Advertisement

Disentangling residents’ engagement with communities of clinical practice in the workplace

  • Francisco M. Olmos-VegaEmail author
  • Diana H. J. M. Dolmans
  • Carlos Guzmán-Quintero
  • Camila Echeverri-Rodriguez
  • Pim W. Teunnissen
  • Renée E. Stalmeijer
Article

Abstract

Maximising the potential of the workplace as a learning environment entails understanding the complexity of its members’ interactions. Although some articles have explored how residents engage with supervisors, nurses and pharmacists individually, there is little research on how residents enter into and engage with the broader community of clinical practice (CoCP). To this end, we designed a constructivist grounded theory study that took place at Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá, Colombia. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 residents from different training levels and disciplines during the first weeks of their new rotations. During the interviews, we used the Pictor technique as a visual aid to collect data. Using iterative data collection and analysis, constant comparison methods and theoretical sampling, we constructed the final results. When entering a CoCP, residents experienced recurring and intertwined processes including: exploring how their goals and interest are aligned with those of the CoCP; identifying the relevant CoCP members in the workplace environment; and understanding how these members could assist their successful engagement with the community’s practices. Residents entered a CoCP with the intention of either having a central or a peripheral trajectory in it. The final resident participation and role resulted from negotiations between the resident and the CoCP members. Optimising workplace learning includes being mindful as to how each member of the healthcare team influence residents’ engagement on practice, and on understanding the nuances of residents’ participatory trajectories while interacting with them. Understanding such nuances could be key to align CoCPs’ learning affordances and residents’ goals and intentions.

Keywords

Communities of practice Co-participation theory Interprofessional collaboration Postgraduate medical education Workplace learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank to all the residents that kindly accepted to participate in this study and to Jeannette Suarez for helping us transcribing all the interviews. We also thank to Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, who funded all this study.

References

  1. Balmer, D., Serwint, J., & Ruzek, S. (2008). Understanding paediatric resident-continuaty preceptor relationships trhough the lens of apprenticeship learning. Medical Education, 42(9), 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannister, S. L., Dolson, M. S., Lingard, L., & Keegan, D. A. (2018). Not just trust: Factors influencing learners’ attempts to perform technical skills on real patients. Medical Education, 52(6), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkhout, J. J., Helmich, E., Teunissen, P. W., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Jaarsma, A. D. (2017). How clinical medical students perceive others to influence their self-regulated learning. Medical Education, 51(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J., Nestel, D., Clement, T., & Goldszmidt, M. (2017). The supervisory encounter and the senior GP trainee: managing for, through and with. Medical Education, 52(2), 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2013). Flux, questions, exclusion and compassion: collective learning in secondary care. Medical Education, 47(12), 1197–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burford, B., Morrow, G., Morrison, J., Baldauf, B., Spencer, J., Johnson, N., et al. (2013). Newly qualified doctors’ perceptions of informal learning from nurses: Implications for interprofessional education and practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(5), 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Clement, T., Brown, J., Morrison, J., & Nestel, D. (2016). Ad hoc supervision of general practice registrars as a ‘community of practice’: Analysis, interpretation and re-presentation. Advances Health Sciences Education, 21(2), 415–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Mecklin, J. P. (2010). Promoting inter-professional teamwork and learning—The case of a surgical operating theatre. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cristancho, S. (2015). Eye opener: Exploring complexity using rich pictures. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(3), 138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y. (2018). Medicine as a community of practice: Implications for medical education. Academic Medicine, 93(2), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egan, T., & Jaye, C. (2009). Communities of clinical practice: The social organization of clinical learning. Health, 13(1), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Brigham, L., Jones, S., & Smith, A. (2014). Students at the academic workplace boundary: Tourist and sojourners in practice-based education. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 43–63). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, A. W. (2010). Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuller, A. (2007). Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice. In J. Huges, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 17–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Gergen, K. (2009). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gillespie, B. M., Gwinner, K., Chaboyer, W., & Fairweather, N. (2013). Team communications in surgery—Creating a culture of safety. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(5), 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldman, J., Reeves, S., Wu, R., Silver, I., MacMillan, K., & Kitto, S. (2015). Medical residents and interprofessional interactions in discharge: An ethnographic exploration of factors that affect negotiation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(10), 1454–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helmich, E., Cristancho, S., Diachun, L., & Lingard, L. (2017). ‘How would you call this in English? Being reflective about translations in international, cross-cultural qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(2), 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. London: Sage publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2013). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. King, N., Bravington, A., Brooks, J., Hardy, B., Melvin, J., & Wilde, D. (2013). The Pictor technique: A method for exploring the experience of collaborative working. Qualitative Health Research, 23(8), 1138–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learining: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lingard, L., McDougall, A., Levstik, M., Chandok, N., Spafford, M. M., & Schryer, C. (2012). Representing complexity well: A story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Medical Education, 46(9), 869–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lingard, L., Sue-Chue-Lam, C., Tait, G. R., Bates, J., Shadd, J., Schulz, V., et al. (2017). Pulling together and pulling apart: Influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(5), 1085–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McMurtry, A., Rohse, S., & Kilgour, K. (2016). Socio-material perspectives on interprofesional team and collaborative learning. Medical Education, 50(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noble, C., Brazil, V., Teasdale, T., Forbes, M., & Billett, S. (2017). Developing junior doctors’ prescribing practices through collaborative practice: Sustaining and transforming the practice of communities. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(2), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olmos-Vega, F., Dolmans, D., Guzmán-Quintero, C., Stalmeijer, R., & Teunissen, P. W. (2018). Unravelling residents’ and supervisors’ workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study. Accepted for publication at Medical Education.Google Scholar
  32. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Vargas-Castro, N., & Stalmeijer, R. E. (2017). Dealing with the tension: How residents seek autonomy and participation in the workplace. Medical Education, 51, 699–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ong, C. C., Dodds, A., & Nestel, D. (2016). Beliefs and values about intra-operative teaching and learning: a case study of surgical teachers and trainees. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(3), 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paradis, E., Leslie, M., & Gropper, M. A. (2016). Interprofessional rhetoric and operational realities: An ethnographic study of rounds in four intensive care units. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(4), 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheehan, D., Jowsey, T., Parwaiz, M., Birch, M., Seaton, P., & Shaw, S. (2017). Clinical learning environments: Place, artefacts and rhythm. Medical Education, 51(10), 1049–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stalmeijer, R. (2015). Teaching in the clinical workplace: Looking beyond the power of ‘the one’. Perspectives in Medical Education, 4, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strand, P., Edgren, G., Borna, P., Lindgren, S., Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Stalmeijer, R. E. (2015). Conceptions of how a learning or teaching curriculum, workplace culture and agency of individuals shape medical student learning and supervisory practices in the clinical workplace. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(2), 531–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swanwick, T. (2005). Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: From cognitivism to ‘culturism’. Medical Education, 39(8), 859–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teunissen, P. W. (2014). Experiences, trajectories, and reifications: An emerging framework of practice-based learning in healthcare workplaces. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(4), 843–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teunissen, P. W., Boor, K., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2007a). Attending doctors´ perpectives on how residents learn. Medical Education, 41(11), 1050–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teunissen, P. W., Scheele, F., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., Boor, K., Van Luijk, S. J., et al. (2007b). How residents learn: Qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Medical Education, 41(8), 763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O’Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varpio, L., Bidlake, E., Casimiro, L., Hall, P., Kuziemsky, C., Brajtman, S., et al. (2014). Resident experiences of informal education: How often, from whom, about what and how. Medical Education, 48(12), 1220–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varpio, L., Hall, P., Lingard, L., & Schryer, C. (2008). Interprofessional communication and medical error: A reframing of research questions and approaches. Academic Medicine, 83(10 Suppl), S76–S81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watling, C., & Lingard, L. A. (2012). Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Medical Teacher, 34, 850–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014). Learning in a landscape of practice: A framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 13–29). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anaesthesiology Department, Faculty of MedicinePontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Hospital Universitario San IgnacioBogotáColombia
  3. 3.School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Anthropology Department, Social Sciences FacultyPontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia
  5. 5.VU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations