Genetically-engineered crops and their effects on varietal diversity: a case of Bt eggplant in India
- First Online:
- 445 Downloads
Building on the evidence from the impact of hybrid technology on varietal diversity loss, this paper explores ex ante the possible effects of introduction of Bt eggplant on on-farm varietal diversity of eggplant. The public–private partnership involved in the development and introduction of Bt eggplant provides a great opportunity to develop locally-adapted Bt open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) instead of having a limited number of generic hybrid varieties. The study shows that introduction of multiple Bt OPVs by public institutions will reduce the rate of replacement of OPVs by hybrids and thus help in conserving varietal diversity. However, the cost of developing multiple Bt OPVs is high; hence policy makers need to look at alternative measures to maintain the varietal diversity of crops such as eggplant in its centers of diversity.
KeywordsBt transgenic crops Genetically engineered crops Public–private partnership Varietal diversity India
Eggplant shoot and fruit borer
Genetic use restriction technology
Research and development
United States Agency for International Development
Willingness to pay
- Briol, E., E.R. Villalba, and M. Smale. 2007. Farmer preferences for Milpa diversity and genetically modified maize in Mexico: a latent class approach. IFPRI discussion paper 00726. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Chaudhary, B., and Gaur, K. 2009. The development and regulation of Bt brinjal in India (eggplant/aubergine). Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. Brief No. 38. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/38/download/isaaa-brief-38-2009.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2010.
- Cooper, D., R. Vellve, and H. Hobbelink. 1992. Growing diversity: genetic resources and local food security. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
- Dhandapani, N., U.R. Shelkar, and M. Murugan. 2003. Bio-intensive pest management in major vegetable crops: an Indian perspective. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 1: 330–339.Google Scholar
- Huang, J., R. Hu, C. Fan, C. Pray, and S. Rozelle. 2002. Bt cotton benefits, costs, and impacts in China. Agbioforum 5(4): 153–166.Google Scholar
- Kataria, A. S. 2005. Development of F1 hybrid in vegetable crops and the availability in public and private sector. Available at http://www.seedassociationofindia.com.paperbysai.asp.
- Kolady, D.E., and W. Lesser. 2006. Who adopts what kind of technologies? The case of Bt eggplant in India. Agbioforum 9(2): 94–103.Google Scholar
- Kolady, D.E., and W. Lesser. 2008a. Potential welfare benefits from the public-private partnerships: a case of GE Eggplant in India. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 6(3 and 4): 333–340.Google Scholar
- Krishna, V.V., and M. Qaim. 2008. Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers’ health in India. Agricultural Economics 38: 167–180.Google Scholar
- MANAGE. 2002. Seed business: Indian scenario. Spice 1(2). http://www.scribd.com/doc/19837646/Seed-Business-Indian-Scnerio. Accessed 1 November 2010.
- National Horticulture Board (NHB). 2008. Production statistics of vegetables in India, 2007–2008. http://nhb.gov.in/statistics/area-production-statistics.html. Accessed 1 November 2010.
- Ramaswami, B. 2002. Understanding the seed industry: contemporary trends and analytical issues. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(3): 417–429.Google Scholar
- Reiss, M.J., and R. Straughan. 2001. Improving nature? The science and ethics of genetic engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sianesi, B., and D. Ulph. 1998. Species loss through the genetic modification of crops: a policy framework. CSERGE Working paper GEC 98-25, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1998_25.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2009.
- Sidhu, A. S. 1998. Current status of vegetable research in India. http://www.agrsci.unibo.it/wchr/wc2/asv.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2009.
- Soleri, D., D.A. Cleveland, F. Aragon Cuevas, L.H. Rios, L.M.R. Funtes, and S.H. Sweeney. 2005. Understanding the potential impact of transgenic crops in traditional agriculture: maize farmers’ perspective in Cuba, Guatemala, and Mexico. Environment and Biosafety Research 4: 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steinbrecher, R. 1996. From green revolution to gene revolution: the environmental risks of genetically engineered crops. Ecologist 26: 240–273.Google Scholar