Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 379–390

The visibility of women’s work for poverty reduction: implications from non-crop agricultural income-generating programs in Bangladesh

Article

Abstract

This article explores mechanisms for making poor rural women’s work visible by drawing on Amartya Sen’s intra-family “cooperative conflict” theory to explain the workings of two Bangladesh non-governmental organization’s income-generating programs (rearing poultry and rearing silkworms). On the assumption that cooperation surpasses conflict in the intra-family relations when women’s work is visible, the article identifies factors that influence intra-family conflict and cooperation. At entry, cooperation in a family depends on how successfully the family can make women’s income-generating activities compatible with their existing household responsibilities and with continuation of the male breadwinner’s income source. In women’s continuing work, the level of cooperation depends greatly on the amount and frequency of women’s income and the family’s level of indebtedness. Families with a male breadwinner having a regular income source tended to offer a more cooperative environment to women’s work than those with a breadwinner involved in casual labor. Women’s work as a second regular income source can make their work more visible and contribute to their families’ upward mobility.

Keywords

Bangladesh Cooperative conflict Intra-family relations Non-governmental organization Poultry Rural poverty Sericulture Women’s work 

Abbreviations

IG

Income generating

IIRD

Institute of Integrated Rural Development

NGO

Non-governmental organization

Tk

Taka (unit of currency Bangladesh)

References

  1. Agarwal, B. 1997. “Bargaining” and gender relations: within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics 3 (1): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhury, I.A., and I. Matin. 2002. Dimensions and dynamics of microfinance membership overlap—a micro study from Bangladesh. Small Enterprise Development 13 (2): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2004. Country profile 2004 Bangladesh. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
  4. Goetz, A.M., and R.S. Gupta. 1996. Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development 24 (1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hart, G. 1995. Gender and household dynamics: Recent theories and their implications. In Critical issues in Asian development: Theories, experiences and policies, ed. M.G. Quibria, 39–74. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hashemi, S.M., S.R. Schuler, and A.P. Riley. 1996. Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development 24 (4): 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hulme, D., and P. Mosley. 1996. Finance against poverty, vol. 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hunt, J., and N. Kasynathan. 2001. Pathways to empowerment? Reflections on microfinance and transformation in gender relations in South Asia. Gender and Development 9 (1): 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IIRD (Institute of Integrated Rural Development). 2001. Socio-economic characteristics of poultry rearers—a case of Dhunot Project. Dhaka: IIRD.Google Scholar
  10. IIRD. 2003. Socio-economic characteristics of broiler rearers (an internal baseline survey). Dhaka: IIRD.Google Scholar
  11. Kabeer, N. 1994. Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Kabeer, N. 2003. Gender mainstreaming in poverty eradication and the millennium development goals. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  13. Makita, R. 2007. Livelihood diversification and landlessness in rural Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Paul, B.K. 1992. Female activity space in rural Bangladesh. The Geographical Review 82 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogaly, B. 1996. Micro-finance evangelism, ‘destitute women’, and the hard selling of a new anti-poverty formula. Development in Practice 6 (2): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Safilios-Rothschild, C. 1990. Socio-economic determinants of the outcomes of women’s income-generation in developing countries. In Women, employment and the family in the International Division of Labour, ed. S. Stichter and J.L. Parpart, 221–228. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sarker, P.C., and F.Y. Rina. 1991. Family types, authority structure and women’s participation in rural development in Bangladesh. South Asian Studies (Lahore, Pakistan) 8 (2): 13–23.Google Scholar
  18. Schuler, S.R., S.M. Hashemi, and S.H. Badal. 1998. Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes? Development in Practice 8 (2): 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sen, A.K. 1990. Gender and cooperative conflicts. In Persistent inequalities: Women and world development, ed. Irene Tinker, 123–149. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sinha, S., and I. Matin. 1998. Informal credit transactions of micro-credit borrowers in rural Bangladesh. IDS Bulleting 29 (4): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeller, M., M. Sharma, A.U. Ahmed, and S. Rashid. 2001. Group-based financial institutions for the rural poor in Bangladesh: An institutional- and household-level analysis. Washington: International Food Policy Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated Research System for Sustainability ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations