Gender awareness in medicine: adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale to the Portuguese population (N-GAMS)
- 54 Downloads
Health care professionals’ gender awareness has been presented as a mechanism to minimize gender biases in health. The present paper aimed to adapt and validate the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS, Verdonk et al. in Sex Roles 58:222–234, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9326-x) to the Portuguese population, also addressing some limitations of its original study, namely by: (1) testing the scale’s three-fold underlying structure and (2) extending the study of its criteria-related validity, by analyzing sex-related differences in medical students’ gender awareness and the associations between gender awareness and empathy and sexism. One thousand and forty-eight medical students (Mage = 22.90; 67.1% women) filled out the Portuguese version of the N-GAMS (N-GAMS.pt) along with measures of Physician Empathy and Sexism. A Parallel Analysis and an Exploratory Factor Analysis suggested the presence of three factors. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed a good fit of the hypothesized three-factor structure: (1) gender sensitivity (n = 6 items; α = .713), (2) gender-role ideologies towards patients (n = 7 items; α = .858) and (3) gender-role ideologies towards doctors (n = 5 items; α = .837), with a positive association between the latter two (r = .570; p < .001). The N-GAMS.pt also showed good criteria-related validity. Namely, as hypothesized: (1) more empathic students reported more gender sensitivity and lower endorsement of gender-role ideologies; (2) higher hostile and benevolent sexism were associated to higher endorsement of gender-role ideologies; and (3) higher hostile sexism was associated to lower gender sensitivity. Implications of the N-GAMS for research and interventional purposes are discussed.
KeywordsGender awareness Gender sensitivity Empathy Sexism Scale development
We would like to thank Cláudia Andrade and Andreia Ferreira for their help with the forward -backward translation of the N-GAMS items and instructions, and Marta Matos and Helena Carvalho for their statistical advice. This study was carried out following the ethical and deontological guidelines of ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) and the Portuguese Board of Psychologists (Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses, 2011).
This study was funded by a Ph.D. Grant by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT/PD/BD/111187/2015) to Rita Morais, supervised by Sónia F. Bernardes and co-supervised by Petra Verdonk.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There were no financial or other relationships that lead to conflicts of interest in the development of this piece of research.
- Aguiar, P., Salgueira, A., Frada, T., & Costa M. J. (2009). Empatia Médica: tradução, validação e aplicação de um instrumento de medição. Actas do X Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia. Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (version 23.0) [computer program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. A., Oliveira, R., Pereira, H., & Leal, I. (2015). Adaptação dos inventários de Sexismo Moderno para Portugal: o inventário de Sexismo Ambivalente e oinventário de Ambivalência em relação aos Homens. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hojat, M. (2009). Ten approaches for enhancing empathy in health and human services cultures. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 31(4), 412–450.Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. Released. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Maroco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações. Report Number Lda: Pêro Pinheiro.Google Scholar
- Miller, P., Vogt, L., King, J., & King, D. (1999). Gender ideology, sensitivity and knowledge: A model of gender awareness in VA health care. Veterans Health System Journal, 4, 27–30.Google Scholar
- Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses. (2011). Código Deontológico [Brochura]. Lisboa: OPP.Google Scholar
- Poinhos, R. (2011). Viés de Género na Medicina. Acta Médica Portuguesa, 24, 975–986.Google Scholar
- PORDATA. (2019). Alunos matriculados no ensino superior na área da Saúde: total, por área de educação e formação e sexo. [On-line]. Retirado de https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Alunos+matriculados+no+ensino+superior+na+%C3%A1rea+da+Sa%C3%BAde+total++por+%C3%A1rea+de+educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o+e+forma%C3%A7%C3%A3o+e+sexo-802.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit o structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–27.Google Scholar
- Stangor, C., & Leary, S. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 243–283.Google Scholar
- Swann, W. B., Jr., Langlois, J. H., & Gilbert, L. A. (Eds.). (1999). Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Wei, Y.-C., George, N. I., Chang, C.-W., & Hicks, K. A. (2017). Assessing sex differences in the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality per increment in systolic blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies in the United States. PLoS ONE, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar