After emphasizing biomedical and clinical sciences for over a century, US medical schools are expanding experiential roles that allow students to learn about health care delivery while also adding value to patient care. After developing a program where all 1st-year medical students are integrated into interprofessional care teams to contribute to patient care, authors use a diffusion of innovations framework to explore and identify barriers, facilitators, and best practices for implementing value-added clinical systems learning roles. In 2016, authors conducted 32 clinical-site observations, 29 1:1 interviews with mentors, and four student focus-group interviews. Data were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Authors discussed drafts of the categorization scheme, and agreed upon results and quotations. Of 36 sites implementing the program, 17 (47%) remained, 8 (22%) significantly modified, and 11 (31%) withdrew from the program. Identified strategies for implementing value-added roles included: student education, patient characteristics, patient selection methods, activities performed, and resources. Six themes influencing program implementation and maintenance included: (1) educational benefit, (2) value added to patient care from student work, (3) mentor time and site capacity, (4) student engagement, (5) working relationship between school, site, and students, and, (6) students’ continuity at the site. Health systems science is an emerging focus for medical schools, and educators are challenged to design practice-based roles that enhance education and add value to patient care. Health professions’ schools implementing value-added roles will need to invest resources and strategize about best-practice strategies to guide efforts.
Undergraduate medical education Implementation science Curricular development Value-added medical education
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The project was performed with financial support from the American Medical Association (AMA) as part of the Accelerating Change in Medical Education Initiative and the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. The content of this paper reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of AMA, the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, or other participants in this Initiative. We acknowledge the clinicians in collaborating health systems for piloting educational experiences.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Gonzalo is co-editor of a textbook on Health Systems Science (Elsevier, 2016). There are no other conflicts of interest to report.
Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., O’Brien, B. C., & Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2010). Educating physicians: A call for reform of medical school and residency (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cordasco, K. M., Horta, M., Lurie, N., Bird, C. E., & Wynn, B. O. (2009). How are residency programs preparing our 21st century internists? A study conducted by staff from rand health for the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR686.html.
Gonzalo, J. D., Dekhtyar, M., Hawkins, R. E., & Wolpaw, D. R. (2017). How can medical students add value? Identifying roles, barriers, and strategies to advance the value of undergraduate medical education to patient care and the health system. Academic Medicine, 92(9), 1294–1301.Google Scholar
Gonzalo, J. D., Lucey, C., Wolpaw, T., & Chang, A. (2017c). Value-added clinical systems learning roles for medical students that transform education and health: A guide for building partnerships between medical schools and health systems. Academic Medicine,92(5), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harting, J., Rutten, G. M., Rutten, S. T., & Kremers, S. P. (2009). A qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory to examine determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists. Physical Therapy,89(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, S., Nickerson, K. G., Tenenbaum, J., Morris, T. Q., Rabinowitz, D., O’Donnell, K., et al. (1996). Compensation to a department of medicine and its faculty members for the teaching of medical students and house staff. The New England Journal of Medicine,334(3), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199601183340307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information,22(2), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar