Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 157–161 | Cite as

Mining for justice in the food system: perceptions, practices, and possibilities

Article

Abstract

Despite much popular interest in food issues, there remains a lack of social justice in the American agrifood system, as evidenced by prevalent hunger and obesity in low-income populations and exploitation of farmworkers. While many consumers and alternative agrifood organizations express interest in and support social justice goals, the incorporation of these goals into on-the-ground alternatives is often tenuous. Academics have an important role in calling out social justice issues and developing the critical thinking skills that can redress inequality in the agrifood system. Academics can challenge ideological categories of inquiry and problem definition, include justice factors in defining research problems, and develop participatory, problem-solving research within social justice movements. In addition, scholars can educate students about the power of epistemologies, discourse, and ideology, thereby expanding the limits and boundaries of what is possible in transforming the agrifood system. In these ways, the academy can be a key player in the creation of a diverse agrifood movement that embraces the discourse of social justice.

Keywords

Social justice Food systems Alternative agrifood institutions Local food Farm workers Organic Sustainable agriculture Public sociology Public health Consumers 

References

  1. Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, M. Goodman, and K. Warner. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: The tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, P., and C. Sachs. 2007. Women and food chains: The gendered politics of food. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, P., and J. Guthman. 2006. From ‘old school’ to ‘farm-to-school’: Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4): 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, P., C. Hinrichs. 2007. Buying into ‘buy local’: Agendas and assumptions of U.S. local food initiatives. In Constructing alternative food geographies? Representation and practice, (eds.) L. Holloway, D. Maye, and M. Kneafsy, 255–272. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  6. Basok, T., S. Ilcan, and J. Noonan. 2006. Citizenship, human rights, and social justice. Citizenship Studies 10 (3): 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bread for the World. 2004. Are we on track to end hunger? The 14th annual report on the state of world hunger. http://www.bread.org/learn/hunger-reports/are-we-on-track-to-end.html. Accessed December 10, 2007.
  8. Burawoy, M. 2005. 2004 American Sociological Association presidential address: For public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (2): 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buttel, F.H. 2000. The recombinant BGH controversy in the United States: Toward a new consumption politics of food? Agriculture and Human Values 17 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Critser, G. 2003. Fat land: How Americans became the fattest people in the world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, J. 2005. Intergroup bias and inequality: Legitimizing beliefs and policy attitudes. Social Justice Research 18 (3): 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guthman, J., A. Morris, and P. Allen. 2006. Squaring farm security and food security in two types of alternative food institutions. Rural Sociology 71 (4): 662–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutierrez, L.M. 1995. Understanding the empowerment process: Does consciousness make a difference? Social Work Research 19 (4): 229–237.Google Scholar
  14. Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16 (3): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mesny, A. 1998. Sociology for whom? The role of sociology in reflexive modernity. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 23 (2/3): 159–178.Google Scholar
  16. National Center for Farmworker Health (NCFH). 2002. Overview of America’s farmworkers. http://www.ncfh.org/aaf_02.php. Accessed 1 December 2007.
  17. Perez, J., and P. Allen. 2007. Farming the college market: Results of a consumer study at UC Santa Cruz. Center Research Brief, no. 11. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Pollan, M. 2006. The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schlosser, E. 2001. Fast food nation: The dark side of the all-American meal. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Shreck, A., C. Getz, and G. Feenstra. 2006. Social sustainability, farm labor, and organic agriculture: Findings from an exploratory analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4): 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sinclair, U. 1981. The jungle. New York: Bantam Books (Original work published 1906).Google Scholar
  22. Spurlock, M. 2004. Supersize me [video recording]. Presented by roadside attractions, Samuel Goldwyn films, and showtime films. Produced by M. Spurlock and The Con. New York, NY: Hart Sharp Video.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, Oakes Academic ServicesUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations