Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 531–557 | Cite as

Conceptions of how a learning or teaching curriculum, workplace culture and agency of individuals shape medical student learning and supervisory practices in the clinical workplace

  • Pia Strand
  • Gudrun Edgren
  • Petter Borna
  • Stefan Lindgren
  • Gitte Wichmann-Hansen
  • Renée E. Stalmeijer
Article

Abstract

The role of workplace supervisors in the clinical education of medical students is currently under debate. However, few studies have addressed how supervisors conceptualize workplace learning and how conceptions relate to current sociocultural workplace learning theory. We explored physician conceptions of: (a) medical student learning in the clinical workplace and (b) how they contribute to student learning. The methodology included a combination of a qualitative, inductive (conventional) and deductive (directed) content analysis approach. The study triangulated two types of interview data from 4 focus group interviews and 34 individual interviews. A total of 55 physicians participated. Three overarching themes emerged from the data: learning as membership, learning as partnership and learning as ownership. The themes described how physician conceptions of learning and supervision were guided by the notions of learning-as-participation and learning-as-acquisition. The clinical workplace was either conceptualized as a context in which student learning is based on a learning curriculum, continuity of participation and partnerships with supervisors, or as a temporary source of knowledge within a teaching curriculum. The process of learning was shaped through the reciprocity between different factors in the workplace context and the agency of students and supervising physicians. A systems-thinking approach merged with the “co-participation” conceptual framework advocated by Billet proved to be useful for analyzing variations in conceptions. The findings suggest that mapping workplace supervisor conceptions of learning can be a valuable starting point for medical schools and educational developers working with changes in clinical educational and faculty development practices.

Keywords

Clinical supervision Clinical workplace Co-participation Sociocultural learning theory Systems thinking Workplace learning Undergraduate medical students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the physicians from Skåne University Hospitals in Lund and Malmoe and from Helsingborg General Hospital who participated in this study. Financial support was provided through the regional agreement on medical training and research (ALF) between The Skåne Regional Council and Lund University.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare for this article.

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1995). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Billett, S. (1996). Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum. Studies in Continuing Education, 18(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2010). Learning through practice: models, traditions, orientations and approaches [Electronic verison]. In S. Billett (Ed.), Professional and practice-based learning (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved December 20, 2013 from http://library.lu.se/cgibin/ipchk/http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01310a&AN=lovisa.002415746&site=eds-live.
  5. Bleakley, A. (2002). Pre-registration house officers and ward-based learning: A ‘new apprenticeship’ model. Medical Education, 36(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleakley, A. (2006). Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Medical Education, 40(2), 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boor, K., Scheele, F., van der Vleuten, C. P., Teunissen, P. W., den Breejen, E. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2008). How undergraduate clinical learning climates differ: A multi-method case study. Medical Education, 42(10), 1029–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchel, T. L., & Edwards, F. D. (2005). Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Family Medicine, 37(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
  9. Calkins, S., Johnson, N., & Light, G. (2012). Changing conceptions of teaching in medical faculty. Medical Teacher, 34(11), 902–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlgren, L, Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Hult, H., Hård af Segerstad, H., Szkudarek, T., & Kamlet, M. S. (2006). Conceptions of learning and teaching among teachers and students in higher education. A Swedish–Polish comparative study. Anthology of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 89–115). Linköping: Linköpings universitet.Google Scholar
  11. de Feijter, J. M., de Grave, W. S., Dornan, T., Koopmans, R. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: An activity theory analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(3), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolmans, D. H., Wolfhagen, I. H., Essed, G. G., Scherpbier, A. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2002). The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Academic Medicine, 77(4), 332–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A. (2007). Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Medical Education, 41(1), 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dornan, T., Scherpbier, A., King, N., & Boshuizen, H. (2005). Clinical teachers and problem-based learning: A phenomenological study. Medical Education, 39(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duvivier, R. J., Van Dalen, J., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2009). Teacher perceptions of desired qualities, competencies and strategies for clinical skills teachers. Medical Teacher, 31(7), 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2009). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenhill, J., & Poncelet, A. N. (2013). Transformative learning through longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Education, 47(4), 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hager, P. (2004). Conceptions of learning and understanding learning at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hirsh, D., Gaufberg, E., Ogur, B., Cohen, P., Krupat, E., Cox, M., et al. (2012). Educational outcomes of the Harvard Medical School–Cambridge integrated clerkship: A way forward for medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of The Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(5), 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmboe, E., Ginsburg, S., & Bernabeo, E. (2011). The rotational approach to medical education: Time to confront our assumptions? Medical Education, 45(1), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Illeris, K. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 4, 411–421.Google Scholar
  30. Kangasniemi, M., Ahonen, S., Liikanen, E., & Utriainen, K. (2011). Health science students’ conceptions of group supervision. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keating, S. (2006). Learning in the workplace: A literature review. Melbourne: Postcompulsory Education Centre, Victoria University.Google Scholar
  32. Kernan, W. N., Hershman, W., Alper, E. J., Lee, M. Y., Viscoli, C. M., Perry, J. R., et al. (2008). Disagreement between students and preceptors regarding the value of teaching behaviors for ambulatory care settings. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 20(2), 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant, J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical Teacher, 29(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knight, L. V., & Bligh, J. (2006). Physicians’ perceptions of clinical teaching: A qualitative analysis in the context of change. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2002). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning Vol 1. Perspectives on learning (pp. 111–126). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2005). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lindgren, S., Brännström, T., & Hanse, E. (2011). Medical Education in Sweden. Medical Teacher, 33(10), 798–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacDougall, J., & Drummond, M. J. (2005). The development of medical teachers: An enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers. Medical Education, 39(12), 1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mann, K. V. (2011). Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education, 45(1), 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLeod, P., Steinert, Y., & Chalk, C. (2009). Which pedagogical principles should clinical teachers know? Teachers and education experts disagree Disagreement on important pedagogical principles. Medical Teacher, 31(4), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyer, J. H. F., & Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1999). On the operationalisation of conceptions of learning in higher education and their association with students’ knowledge and experiences of their learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(3), 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Ministry of Education and Health. (2003). The act concerning the ethical review of research involving humans. 2003:460. Retrieved 9 January 2014 from http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Lag-2003460-om-etikprovning_sfs-2003-460/.
  45. Morgan, D. L. (Ed.). (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Nilsson Skyvell, M., Pennbrant, S., Pilhammar, E., & Wenestam Claes, G. (2010). Pedagogical strategies used in clinical medical education: An observational study. BMC Medical education, 10(9).Google Scholar
  47. O’Neill, P. A., Owen, A. C., McArdle, P. J., & Duffy, K. A. (2006). Views, behaviours and perceived staff development needs of doctors and surgeons regarding learners in outpatient clinics. Medical Education, 40(4), 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peeraer, G., Donche, V., De Winter, B. Y., Muijtjens, A. M. M., Remmen, R., Van Petegem, P., et al. (2011). Teaching conceptions and approaches to teaching of medical school faculty: The difference between how medical school teachers think about teaching and how they say that they do teach. Medical Teacher, 33(7), e382–e387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 557–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2008). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56(1), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 203–220.Google Scholar
  52. Pratt, D. D., Harris, P., & Collins, J. B. (2009). The power of one: Looking beyond the teacher in clinical instruction. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(6), 673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ringsted, C. (2011). Developmental aspects of medical competency and training: Issues of curriculum design. Medical Education, 45(1), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sahlén, K.G. (Producer). (2009). Open Code 3.6. [Software tool for coding qualitative data generated from text information such as interviews, observations or field notes]. Retrieved from http://www.phmed.umu.se/english/divisions/epidemiology/research/open-code/.
  56. Seabrook, M. A. (2003). Medical teachers’ concerns about the clinical teaching context. Medical Education, 37(3), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. and updated edn). London: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  58. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheehan, D., Wilkinson, T. J., & Billett, S. (2005). Interns’ participation and learning in clinical environments in a New Zealand hospital. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steinert, Y. (2010). Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice. Medical Teacher, 32(5), 425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stenfors-Hayes, T. (2011). Being and becoming a teacher in medical education. Dissertation, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  62. Stenfors-Hayes, T., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2011). What does it mean to be a good teacher and clinical supervisor in medical education? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stone, S., Ellers, B., Holmes, D., Orgren, R., Qualters, D., & Thompson, J. (2002). Identifying oneself as a teacher: The perceptions of preceptors. Medical Education, 36(2), 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Strand, P., Sjöborg, K., Stalmeijer, R., Wichmann-Hansen, G., Jakobsson, U., & Edgren, G. (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of the undergraduate clinical education environment measure (UCEEM). Medical Teacher, 5(12), 1014–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sutkin, G., Wagner, E., Harris, I., & Schiffer, R. (2008). What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 83(5), 452–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swanwick, T., & Morris, C. (2010). Shifting conceptions of learning in the workplace. Medical Education, 44(6), 538–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor, E. W., Tisdell, E. J., & Gusic, M. E. (2007). Teaching beliefs of medical educators: Perspectives on clinical teaching in pediatrics. Medical Teacher, 29(4), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teunissen, P. W., Boor, K., Scherpbier, A. J., van der Vleuten, C. P., van Diemen-Steenvoorde, J. A., van Luijk, S. J., et al. (2007a). Attending doctors’ perspectives on how residents learn. Medical Education, 41(11), 1050–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2008). Lifelong learning at work. BMJ, 336(7645), 667–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Teunissen, P. W., Scheele, F., Scherpbier, A. J., van der Vleuten, C. P., Boor, K., van Luijk, S. J., et al. (2007b). How residents learn: Qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Medical Education, 41(8), 763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. Y. Y. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development; Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  72. Trigwell, Keith, Michael, Prosser, & Fiona, Waterhouse. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996a). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996b). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams, Reed G., & Klamen, Debra L. (2006). See one, do one, teach one-exploring the core teaching beliefs of medical school faculty. Medical Teacher, 28(5), 418–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2012). Experiential learning: AMEE guide No. 63. Medical Teacher, 34(2), E102–E115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pia Strand
    • 1
  • Gudrun Edgren
    • 1
  • Petter Borna
    • 2
  • Stefan Lindgren
    • 5
  • Gitte Wichmann-Hansen
    • 3
  • Renée E. Stalmeijer
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of pediatricsSkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Teaching and Learning, School of Business and Social SciencesAarhus UniversityÅrhusDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations