Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 271–281 | Cite as

Crop diversification and trade liberalization: Linking global trade and local management through a regional case study

Article

Abstract

Some models anticipate that liberalized agricultural trade will lead to increased crop diversity, while other models make the opposite claim. These positions were explored in southwestern British Columbia, Canada where, between 1992 and 1998, government subsidies and other measures designed to protect horticultural farmers were lifted, exposing these farmers to foreign competition. Public hearings on the future of agriculture provided an opportunity to tap the knowledge and experience of people affected by this transition. Analysis of transcripts from these hearings, which was confirmed by industry data, shows that trade liberalization has led to the loss of the local fruit and vegetable processing industry. Stakeholders saw the loss as a major factor affecting the choice of crops grown locally. To test this assertion, crop diversity data were analyzed, differentiating crops grown for the processing industry from those grown for the fresh market. Results show that crop diversity increased for processing crops but not for fresh crops. Farmers who used to produce commodities for the fruit and vegetable processing industry seem to have been forced to find new crops to cope with the decline in the processing industry. Here then is a case where the effects of trade were indirect (they were mediated by another variable: the loss of the processing industry) and variable (they differed for the two groups of crops). This may have significant environmental implications as scientific research shows that diverse agro-ecosystems are better able to withstand pest outbreaks and require less agri-chemicals than simple systems.

Keywords

Agro-diversity British Columbia Canada Environmental impact Globalization Stakeholder perceptions Trade policy Vegetable production 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1998). The Canadian Fruit and Vegetable Processing Industry: Sub-Sector Profile. Ottawa: Food BureauGoogle Scholar
  2. Agricultural Land Commission, (1999). Transcripts from The Province of British Columbia's Standing Committee on Agriculture, February 22nd, 1999Google Scholar
  3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1999). 1998/99 Canadian vegetables: situation and tends (excluding potatoes). Government of Canada. Accessed on January 28th, 2004 http://www.agr.gc.ca/misb/hort/veg.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2000). 1999–2000 Canadian vegetable situation and trends. Government of Canada. Accessed on May 9th, 2003 at http://www.agr.gc.ca/misb/hort/vegetable_eng.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2001). The Canadian fruit and vegetable processing industry. Government of Canada. Accessed on May 8th, 2003 at http://www.agr.gc.ca/food/profiles/fruitveg/fruitveg_e.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Agriculture, Agri-Food Canada, and Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (1997). The British Columbia Food and Beverage Processing Industry. Market and Industry Services Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, New Westminster, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Agricultural Land Commission (1999). Transcripts from The Province of British Columbia’s Standing Committee on Agriculture, February 22nd, 1999Google Scholar
  8. Altieri M. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson K., Strutt A. (1996). On measuring the environmental impact of agricultural trade liberalization. In: Roe T. (eds.) Agriculture, Trade and the Environment: Discovering and Measuring Critical Linkages. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 151–172Google Scholar
  10. Andersson J. (2001). Agriculture and world trade liberalization. Socio-environmental perspectives on the common agricultural policy. Ecological Economics 36(3):534–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Artemis Agri-Strategy Group (2002). An Economic Profile of Agriculture in the Lower Mainland. Greater Vancouver Regional District, Fraser Valley Regional District and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Fisheries, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. Barisoff, W. (1998). Comments made to the select standing committee on agriculture and fisheries. Province of British Columbia. November 27th. Accessed on May 10th, 2003 at http://www.legis.gov.bc.ca/CMT/36thParl/CMT08/hansard/1998/af1127.htmGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell S., Morse S. (2004). Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: A case study relating to a “blue plan” project in Malta. Sustainable Development 12:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonilla O., May P. (1997). The environmental effects of agricultural trade liberalization in Latin America: An interpretation. Ecological Economics 22(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradshaw B. (2004). Plus c’est la meme chose? Questioning crop diversification as a response to agricultural deregulation in Saskatchewan, Canada. Journal of Rural Studies 20:25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. British Columbia Agriculture Council (2004). Presentation to the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services. British Columbia Agriculture Council. Accessed on February 4th, 2004 at http://www.bcac.bc.ca/Presentations_Detail.asp?ID=18Google Scholar
  17. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (1999). Field Vegetable Production. Government of British Columbia, Victoria, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Connor J., Shiek W. (1997). Food Processing: An Industrial Powerhouse in Transition. Wiley-Interscience Publications, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Corbin J., Strauss A. L. (1990). Grounded theory research – procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delta Farmland and Wildlife Trust (2000). Farmland and Wildlife; Grassland Set-Asides (Fact Sheet #2). Delta: DFWTGoogle Scholar
  21. Ervin D. (1997). Agriculture, Trade afsnd the Environment: Anticipating Policy Changes. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans C. (1999). Select Standing Committee on Agriculture and Fisheries in British Columbia. Government of British Columbia, Victoria, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Faber M., Manstetten R., Proops J. L. R. (1995). On the conceptual foundations of ecological economics: A teleological approach. Ecological Economics 12(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ference and Weicker, Ltd. (2000). Overview of the processed food and beverage industry in British Columbia. Accessed on September 25th, 2000 at www.fwco.com/foodproc.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Figge F. (2002). Managing Biodiversity Correctly. Efficient Portfolio Management as An Effective Way of Protecting Species. Gerling, Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  26. Figge F. (2004). Applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(4):827–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraser E., Mabee W., Slaymaker O. (2003). Mutual dependence, mutual vulnerability: The reflexive relation between society and the environment. Global Environmental Change 13:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fraser E. (2004). Land tenure and agricultural management: Soil conservation on rented and owned fields in southwest British Columbia. Agriculture and Human Values 21:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedland W., Barton A., Thomas R. (1981). Manufacturing Green Gold: Capital, Labour, and Technology in the Lettuce Industry. Cambridge University Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedland W. (1994). The global fresh fruit and vegetable system: An industrial organization analysis. In: McMichael P. (eds.) The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp.173–189Google Scholar
  31. Geertz C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures; Selected Essays. Basic Books, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Pub. Company, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  33. Government of Canada (1999). Agricultural Economic Statistics. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  34. Government of Canada (1995). An Economic Overview of Farm Incomes by Farm Types. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  35. Hernández M., Maya A. (2002). Globalization and pork raising in Mexico: The challenges of integration in the world market. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 10(2):25–31Google Scholar
  36. Hespanha P. (1997). The dynamics of globalization: Social crises and conflict in Portuguese rural areas. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 6:11–24Google Scholar
  37. Higgins L., Jussaume R. (1998). The viability of niche marketing within global commodity chains: An example from beef. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 7:45–66Google Scholar
  38. Hoff K., Stiglitz J. (2001). Modern economic theory and development. In: Stiglitz J. (eds.) The Future of Development Economics in Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 389–459Google Scholar
  39. Homer-Dixon, T. (1995) Strategies for studying causation in complex ecological political systems. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science and the University of Toronto. Accessed on March 20, 2002 at␣http://www.library.utoronto.ca/pcs/eps/method/methods1.htmGoogle Scholar
  40. Industry Canada (1999). Strategis trade statistics. Government of Canada. Accessed on January 25, 2006 at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrkti/tdst/engdoc/tr_homep.htmlGoogle Scholar
  41. Kloppenburg J., Lezberg S., De Master K., Stevenson G. W., Hendrickson J. (2000). Tasting food tasting sustainability: Defining the attributes of an alternative food system with competent, ordinary people. Human Organization 59(2):177–186Google Scholar
  42. Kneen B. (1999). Farmageddon: Food and the Culture of Biotechnology. New Society, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  43. Kneen, B., C. McDougall, and C. Kneen (1999). A baseline for food policy in British Columbia. Farm Folk City Folk. Accessed on March 22, 1999 at http://www.ffcf.bc.ca/baseline.htmlGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsden T. (1998). Agriculture beyond the treadmill? Issues for policy, theory and research practice. Progress in Human Geography 22(2):265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCalla A., Josling T. (1985). Agricultural Policies and World Markets. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. McClurg S. (2000). Water and the Shaping of California. Water Education Foundation and Heyday Books, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  47. Morse S., McNamara N., Acholo M., Okwoli B. (2001). Sustainability indicators: The problem of integration. Sustainable Development 9:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (1999). Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  49. Panayotou T. (1993). Green Markets. International Center for Economic Growth, The Harvard Institute for International Development, and The Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  50. Pannell D. J., Glenn N. A. (2000). A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics 33(1):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paoletti M., Pimentel D., Stinner B., Stinner D. (1992). Agroecosystem biodiversity: Matching production and conservation biology. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 40:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parsons B. (2000). Organic Practices Establish a Clear Market Position. Vista on the Agri-food Industry and the Farm Community (A Statistics Canada Newsletter). Government of Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  53. Pierce J. (1993). Agricultural sustainability and the imperatives of policy reform. Geoforum 24(4):381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Potter C. (2000). Agriculture, trade, and the environment. Environment 42(2):40Google Scholar
  55. Ramos-Martin J. (2003). Empiricism in ecological economics: A perspective from complex systems theory. Ecological Economics 46(3):387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reed M. S., Dougill A. J. (2002). Participatory selection process for indicators of rangeland condition in the Kalahari. The Geographical Journal 168:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scholte K. (1992). Effect of crop rotation on the incidence of soil-borne fungal diseases of potato. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Supplement 2:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Select Standing Committee on Agriculture and Fisheries (2000). First Report. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: The Government of British Columbia, 4th sessionGoogle Scholar
  59. Shiva V. (1993). Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. Zed Books, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  60. Statistics Canada (1998) Fruit and Vegetable Production Statistics. Catalogue # N22-003sxpb. Government of Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  61. Stinner D., Stinner B., Martsolf E. (1997). Biodiversity as an organizing principle in agroecosystem management: Case studies of holistic resource management practitioners in the USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 62:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stoll S. (1998). The Fruits of Natural Advantage: Making the Industrial Countryside in California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  63. Thirsk J. (1997). Alternative Agriculture: A History. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  64. Tisdell C. (2003). Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: Analysis and assessment. Ecological Economics 45(3):365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Umaerus V. (1992). Crop rotation in relation to crop protection. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Supplement 2:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winson A. (1992). The Intimate Commodity. Garamond Press, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  67. Winters L., N. McCulloch, and A. McKay (2002). Trade liberalization and poverty: The empirical evidence. CREDIT Research Paper No. 02/22. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations