Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 413–426 | Cite as

Linking research and public engagement: weaving an alternative narrative of Moroccan family farmers’ collective action

  • Nicolas FaysseEmail author
  • Mostafa Errahj
  • Catherine Dumora
  • Hassan Kemmoun
  • Marcel Kuper
Article

Abstract

Rural development policies are often inspired by narratives that are difficult to challenge because they are based on an apparently obvious and coherent reading of reality. Research may confront such narratives and trigger debates outside the academic community, but this can have a feedback effect and lead to a simplistic or biased posture in research. This article analyzes a research-based initiative that questioned a commonly held narrative in large-scale irrigation schemes in Morocco concerning the structural weaknesses of farmer-led collective action. This initiative conceived an alternative narrative of farmer-led collective action, based on research and actions undertaken in collaboration with the farmers. The article assesses to what extent it was possible to design this narrative and to draw on it to orient research activities, actions with farmers and public engagement, without impairing the quality of the research process. The alternative narrative was designed and diffused based on three intertwined activities: (1) the identification and analysis of farmer-led collective actions, (2) the diffusion of information on successful farmer-led collective actions especially through the production of videos, and (3) exchanges with and between local farmers’ organizations. The alternative narrative that resulted from these activities emphasizes the potentialities of farmer-led collective action, and more broadly, the willingness and capabilities of many family farmers to play an active role in the governance of rural areas. The message of the alternative narrative and the distinction made between the research articles and videos in both their content and role ensured that research did not fall into simplistic or biased analyses. The alternative narrative also became a key to renewed relations between farmers and researchers and helped design training for students that pay more attention to local dynamics. In a situation in which scheme-level organizations show limited interest in reflexive enquiry, this initiative proposes some stepping stones to make it possible for changing narratives to accompany changing relations between actors.

Keywords

Collective action Farmers’ organizations Large-scale irrigation scheme Morocco Narrative Public engagement 

Abbreviations

ORMVA

Office Régional de Mise en Valeur Agricole [Regional Agricultural Development Authority]

WUA

Water users association

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was based on activities undertaken in the framework of the Wademed project, financed by the European Union, and the SIRMA project, financed by the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. We are grateful to J. Y. Jamin for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

References

  1. Akesbi, N. 2011. Le Plan Maroc Vert: Une analyse critique. In Questions d’économie marocaine, ed. Association Marocaine des Sciences Economiques, 9–48. Casablanca: Presses Universitaires du Maroc.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, R.I., and R.M. Friend. 2010. Inland capture fisheries in the Mekong and their places and potential within food-led regional development. Global Environmental Change 21(1): 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekkar, Y., M. Kuper, M. Errahj, N. Faysse, and M. Gafsi. 2009. On the difficulty of managing an invisible resource: Farmers’ strategies and perceptions of groundwater use. Field evidence from Morocco. Irrigation and Drainage 58(3): 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B. McCay, and J. Acheson. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340: 91–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. 2003. Participant objectivation. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9: 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouzidi, Z., H. Abdellaoui, N. Faysse, J.P. Billaud, M. Errahj, and M. Kuper. 2011. Dévoiler les réseaux locaux d’innovation dans les grands périmètres irrigués. Le développement des agrumes dans la plaine du Gharb au Maroc. Cahiers Agricultures 1–2: 34–39.Google Scholar
  7. Bouzidi, Z., N. Faysse, M. Errahj, and M. Kuper. 2009. L’action collective en grande hydraulique au centre d’un nouveau régime d’action. Test d’une méthode de repérage et de qualification de l’action collective dans le périmètre du Gharb. In Proceedings of the fourth regional workshop of the SIRMA Project, eds. T. Hartani, A. Douaoui, and M. Kuper. Mostaganem, Algeria, 26–28 May 2008. http://hal.cirad.fr/docs/00/36/64/79/PDF/11_Bouzidi.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  8. Burawoy, M. 2005. For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70: 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon, M. 1999. Ni intellectuel engagé, ni intellectuel dégageé: La double stratégie de l’attachement et du détachement. Sociologie du travail 41: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumora, C., N. Faysse, M. Errahj, and M. Kuper. 2010. La longue route vers l’autonomie: Apprentissages chemin faisant à travers la formation d’un réseau d’Organisations Professionnelles Agricoles au Maroc. Paper presented at the Symposium on Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, 28 June–1 July, Montpellier. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/54/56/53/PDF/Dumora_La_longue_route.pdf.
  11. Edelman, M. 2009. Synergies and tensions between rural social movements and professional researchers. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edmunds, D., and E. Wollenberg. 2001. A strategic approach to multistakeholder negotiations. Development and Change 32(2): 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El Gueddari, A. 2004. Economie d’eau en irrigation au Maroc: Acquis et perspectives d’avenir. Hommes, Terre et Eau 130: 4–7.Google Scholar
  14. Errahj, M., M. Kuper, N. Faysse, and M. Djebbara. 2009. Finding a way to legality: Local coordination modes and public policies in large-scale irrigation schemes in Algeria and Morocco. Irrigation and Drainage 58(3): 358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ersten, M.W. 2006. Colonial irrigation: Myths of emptiness. Landscape Research 31(2): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faysse, N. 2006. Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi–stakeholder platforms. Natural Resources Forum 30: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faysse, N., M. Errahj, M. Kuper, and M. Mahdi. 2010. Learning to voice? The evolving roles of family farmers in the coordination of large-scale irrigation schemes in Morocco. Water Alternatives 3(1): 48–67.Google Scholar
  18. Ferguson, J. 1994. The anti-politics machine: “Development”, depoliticization, and bureaucractic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, J. 2006. Lessons from action-research partnerships: LASA/Oxfam America 2004 Martin Diskin Memorial Lecture. Development and Practice 16(1): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaventa, J. 2004. Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities. In Participation: From tyranny to transformation, ed. S. Hickey, and G. Mohan, 25–41. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. 1993. New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  23. Goldberg, A., and A. van der Berg. 2009. What do public sociologists do? A critique of Burawoy. Canadian Journal of Sociology 34(3): 765–802.Google Scholar
  24. Hale, C.R. 2008. Introduction. In Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship, ed. C.R. Hale, 1–29. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hammoudi, A. 1997. Master and disciple: The cultural foundations of Moroccan authoritarianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hastrup, K., and P. Elsass. 1990. Anthropological advocacy: A contradiction in terms? Current Anthropology 31(3): 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hmimidi, R. 2004. Contribution à la recherche d’une méthodologie de redynamisation des associations d’usagers de l’eau agricole dans le périmètre des Doukkala. Masters thesis. Meknes, Morocco: Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture.Google Scholar
  28. Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a campesino. Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  29. Kadiri, Z., M. Kuper, N. Faysse, and M. Errahj. 2009. Local transformation of a state-initiated institutional innovation: The example of Water Users’ Associations in an irrigation scheme in Morocco. Irrigation and Drainage 58(3): 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kadiri, Z., M. Tozy, and M. Errahj. 2010. L’eau d’irrigation et les élections communales au Moyen Sebou: L’association des irrigants comme espace de compétition politique. In Elections au Maroc entre partis et notables (2007–2009), ed. M. Tozy, 199–228. Casablanca: Najah el Jadida.Google Scholar
  31. Kuper, M. 2011. Des destins croisés: Regards sur 30 ans de recherché en grande hydraulique. Cahiers Agricultures 20(1–2): 16–23.Google Scholar
  32. Kuper, M., M. Errahj, N. Faysse, P. Caron, M. Djebbara, and H. Kemmoun. 2009a. Autonomie et dépendance des irrigants en grande hydraulique: Observations de l’action organisée au Maroc et en Algérie. Nature Sciences Sociétés 17: 248–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuper, M., S. Bouarfa, M. Errahj, N. Faysse, A. Hammani, T. Hartani, S. Marlet, A. Zairi, A. Bahri, A. Debarh, P. Garin, J.Y. Jamin, and B. Vincent. 2009b. A crop needs more than a drop: Towards a new praxis in irrigation management in North Africa. Irrigation and Drainage 58: 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuper, M., M. Dionnet, A. Hammani, Y. Bekkar, P. Garin, and B. Bluemling. 2009c. Supporting the shift from state water to community water: Lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecology and Society 14(1): 19.Google Scholar
  35. Layadi, A., N. Faysse, and C. Dumora. 2011. Les organisations professionnelles agricoles locales, partenaires pour renforcer le dialogue technique? Une expérience avec des éleveurs de bovins au Maroc. Cahiers Agricultures 20(5): 428–433.Google Scholar
  36. Latour, B. 1994. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leeuwis, C. 2000. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change 31: 931–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leeuwis, C., and N. Aarts. 2011. Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17(1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, T.M. 2011. Rendering society technical: Government through community and the ethnographic turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In Adventures in Aidland: The anthropology of professionals in international development, ed. D. Mosse, 57–79. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  41. Merrey, D.J., R. Meinzen-Dick, P.P. Mollinga, and E. Karar. 2007. Policy and institutional reform: The art of the possible. In Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, ed. D. Molden, 193–232. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  42. Melrose, M.J. 2001. Maximizing the rigor of action research: Why would you want to? How could you? Field Methods 13(2): 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mendez, J.B. 2008. Globalizing scholar activism opportunities and dilemmas through a feminist lens. In Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship, ed. C.R. Hale, 136–163. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Molle, F. 2008. Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insight from the water sector. Water Alternatives 1(1): 131–156.Google Scholar
  45. Mollinga, P.P. 2008. Water, politics and development: Framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Alternatives 1(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
  46. Mollinga, P.P. 2010. The material conditions of a polarized discourse: Clamours and silences in critical analysis of agricultural water use in India. Journal of Agrarian Change 10(3): 414–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture and Sea Fishery. 2008. Plan Maroc Vert. [Green Morocco Plan]. http://www.vulgarisation.net/Plan_Maroc_Vert.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
  48. Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture and Sea Fishery. 2010. Plan agricole régional de la région du Ghrab-Chrarda Bni-Hssen. http://www.ada.gov.ma/documentation/documentation-agence-developpement-agricole-maroc.php. Accessed January 2011.
  49. Mosse, D. 1999. Colonial and contemporary ideologies of ‘community development’: The case of tank irrigation development in South India. Modern Asian Studies 33(2): 303–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nederlof, E.S. 2007. Lessons for farmer-oriented research: Experiences from a West African soil fertility management project. Agriculture and Human Values 24(3): 369–387.Google Scholar
  51. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Olivier de Sardan, J.P. 2005. Anthropology and development: Understanding contemporary social change. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  53. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perennes, J.J. 1993. L’eau et les hommes au Maghreb: Contribution à une politique de l’eau en Méditerranée. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
  55. Pieroni, P., M. Galli, and G. Brunori. 2003. Montemagno stories: Narratives and videos as tools to facilitate reconstruction of sustainable localities. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 9(1): 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poncet, J., M. Kuper, and J. Chiche. 2010. Wandering off the paths of planned innovation: The role of formal and informal intermediaries in a large-scale irrigation scheme in Morocco. Agricultural Systems 103(4): 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roe, E. 1999. Except Africa: Remaking development, rethinking power. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Röling, N., and M. Maarleveld. 1999. Facing strategic narratives: An argument for interactive effectiveness. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sater, J.N. 2010. Morocco: Challenges to tradition and modernity. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Scoones, I. 2005. Governing technology development: Challenges for agricultural research in Africa. IDS Bulletin 36(2): 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scoones, I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scott, M. 2008. Managing rural change and competing rationalities: Insights from conflicting rural storylines and local policy making in Ireland. Planning Theory & Practice 9(1): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott, J., and G. Marshall (eds.). 2009. A dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shah, T. 1995. Making farmers’ cooperatives work. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Sraïri, T., M. Kuper, and P.Y. Le Gal. 2011. Accompagnement d’exploitations laitières pour mieux valoriser l’eau d’irrigation dans la plaine du Tadla au Maroc. Cahiers Agricultures 20(1–2): 60–66.Google Scholar
  66. Speed, S. 2006. At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist 108(1): 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tandia, A., and H. Calas. 2009. Plan Maroc Vert: Nouveau départ pour l’agriculture. Conjoncture 903: 25–35.Google Scholar
  68. Theesfeld, I. 2004. Constraints on collective action in a transitional economy: The case of Bulgarian’s irrigation sector. World Development 32(2): 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Turner, J.H. 2005. Is public sociology such a good idea? The American Sociologist 36: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Upton, C. 2008. Social capital, collective action and group formation: Developmental trajectories in post-socialist Mongolia. Human Ecology 36: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Faysse
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mostafa Errahj
    • 2
  • Catherine Dumora
    • 3
  • Hassan Kemmoun
    • 4
  • Marcel Kuper
    • 5
  1. 1.CIRAD, G-EAU Research UnitEcole Nationale d’Agriculture de MeknèsMeknesMorocco
  2. 2.Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture de MeknèsMeknesMorocco
  3. 3.Université Cadi AyyadMarrakechMorocco
  4. 4.MeknesMorocco
  5. 5.CIRAD, G-EAU Research UnitInstitut agronomique et vétérinaire Hassan IIRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations