Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 115–128 | Cite as

Does climatic crisis in Australia’s food bowl create a basis for change in agricultural gender relations?

  • Margaret Alston
  • Kerri Whittenbury
Article

Abstract

An ongoing crisis in Australian agriculture resulting from climate crises including drought, decreasing irrigation water, more recent catastrophic flooding, and an uncertain policy environment is reshaping gender relations in the intimate sphere of the farm family. Drawing on research conducted in the Murray-Darling Basin area of Australia we ask the question: Does extreme hardship/climate crises change highly inequitable gender relations in agriculture? As farm income declines, Australian farm women are more likely to be working off farm for critical family income while men continue to work on farm often in circumstances of damaged landscapes, rising debt, and limited production. This paper examines the way gender relations are being renegotiated in a time of significant climate crisis. Our research suggests that climate crises have indeed led to changes in gender relations and that some changes are unexpected. Whereas one would logically assume that women’s enhanced economic contribution would increase their power in gender negotiations, we argue that this does not necessarily occur because their contribution is viewed as a farm survival strategy. Men are committed to prioritizing the farm and view women’s income generating work as critical to this purpose and yet, paradoxically, long for a return to traditional farm roles. We find that women are actively resisting traditional gender relations by reshaping a role for themselves beyond the farm—in the process moving physically and mentally away from a farm family ideology, questioning gender inequalities, and by extension their relationships.

Keywords

Gender Climate change Labor Tradition Resistance Family farming 

References

  1. Alston, M. 1995. Women on the land: The hidden heart of rural Australia. Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, M. 2000. Breaking through the grass ceiling: Women, power, and leadership in rural organizations. Amsterdam: Harwood Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, M. 2012. Rural male suicide in Australia. Special edition of Social Science and Medicine 74(4): 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alston, M., and J. Kent. 2006. Impact of drought on rural and remote education access: A report to DEST and Rural Education Fund of FRRR. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  5. Alston, M., and J. Kent. 2008. The big dry: Exacerbating the link between rural masculinities and poor health outcomes for rural men. Australian Journal of Sociology 44(2): 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alston, M., J. Kent, and A. Kent. 2004. Social impacts of drought: Report to NSW Agriculture. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  7. Alston, M., and K. Whittenbury. 2010. The social impacts of declining water availability and ongoing drought in the Murray-Darling Basin: Short report. Melbourne: Monash University Department of Social Work.Google Scholar
  8. Alston, M., and K. Witney-Soanes. 2008. Social impacts of drought and declining water availability in the Murray Darling Basin. Wagga Wagga: Institute of Land, Water, and Society, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2010. Year book Australia 200910. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/756B638E3405C430CA25773700169CB8. Accessed 30 November 2011.
  10. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brandth, B. 2002a. Gender identity in European family farming: A literature review. Sociologia Ruralis 42(3): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brandth, B. 2002b. On the relationship between feminism and farm women. Agriculture and Human Values 19(2): 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandth, B. 2010. Doing farm tourism: The intertwining practices of gender and work. Signs 35(2): 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, H. 2006. Real men, real locals, and real workers: Realizing masculinity in small-town New Zealand. In Country boys: Masculinity and rural life, ed. H. Campbell, M.M. Bell, and M. Finney, 87–104. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, H., M.M. Bell, and M. Finney. 2006. Masculinity and rural life: An introduction. In Country boys: Masculinity and rural life, ed. H. Campbell, M.M. Bell, and M. Finney, 1–22. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, R.W., and J.W. Messerschmidt. 2006. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19(6): 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Courtenay, W.H. 2006. Rural men’s health: Situating risk in the negotiation of masculinity. In Country boys: Masculinity and rural life, ed. H. Campbell, M.M. Bell, and M. Finney, 139–158. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dankelman, I. 2010. Introduction: Exploring gender, environment, and climate change. In Gender and climate change: An introduction, ed. I. Dankelman, 1–20. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  20. Dempsey, K. 1992. A man’s town: Inequality between women and men in rural Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Enarson, E. 2000. Gender and natural disasters. IPCRR working paper no 1. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  22. Garnaut, R. 2008. The Garnaut climate change review: Final report. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Garnaut, R. 2011. Garnaut climate change review—Update. Australia in the global response to climate change. http://www.garnautreview.org.au/update-2011/about-review.html. Accessed 5 July 2011.
  24. Gunawardena, N. 2010. Bitter cane: Gendered fields of power in Sri Lanka’s sugar economy. Signs 35(2): 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haraway, D. 1991. Simions, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Heather, B., L. Skillen, J. Young, and T. Vladicka. 2005. Women’s gendered identities and the restructuring of rural Alberta. Sociologia Ruralis 45(1–2): 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia. 2011. Of drought and flooding rains: Inquiry into the impact of the guide to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Leipins, R. 2000. Making men: The construction and representation of agriculture-based masculinities in Australia and New Zealand. Rural Sociology 65(4): 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ní Laoire, C. 2005. “You’re not a man at all!”: Masculinity, responsibility, and staying on the land in contemporary Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology 14(2): 94–114.Google Scholar
  31. O’Brien, K. 2007. Commentary to the paper of Ursula Oswald spring, climate change: A gender perspective on human and state security approaches to global security. Paper presented at the international women leaders global security summit, 15–17 November, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Pini, B., R. Panelli, and L. Dale-Hallett. 2007. The Victorian women on farms gatherings: A case study of the Australian “Women in Agriculture” movement. Australian Journal of Politics and History 53(4): 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preibisch, K.L., and E. Escalada Graz. 2010. The other side of el lotro lado: Mexican migrant women and labor flexibility in Canadian agriculture. SIGNS 35(2): 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Price, L., and N. Evans. 2006. From “as good as gold” to “gold diggers”: Farming women and the survival of British family farming. Sociologia Ruralis 46(4): 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pritchard, B., D. Burch, and G. Lawrence. 2007. Neither “family” nor “corporate” farming: Australian tomato growers as farm family entrepreneurs. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1): 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson, M. 2010. Agricultural productivity in Australia and New Zealand: Trends, constraints, and opportunities. Paper presented at Australian Agronomy conference proceedings, Food security from sustainable agriculture, ed. H. Dove and R.A. Culvenor. Proceedings of 15th agronomy conference 2010, 15–18 November 2010, Lincoln, New Zealand. http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2010/plenary/climate-change/7402_robertsonmj.htm. Accessed 30 November 2011.
  37. Shortall, S. 2006a. Economic status and gender roles. In Rural gender relations: Issues and case studies, ed. B. Bock and S. Shortall, 340–355. London: CAB International.Google Scholar
  38. Shortall, S. 2006b. Gender and farming: An overview. In Rural gender relations: Issues and case studies, ed. B. Bock, and S. Shortall, 19–26. London: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shortall, S. 2002. Gendered agricultural and rural restructuring: A case study of Northern Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis 42(2): 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stokes, C., and S.M. Howden (eds.). 2010. Adapting agriculture to climate change: Preparing Australian agriculture, forestry, and fisheries for the future. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Whatmore, S. 1991. Farming women: Gender, work, and family enterprise. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Work, Gender, Leadership, and Social Sustainability (GLASS) Research UnitMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Gender, Leadership, and Social Sustainability (GLASS) Research UnitMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations