Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 193–196 | Cite as

The local industrial complex? Questioning the link between local foods and energy use

  • Matthew J. MariolaEmail author


Local food has become the rising star of the sustainable agriculture movement, in part because of the energy efficiencies thought to be gained when food travels shorter distances. In this essay I critique four key assumptions that underlie this connection between local foods and energy. I then describe two competing conclusions implied by the critique. On the one hand, local food systems may need a more extensive and integrated transportation infrastructure to achieve sustainability. On the other hand, the production, transportation, and consumption of local foods are fundamentally as reliant on fossil fuels as are long distance foods. A more holistic approach to energy use in the food system is needed to determine which particular sociotechnical factors optimize energetic sustainability.


Energy Fossil fuels Industrialism Local food systems Sustainability 



I appreciate the input of Jay Martin early in this paper’s life, and the later comments by Jill Harrison, Steve Wolf, and two anonymous referees.


  1. Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, M. Goodman, and K. Warner. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DuPuis, E.M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go ‘‘home’’ to eat?: Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Food Routes Network. No date. Where does your food come from? Plant your dollars close to home and watch your community grow. Accessed 26 June 2007.
  5. Gouveia, L., and A. Juska. 2002. Taming nature, taming workers: Constructing the separation between meat consumption and meat production in the US. Sociologia Ruralis 42 (4): 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halweil, B. 2002. Home grown: The case for local food in a global market. Worldwatch Paper 163. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Hinrichs, C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural markets. Journal of Rural Studies 16 (3): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hinrichs, C. 2003. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keoleian, G.A., and M.C. Heller. 2004. Life cycle-based sustainability indicators for assessment of the U.S. food system. In Proceedings from life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector, ed. N. Halberg, 190–198. Bygholm, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Lass, D., G.W. Stevenson, J. Hendrickson, and K. Ruhf. 2003. CSA across the nation: Findings from the 1999 CSA survey. Madison, WI: Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems.Google Scholar
  11. McWilliams, J.E. 2007. Food that travels well. New York Times. August 6.Google Scholar
  12. Odum, H.T. 1996. Environmental accounting, energy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Pirog, R., T.V. Pelt, K. Enshayan, and E. Cook. 2001. Food, fuel, and freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far food travels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions. Ames, IA: Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
  14. Pirog, R., and A. Benjamin. 2003. Checking the food odometer: Comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions. Ames, IA: Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
  15. Saunders, C., A. Barber, and G. Taylor. 2006. Food miles: Comparative energy/emissions performance of New Zealand’s agriculture industry. Research Report 285. Lincoln, New Zealand: Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University.Google Scholar
  16. Shuman, M. 2007. On the lamb. Accessed 12 September 2007.
  17. Simons, D., and R. Mason. (2003). Lean and green: ‘Doing more with less.’ ECR Journal 3 (1): 84–91.Google Scholar
  18. Winter, M. 2003. Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human & Community Resource DevelopmentOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations