Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 163–167 | Cite as

Lessons learned from pesticide drift: a call to bring production agriculture, farm labor, and social justice back into agrifood research and activism

Article

Abstract

I use the case of pesticide drift to discuss the neoliberal shift in agrifood activism and its implications for public health and social justice. I argue that the benefits of this shift have been achieved at the cost of privileging certain bodies and spaces over others and absolving the state of its responsibility to ensure the conditions of social justice. I use this critical intervention as a means of introducing several opportunities for strengthening agrifood research and advocacy. First, I call for increased critical attention to production agriculture and the regulatory arena. Second, I call for increased attention to ‘social justice’ within the food system, emphasizing the need to rekindle research on the immigrant farm labor force.

Keywords

Agriculture Agrifood activism Farm labor Pesticide drift Social justice 

References

  1. Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, M. Goodman, and K. Warner. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2008. Privatizing farm worker justice: regulating labor through voluntary certification and labeling. Geoforum (in press).Google Scholar
  5. DuPuis, E.M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go “home” to eat? Towards a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman, D., and M. Goodman (2007). Localism, livelihoods and the ‘post-organic’: changing perspectives on alternative food networks in the United States. In Alternative food geographies: representation and practice, eds. D. Maye, L. Holloway, and M. Kneafsey, 23–28. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, J. 2004. Invisible people, invisible places: connecting air pollution and pesticide drift in California. In Smoke and mirrors: the politics and culture of air pollution, ed. E.M. DuPuis, 288–304. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harrison, J. 2006. ‘Accidents’ and invisibilities: scaled discourse and the naturalization of regulatory neglect in California’s pesticide drift conflict. Political Geography 25: 506–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrison, J. 2008. Abandoned bodies and spaces of sacrifice: pesticide drift activism and the contestation of neoliberal environmental politics in California. Geoforum (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Hinrichs, C. 2003. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lappe, A., and B. Terry. 2006. Grub: ideas for an urban organic kitchen. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Morris, A.W. 2008. Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Moser, B. 2006. White heat. The Nation. 4: 11–18.Google Scholar
  16. Nevins, J. 2002. Operation gatekeeper: the rise of the “Illegal Alien” and the making of the U.S.–Mexico boundary. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Parra, P., and M.J. Pfeffer. 2006. New immigrants in rural communities: the challenges of integration. Social Text 24 (3): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wright, A. 2005. The death of Ramon Gonzalez, revised edition. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rural SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonWIUSA

Personalised recommendations