If they come, we will build it: in vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations
- 1.5k Downloads
According to recent literature in the sociology of expectations, expectations about the future are “performative” in that they provide guidance for activities, attract attention, mobilize political and economic resources, coordinate between groups, link technical and social concerns, create visions, and enroll supporters. While this framework has blossomed over the past decade in science and technology studies, it has yet to be applied towards a more refined understanding of how the future of the modern agrofood system is being actively contested and understood. I seek to redress this gap by using the sociology of expectations to explain the discursive topography surrounding in vitro meat, a nascent agrofood technology whereby processed meat products are developed from stem cells as opposed to live animals. In discussing the obstacles and challenges which confront the proponents of this technology, I utilize three key concepts from the sociology of expectations: (1) hype, (2) retrospective prospects, and (3) the role of myth, metaphor, and ideology. I find that despite sluggish results and financial setbacks, the controversial legacy of previous agrofood technologies, and persistent cultural skepticism, the core ideological justifications for in vitro meat have proven to be resilient in buoying the technology through rough discursive waters.
KeywordsIn vitro meat Agrofood Sociology of expectations Technology Discourse Stakeholders
This article would not have been made possible without the generous feedback and comments from Jack Kloppenburg and Daniel Kleinman. The author would also like to thank Harvey James, the three anonymous reviewers, Mike Bell, Susan Squier, Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney, Susan Lederer, The University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Community and Environmental Sociology, and all of those who participated in the study. Any errors or omissions are the author’s alone.
- Armaza-Armaza, E.J., and J. Armaza-Galdos. 2010. Legal and ethical challenges regarding edible in vitro meat production. In Global food security: Ethical and legal challenges, ed. C.M. Romeo-Casabona, L. San Epifanio, and A. Cirión, 513–520. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Beardsworth, A., and T. Keil. 1997. Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Belasco, W. 2006. Meals to come: A history of the future of food. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Best, J. 2011. In-vitro meat still not on the table. Slashfood.com. http://www.slashfood.com/2011/02/01/in-vitro-meat-still-not-on-the-table/. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Boyle, A. 2012. Lab-grown hamburger due to be served up this year … for $330,000. Msnbc.com. http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/19/10449704-lab-grown-hamburger-due-to-be-served-up-this-year-for-330000?lite. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster. 2000. Introducting contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, ed. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 3–20. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Brown, N. 2003. Hope against hype—Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies 16(2): 3–21.Google Scholar
- Buttel, F.H., O.F. Larson, and G.W. Gillespie. 1990. The sociology of agriculture. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2006. Towards a new class of being—the extended body. Artnodes 6(2): 1–9.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 509–536. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Collins, N. 2011. First artificial burger to cost £250,000: Telegraph.co.uk. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8733576/First-artificial-burger-to-cost-250000.html. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Cuhls, K. 2008. Science, technology, and innovation drivers: Short report to the SCAR Expert Working Group. European Commission Standing Committee on Agricultural Research. http://ec.europa.eu/research/agriculture/scar/index_en.cfm?p=3_foresight. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- DiGregorio, S. 2008. Test tube meat? The Village Voice. http://blogs.villagevoice.com/forkintheroad/2008/04/test_tube_meat_1.php. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Driessen, C., and M. Korthals. 2012. Pig towers and in-vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design. Social Studies of Science 0: 1–24.Google Scholar
- Dryzek, J. 1997. The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ford, M. 2009. In-vitro meat: Would lab-burgers be better for us and the planet? http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/08/07/eco.invitro.meat/index.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2009.
- Geels, F.W., and W.A. Smit. 2000. Talking about the future: Metaphors of the internet. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, ed. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 109–128. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Haagsman, H.P., K.J. Hellingwerf, and B.A.J. Roelen. 2009. Production of animal proteins by cell systems: Desk study on cultured meat. Utrecht University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht. http://www.new-harvest.org/img/files/production_of_animal_proteins_1207.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Hajer, M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Harvey, F. 2011. Artificial meat could slice emissions, say scientists. Guardian.co.uk. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/20/artificial-meat-emissions. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Heselmans, M. 2005. The Dutch cultivate minced meat in a petri dish. NRC Handelsblad. http://www.new-harvest.org/article09102005.htm. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Kelland, K. 2011. Petri dish to dinner plate, in-vitro meat coming soon. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/11/us-science-meat-f-idUSTRE7AA30020111111. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.
- Ketzel, L. 2008. Lab-grown meat a reality, but who will eat it? NPR. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90235492. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Kloppenburg, J. 2004. First the seed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Loftus, J. 2011. Ten years in, lab-grown meat still stuck in its infancy. Gizmodo.com. http://gizmodo.com/5747184/ten-years-in-lab+grown-meat-still-stuck-in-its-infancy. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- McGrail, S. 2010. Nano dreams and nightmares: Emerging technoscience and the framing and (re)interpreting of the future, present and past. Journal of Futures Studies 14(4): 23–48.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Meyers, G. 2011. Raising meat in greener ways: Reuters.com. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/22/idUS402583502120110722. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Oliver, P., and H. Johnston. 2000. What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 5(1): 37–54.Google Scholar
- Omholt, S. W. 2008. The first in vitro meat symposium. The in vitro meat consortium. http://invitromeat.org/content/view/14/1/. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Osborne, A. 2008. The in vitro meat consortium preliminary economics study: eXmoor Pharma Concepts. http://www.new-harvest.org/img/files/culturedmeatecon.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Pincock, S. 2007. Meat, in vitro? The Scientist 21(9): 22.Google Scholar
- Revkin, A. 2008. Can people have meat and a planet, too? The New York Times. http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/11/can-people-have-meat-and-a-planet-too/. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Schonwald, J. 2009. Future fillet. University of Chicago Magazine 101(5): 28–31.Google Scholar
- Specter, M. 2011. Test-tube burgers. The New Yorker 87(14): 32–38.Google Scholar
- Stephens, N. 2010. In vitro meat: Zombies on the menu? SCRIPTed 7(2): 394–401.Google Scholar
- The Economist. 2006. A meaty question. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/7904194?story_id=7904194. Accessed 14 June 2012.
- Van der Weele, C. 2010. In vitro meat: Promises and responses: Cooperation between science, social research, and ethics. In Global food security: Ethical and legal challenges, ed. C.M. Romeo-Casabona, L. San Epifanio, and A. Cirión, 505–512. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- van Lente, H. 2000. Forceful futures: From promise to requirement. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, ed. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 43–64. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Welin, S., J. Gold, and J. Berlin. 2012. In vitro meat: What are the moral issues. In The philosophy of food, ed. D. Kaplan, 292–304. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Welin, S., and C. Van der Weele. 2012. Cultured meat: Will it separate us from nature? In Climate change and sustainable development: Ethical perspectives on land use and food production, ed. E. Potthast, and S. Meisch, 348–354. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Zurr, I., and O. Catts. 2003. The ethical claims of bio-art: Killing the other or self-cannibalism? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art 5(1): 167–188.Google Scholar