthropology 3(3): 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heath, D., and A. Meneley. 2007. Techne, technoscience, and the circulation of comestible commodities: An introduction. American Anthropologist 109(4): 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobsbawm, E. 1983. Inventing traditions. In The invention of tradition, ed. E. Hobsbawm, and T. Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hobsbawm, E., and T. Ranger (eds.). 1983. The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kloppenburg, J., J. Hendrickson, and G.W. Stevenson. 1996. Coming into the foodshed. Agriculture and Human Values 13(3): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laudan, R. 2004. Slow food: The French terroir strategy and culinary modernism. Food, Culture & Society 7(2): 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyon, S. 2011. Coffee and community: Maya farmers and fair trade markets. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meneley, A. 2004. Extra virgin olive oil and slow food. Anthropologica 46: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meneley, A. 2007. Like an extra virgin. American Anthropologist 109(4): 678–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meneley, A. 2008. Oleo-signs and quali-signs: The qualities of olive oil. Ethnos 73(3): 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mintz, S. 1985. Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Newman & Company. 1900. Newman’s guide to Darjeeling and its surroundings, historical & descriptive, with some account of the manners and customs of the neighbouring hill tribes. London: W.H. Allen and Company.Google Scholar
  36. Paxson, H. 2006. Artisanal cheese and economies of sentiment in New England. In Fast food/slow food: The cultural economy of the global food system, ed. R. Wilk, 201–218. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  37. Paxson, H. 2010. Locating value in artisan cheese: Reverse engineering terroir for new-world landscapes. American Anthropologist 112(3): 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paxson, H. 2012. The life of cheese: Crafting food and value in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rao, C. N. 2005. Geographical Indications in Indian context: A case study of Darjeeling tea. Economic and Political Weekly October 15: 4545–4550.Google Scholar
  40. Roseberry, W. 1996. The rise of yuppie coffees and the reimagination of class in the United States. American Anthropologist 94(4): 762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tea Board of India. n.d. DarjeelingThe best: A quest for intellectual property rights. Kolkata.Google Scholar
  42. Terrio, S.J. 2000. Crafting the culture and history of French chocolate. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Trubek, A.B. 2008. The taste of place: A cultural journey into terroir. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Trubek, A.B., and S. Bowen. 2008. Creating the taste of place in the United States: Can we learn from the French? GeoJournal 73: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trubek, A.B., K.M. Guy, and S. Bowen. 2010. Terroir: A French conversation with a transnational future. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 14(2): 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ulin, R.C. 1995. Invention and representation as cultural capital: Southwest French winegrowing history. American Anthropologist 97(3): 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiss, B. 2011. Making pigs local: Discerning the sensory character of place. Cultural Anthropology 26(3): 438–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. West, P. 2012. From modern production to imagined primitive: The social world of coffee from Papua New Guinea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, J. 1998. Terroir: The role of geology, climate, and culture in the making of French wines. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. World Intellectual Property Rights Organization (WIPO). 2011. Managing the challenges of the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights: Darjeeling tea. http://www.wipo.int/ipadvantage/en/details.jsp?id=2540. Accessed 23 Feb 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations