Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 395–410 | Cite as

Determinants of Agricultural Intensity Index “Scores” in a Frontier Region: An Analysis of Data from Northern Guatemala



Data on farming systems in Petén, Guatemala, were used to develop an agricultural intensity index. The index can be used to assign an intensity “score” to a given farming system based on the array of practices used by the farmer, each practice’s contribution to production intensity, and the scale at which these practices are used. The scores assigned to 118 farmers in three study areas in Petén were analyzed through analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify the factors that account for the variation in intensity levels, as measured through the index. The analyses reveal that the factors influencing agricultural intensity in Petén vary greatly from one study area to the next. This is due to differences in livelihood opportunities and strategies that, in turn, affect how agriculture fits into the local economy and how and why intensification is pursued. Variation in intensity levels can best be understood by considering the factors at the household and sub-regional scales that influence (a) whether farmers feel a need to intensify, (b) whether they see some benefit in doing so, and (c) whether they have the resources required to intensify production through particular strategies. Close attention must be paid to these factors by conservation and development organizations seeking to influence land use patterns and conserve forest in Petén.


Adoption Agrotechnologies Deforestation Farming systems Guatemala Intensification Land use Petén 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AHT/APESA (Agrar-Und Hydrotechnik y Asesoria y Promocion Economica S.A.) (1992). Plan de Desarrollo Integrado del Petén, Vol. I: Diagnostico General del Petén (Integrated Development Plan of the Petén, Vol. I: General Diagnostic of the Petén). Peten, Guatemala: AHT/APESAGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, S. S. 1980

    Decision making and policy making in rural development

    Barlett, P. eds. Agricultural Decision Making: Anthropological Contributions to Rural DevelopmentAcademic PressNew York, New York321335
    Google Scholar
  3. Binswanger, H. P.Ruttan, V. eds. 1978Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions, and DevelopmentJohns Hopkins University PressBaltimore, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  4. Boserup, E. 1965The Conditions of Agricultural GrowthAldineChicago, IlliniosGoogle Scholar
  5. Boserup, E. 1981Population and TechnologyBlackwellOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, N. C. 1996“Alternatives to slash-and-burn: A global imperative”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment58311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookfield, H. C. 1962“Local study and comparative method: An example from central New Guinea”Annals of the Association of American Geographers52242254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookfield, H. C., Hart, D. 1971Melanesia: A Geographical Interpretation of an Island WorldMethuenLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, P., Podelofsky, A. 1976“Population density, agricultural intensity, land tenure and group size in the New Guinea highlands”Ethnology15211238Google Scholar
  10. Buckles, D., Triomphe, B., Sain, G. 1998Cover Crops in Hillside Agriculture: Farmer Innovation with MucunaInternational Development Research CentreOttawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpentier, C. L., Vosti, S. A., Witcover, J. 2000“Intensified production systems on western Brazilian Amazon settlement farms: Could they save the forest?”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment827388Google Scholar
  12. Chayanov, A. 1966 [1925]

    The Theory of Peasant Economy

    Thorner, D.Smith, R. E. F.Kerblay, B. eds. English TranslationRichard D. Irwin Inc.Homewood, Illinois
    Google Scholar
  13. Cochran, W. G. 1963Sampling Techniques2John Wiley and SonsNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Collinson, M. P. 1972Farm Management in Peasant Agriculture: A Handbook for Rural Development Planning in AfricaPraegerNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook, O. F. 1916“Staircase farms of the ancients”National Geographic Magazine29493Google Scholar
  16. Dobbs, T. T., Foster, P. 1972“Incentives to invest in new agricultural inputs in north India”Economic Development and Cultural Change21101117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fearnside, P. M. 1987“Rethinking continuous cultivation in Amazonia”Bioscience37209214Google Scholar
  18. Fearnside, P. M. (1999). “Can pasture intensification discourage deforestation in the Amazon and Pantanal regions of Brazil?” Paper presented at the Conference on Patterns and Processes of Land Use and Forest Change in the Amazon, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, March 23–26Google Scholar
  19. Fortmann, L. 1988

    Tree tenure factors in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa

    Fortmann, L.Bruce, J. W. eds. Whose Trees: Proprietary Dimensions of ForestryWestview PressBoulder, Colorado1633
    Google Scholar
  20. Foster, A. D., Rosenzweig, M. R., Behrman, J. R. 1997Population growth, income growth, and deforestation: Management of village common land in IndiaEconomics Departments, Brown University, Rhode Island, and University of PennsylvaniaMimeographGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujisaka, S. 1994“Learning from six reasons why farmers do not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture”Agricultural Systems46409425Google Scholar
  22. Godoy, R. A. 1992“Determinants of smallholder commercial tree cultivation”World Development20713725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godoy, R. A., O’Neill, K., Groff, S., Kostishack, P., Cubas, A., Demmer, J., McSweeney, K., Overman, J., Wilkie, D., Brokaw, N., Martinez, M. 1997“Household determinants of deforestation by Amerindians in Honduras”World Development25977987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldman, A. C., Smith, J. 1995“Agricultural innovation in three areas of Kenya: Neo-Boserupian Theories and Regional Characterization”Economic Geography694471Google Scholar
  25. Grunberg, G., Ramos, V. H. 1998Base de Datos Sobre Población, Tierras y Medio Ambiente en la Reserva de la Biosfera Maya (Data Base on Population, Land and Environment in the Maya Biosphere Reserve)CARE/CONAPPetén, GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V. 1987

    Population and agricultural productivity

    Epenshade, T.Stolnitz, G. eds. AAAs Selected Symposium No. 103 Westview PressBoulder, Colorado1119
    Google Scholar
  27. Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A. 1998Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A ReviewCentre for International Forestry ResearchBogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Kates, R. W., Hyden, G., Turner, B. L.,II 1993

    Theory, evidence, study design

    Turner,  eds. Population Growth and Agricultural Change in AfricaUniversity Press of FloridaGainesville, Florida
    Google Scholar
  29. Latinoconsult (1974). Estudio de Factibilidad de un Programa de Desarrollo de la Ganadería en el Departamento del Petén (Feasibility Study of a Ranching Development Program in the Department of the Petén), Guatemala City, GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  30. Manger-Cats, S. (1966). Land Tenure and Economic Development in Guatemala. PhD dissertation. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortiz, S. 1973Uncertainties in Peasant Farming: A Colombian CaseAthlone PressNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Perz, S. G. 2003“Social determinants and land use correlates of agricultural technology adoption in a forest frontier: A case study in the Brazilian Amazon”Human Ecology31133165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rostow, W. W. 1960The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist ManifestoCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanchez, P. A. 1994

    Alternatives to slash and burn: A pragmatic approach for mitigating tropical deforestation

    Anderson, J. R. eds. Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International CommunityCAB InternationalLondon, UK451479
    Google Scholar
  35. Sanders, W. T. 1977

    Environmental heterogeneity and the␣evolution of lowland Maya civilization

    Adams, R. E. W. eds. The Origins of Maya Civilization AlbequerqueUniversity of New Mexico PressNew Mexico287297
    Google Scholar
  36. Serrao, E. A., Toledo, J. M. 1990

    The search for sustainability in Amazon pastures

    Anderson, A. B. eds. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon RainforestColumbia University PressNew York, New York195214
    Google Scholar
  37. Shriar, A. J. (1999). Agricultural Intensification and Resource Conservation in the Buffer Zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Petén, Guatemala. PhD dissertation. Gainesville, Florida: University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  38. Shriar, A. J. 2000“Agricultural intensity and its measurement in frontier regions”Agroforestry Systems49301318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shriar, A. J. 2001“The dynamics of agricultural intensification and resource conservation in the buffer zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Petén, Guatemala”Human Ecology292748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shriar, A. J. 2002“Food security, land use, and deforestation in northern Guatemala”Food Policy27395414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simmons, C. S., Tarano, J. M., Pinto, J. H. 1959Clasificación de los Suelos de la República de Guatemala (Soil Classification of the Republic of Guatemala). Ministerio de Educación PublicaGuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, C. A. 1975

    Production in western Guatemala: A test of Von Thunen and Boserup

    Plattner, S. eds. Formal Methods in Economic AnthropologyAmerican Anthropological AssociationWashington DC537
    Google Scholar
  43. Smith, N. J. H. 1990“Strategies for sustainable agriculture in the tropics”Ecological Economics2311323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Srivastava, J. P., Smith, N. J. H., Forno, D. A. 1996Biodiversity and Agricultural Intensification: Partners for Development and Conservation The World BankWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Stockton, D. 1987

    Measuring land degradation

    Blaikie, P.Brookfield, H. eds. Land Degradation and SocietyMethuenLondon, UK4963
    Google Scholar
  46. Tivy, J. 1990Agricultural EcologyLongman ScientificNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, II B. L., Ali, A. M. S. 1996“Induced intensification: agricultural change in Bangladesh with implications for Malthus and Boserup”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA9314,98414,991Google Scholar
  48. Turner, B,L.,IIBrush, S.B. eds. 1987Comparative Farming SystemsThe Guilford PressNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner, B. L.,II, Doolittle, W. E. 1978“The concept and measure of agricultural intensity”The Professional Geographer30297301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thunen, J. 1966Isolated State: An English Version of Der Isolierte StattPergamon PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban and Regional Planning Program, L.D. Wilder School of Government and Public AffairsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations