Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 39–52 | Cite as

Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale

  • Ika Darnhofer
  • Walter  Schneeberger
  • Bernhard Freyer
Article

Abstract

Reasons for converting to organic farming have been studied in a number of instances. However, the underlying rationale that motivates the behavior is not always made clear. This study aims to provide a detailed picture of farmers’ decision-making and illustrate the choice between organic and conventional farm management. Based on 21 interviews with farmers, a decision-tree highlighting the reasons and constraints involved in the decision of farmers to use, or not to use, organic production techniques was formulated. The accuracy of the decision-tree was tested through a written survey of 65 randomly sampled farmers. The decision-tree permits the identification of decision criteria and examines the decision-making process of farmers in choosing their farming method. It also allows for the characterization of farmer strategies and values, identifying five types of farmers: the “committed conventional;” the “pragmatic conventional;” the “environment-conscious but not organic;” the “pragmatic organic;” and the “committed organic.” The importance of taking into account heterogeneity in farmers’ attitudes, preferences, and goals and their impact on the choice of a farming method is emphasized.

Keywords

Austria Decision-tree Farmer decision-making Motivation Organic farming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, E., Deary, I., Willock, J. 2001“Personality and intelligence as predictors of economic behaviour in Scottish farmers”.European Journal of Personality15123137Google Scholar
  2. Beedell, J., Rehman, T. 2000“Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviour”.Journal of Rural Studies16117127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beus, C., Dunlap, R. 1990“Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate”.Rural Sociology55590616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck, D., Getz, C., Guthman, J. 1997“From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California”.Sociologia Ruralis37320Google Scholar
  5. Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T. 1999“Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK”.Journal of Agricultural Economics504763Google Scholar
  6. Darnhofer, I., Gretzmacher, R., Schneeberger, W. 1997“Modelling farmers’ decisions: A comparison between HDM and CART for oats-vetch adoption in the Ethiopian Highlands”.Die Bodenkultur48271280Google Scholar
  7. Darnhofer, I., Eder, M., Schneeberger, W. 2003“Modellrechnungen zur Umstellung einer Ackerbauregion auf Biolandbau” (Estimating the economic impact of the conversion of a cash-crop region to organic farming).Berichte über Landwirtschaft815773Google Scholar
  8. Drake, L., Bergström, P., Svedsäter, H. 1999

    “Farmers’ attitudes and uptake”

    Huylenbroeck, G. vanWhitby, M. eds. Countryside Stewardship: Farmers, Policies and MarketsElsevier ScienceAmsterdam, The Netherlands89111
    Google Scholar
  9. Duram, L. 2000“Agent’s perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors”Agriculture and Human Values173548Google Scholar
  10. Duram, L. 1999“Factors in organic farmers’ decision-making: Diversity, challenge and obstacles”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture14210Google Scholar
  11. Edwards-Jones, G., Howells, O. 2001The origin and hazard of inputs to crop protection in organic farming systems: are they sustainableAgricultural Systems673147Google Scholar
  12. Fairweather, J. 1999“Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications”Agriculture and Human Values165163Google Scholar
  13. Falconer, K. 2000“Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: A transactional perspective”Journal of Rural Studies16379394Google Scholar
  14. Franzel, S. 1984“Modeling farmers’ decisions in a farming systems research exercise: The adoption of an improved maize variety in Kirinyaga District, Kenya”Human Organization43199207Google Scholar
  15. Franzel, S., Coe, R., Cooper, P., Place, F., Scherr, S. J. 2001“Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in sub-Saharan Africa”.Agricultural Systems693762Google Scholar
  16. Freyer, B. 1998“Umfrage zum umweltgerechten Landbau in den Kantonen BL und BS”(Survey on environmentally friendly agriculture in the cantons of BL and BS). Agrarforschung5329332Google Scholar
  17. Gladwin, C. 1976“A view of the Plan Puebla: An application of hierarchical decision models”American Journal of Agricultural Economics58881887Google Scholar
  18. Gladwin, C. 1989aEthnographic Decision-tree ModellingSageSage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 19. Beverly Hills, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladwin, C. 1989b“Indigenous knowledge systems, the cognitive revolution and agricultural decision-making”Agriculture and Human Values63241Google Scholar
  20. Guthman, J. (2000). Agrarian Dreams? The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Häfliger, M., Maurer, J. 1996“Umstellung auf Biolandbau–Motivation und Hemmnisse”.(Conversion to organic farming–Motivations and obstacles). Agrarforschung3531534Google Scholar
  22. Hall, A., Mogyorody, V. 2001“Organic farmers in Ontario: An examination of the conventionalization argument”.Sociologia Ruralis41399322Google Scholar
  23. Hollenberg, K., R. Siebert, and H. Kächele (1999). “Determinanten für die Umstellungsbereitschaft landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter in Brandenburg auf Ökologischen Landbau.” [Determinants of the conversion-willingness of farm managers.] In H. Hoffmann and S. Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau “Vom Rand zur Mitte” (pp. 333–336). February 23–25, 1999. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Dr. Köster.Google Scholar
  24. Jansen, K. 2000“Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe”Biological Agriculture and Horticulture17247278Google Scholar
  25. P, Kaltoft. 1999“Values about nature in organic farming practice and knowledge”Sociologia Ruralis393953Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Kirchmann, H., Thorvaldsson, G. 2000“Challenging targets for future agriculture”.European Journal of Agronomy12145161Google Scholar
  28. Kirner, L. (2001). Die Umstellung auf biologischen Landbau in Österreich – Potential, Hemmnisse, Mehrkosten in der biologischen Milchproduktion. [Conversion to Organic Farming in Austria – Potentials, Obstacles and Additional Costs in Organic Dairying.] Schriftenreihe 92. Vienna, Austria: Bundesanstalt für Agrarwirtschaft.Google Scholar
  29. Kirner, L., Schneeberger, W. 2000“Bereitschaft der Marktfruchtbetriebe zur Umstellung auf biologische Wirtschaftsweise in Österreich.Analyse einer schriftlichen Befragung”. [Willingness of cash crop farms to convert to organic farming in Austria. Analysis of a written survey.]Die Bodenkultur51135142Google Scholar
  30. Lockeretz, W. 1997“Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the Northeastern United States”Biological Agriculture and Horticulture141324Google Scholar
  31. Lockeretz, W. 1999“Farm profile: Sörtorp, an organic farm in Sweden”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture143741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lohr, L., Salomonsson, L. 2000“Conversion subsidies for organic production: Results from Sweden and lessons for the United States”.Agricultural Economics22133146Google Scholar
  33. Long, N., Ploeg, J. van der 1994

    “Heterogeneity, actor and structure: Towards a reconstitution of the concept of structure”

    Booth, D. eds. Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research and PracticeLongmanHarlow, Essex, UK6289
    Google Scholar
  34. Lund, V., Hemlin, S., Lockeretz, W. 2002“Organic livestock production as viewed by Swedish farmers and organic initiators”.Agriculture and Human Values19255268Google Scholar
  35. McGregor, M., Willock, J., Dent, B., Deary, I., Sutherland, A., Gibson, G., Morgan, O., Grieve, B. 1996“Links between psychological factors and farmer decision-making”.Farm Management9228239Google Scholar
  36. McGregor, M. J., Rola-Rubzen, M. F., Murray-Prior, R. 2001“Micro and macro-level approaches to modelling decision-making”.Agricultural Systems696383Google Scholar
  37. Michelsen, J. 2001“Organic farming in a regulatory perspective The Danish case”Sociologia Ruralis416284Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, K., Murdoch, J. 2000“Organic vs.conventional agriculture: Knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain”. Geoforum31159173Google Scholar
  39. Morris, C., Potter, C. 1995“Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K”.Journal of Rural Studies115163Google Scholar
  40. Murray-Prior, R. (1994). “Farmers as scientists: A personal construct theory interpretation of hierarchical decision models.” Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Victoria University, Wellington, February 7–11, 1994. (http://www.curtin. edu.au/curtin/muresk/publications).Google Scholar
  41. Murray-Prior, R. 1998“Modelling farmer behaviour: A personal construct theory interpretation of hierarchical decision models”Agricultural Systems57541556Google Scholar
  42. Murray-Prior, R. and Wright, V. (1994). “Farmer decisions and aggregate supply: An explanation of the impact of major price changes.” Paper presented to the 38th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Victoria University, Wellington, February 7–11, 1994. (http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/muresk/publications).Google Scholar
  43. Noe, E. (1999). “Who are the organic farmers in Denmark of today?” Paper presented at the XVII Congress of the ESRS, August 24–28, 1999, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  44. Nuthall, P. L. 2001“Managerial ability a review of its basis and potential improvement using psychological concepts”Agricultural Economics24247262Google Scholar
  45. Padel, S. 2001Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation?Sociologia Ruralis414061Google Scholar
  46. Padel, S. (2002). “Studying conversion as a human activity system”. In J. Powell (ed.), UK Organic Research 2002 (pp. 101–104). Proceedings of the Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR) Conference, March 26–28, 2002, Aberystwyth, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Pietola, K., Lansink, A. 2001“Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland”.European Review of Agricultural Economics28115Google Scholar
  48. Rämisch, G. 2001“Regionale Marktchancen für Produkte des ökologischen Landbaus - dargestellt am Fallbeispiel der Region um Scheyern”[Regional marketing opportunities for organic products–a case study in the region around Scheyern.]Berichte über Landwirtschaft79212233Google Scholar
  49. Regouin, E. (2002). “To convert or not to convert to organic farming”. Paper presented at the OECD Workshop on Organic Agriculture, September 23–26, 2002, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. Rigby, D., Cáceres, D. 2001“Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems”.Agricultural Systems682140Google Scholar
  51. Rigby, D., Young, R., Burton, M. 2001“The development of and prospects for organic farming in the UK”.Food Policy26599613Google Scholar
  52. Roep, D., Bruin, R. de 1994

    “Regional marginalisation, styles of farming and technology development”

    Ploeg, J. van derLong, A. eds. Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural DevelopmentVan GorcumAssen, The Netherlands217227
    Google Scholar
  53. Schoon, B., Grotenhuis, R. Te 2000“Values of farmers, sustainability and agricultural policy”.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics121727Google Scholar
  54. Schneeberger, W., Kirner, L. 2001“Umstellung auf biologischen Landbau in Österreich”.[Conversion to organic farming in Austria.] Berichte über Landwirtschaft79348360Google Scholar
  55. Schneeberger, W., Darnhofer, I., Eder, M. 2002“Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash crop producers in Austria”.American Journal of Alternative Agriculture172431Google Scholar
  56. Schneider, R. (2001). Umstellung von Marktfruchtbetrieben im Marchfeld und Weinviertel auf die biologische Wirtschaftsweise - Umstellungshemmnisse, Umstellungsprobleme und Wirtschaftlichkeit. [Conversion to organic farming of cash crop farms in the Marchfeld and Weinviertel–Expected obstacles, encountered problems and economic considerations.] PhD Dissertation. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  57. Schulze Pals, L. 1994Ökonomische Analyse der Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau.[Economic Analysis of the Conversion to Organic Farming.] Reihe A, Heft 436, Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten.LandwirtschaftsverlagMünster, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomson, D. (2001). “Different pebbles, same pond: ‘Farming styles’ in the Loddon catchment of Victoria.” Paper presented at “Exploring beyond the boundaries of extension.” Australasia-Pacific Extension Network, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, October 3–5, 2001 (http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2001/p).Google Scholar
  59. Tovey, H. 1997“Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in Ireland”Sociologia Ruralis372137Google Scholar
  60. Trewavas, A. 2001“Urban myths of organic farming Organic farming began as an ideology, but can it meet today’s needs?” Nature410409410Google Scholar
  61. van der Ploeg, J. 1994

    “Styles of farming: An introductory note on concepts and methodology”

    Ploeg, J. van derLong, A. eds. Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural DevelopmentVan GorcumAssen, The Netherlands217227
    Google Scholar
  62. van der Ploeg, J. 2000“Revitalizing agriculture: Farming economically as starting ground for rural development”Sociologia Ruralis40497511Google Scholar
  63. Ploeg , J., Renting, H., Brunori, H., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., Roest, K., Devilla-Guzmán, E., Ventura , F. 2000“Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory”.Sociologia Ruralis40391408Google Scholar
  64. Vogel, S. (1995). “Die Umstellung auf Biologischen Landbau – Bäuerinnen und Bauern bewerten ihre Ziele und Erfahrungen im Umstellungsprozeß.” [Conversion to organic farming – farmers assess their goals and experiences during the conversion process.] In B. Freyer, B. Lehmann, W. Schneeberger, and U. Zerger (eds.), Betriebswirtschaft im biologischen Landbau (pp. 199–203). Proceedings of a conference held in Zurich, April 3–5, 1995. SÖL Sonderausgabe 57, Bad Dürkheim, Germany: SÖL.Google Scholar
  65. Ward, N. 1993“The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era”Sociologia Ruralis33348364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Willock, J., Deary, I., Edwards-Jones, G., Gibson, G., McGregor, M., Sutherland, A., Dent, J. B., Morgan, O., Grieve, R. 1999“The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision-making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland”.Journal of Agricultural Economics50286303Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, G. 1997“Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme”Journal of Environmental Management506793Google Scholar
  68. Wilson, G.A., Hart, K. 2001Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: Towards conservation-oriented thinking?Sociologia Ruralis41254274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ika Darnhofer
    • 1
  • Walter  Schneeberger
    • 1
  • Bernhard Freyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural and Forestry EconomicsViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Organic FarmingUniversity of Natural Resources and Applied Life SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations