Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 457–466 | Cite as

The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: educational and science-related outcomes

Article

Abstract

Biomedical preparatory programs (pipeline programs) have been developed at colleges and universities to better prepare youth for entering science- and health-related careers, but outcomes of such programs have seldom been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a matched cohort study to evaluate the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program’s Summer Residential Program (SRP), a 25-year-old university-based biomedical pipeline program that reaches out to low-income and underrepresented ethnic minority high school students. Five annual surveys were used to assess educational outcomes and science-related experience among 96 SRP participants and a comparison group of 192 youth who applied but were not selected to participate in the SRP, using ~2:1 matching on sociodemographic and academic background to control for potential confounders. SRP participants were more likely than the comparison group to enter college (100.0 vs. 84.4 %, p = 0.002), and both of these matriculation rates were more than double the statewide average (40.8 %). In most areas of science-related experience, SRP participants reported significantly more experience (>twofold odds) than the comparison group at 1 year of follow-up, but these differences did not persist after 2–4 years. The comparison group reported substantially more participation in science or college preparatory programs, more academic role models, and less personal adversity than SRP participants, which likely influenced these findings toward the null hypothesis. SRP applicants, irrespective of whether selected for participation, had significantly better educational outcomes than population averages. Short-term science-related experience was better among SRP participants, although longer-term outcomes were similar, most likely due to college and science-related opportunities among the comparison group. We discuss implications for future evaluations of other biomedical pipeline programs.

Keywords

Education Program evaluation Science Students 

Supplementary material

10459_2014_9540_MOESM1_ESM.doc (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 40 kb)

References

  1. American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx.
  2. Beck, P., Githens, J. H., Clinkscales, D., Yamamoto, D., Riley, C. M., & Ward, H. P. (1978). Recruitment and retention program for minority and disadvantaged students. Journal of Medical Education, 53(8), 651–657.Google Scholar
  3. Bediako, M. R., McDermott, B. A., Bleich, M. E., & Colliver, J. A. (1996). Ventures in education: A pipeline to medical education for minority and economically disadvantaged students. Academic Medicine, 71(2), 190–192.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, W. T., Thomson, W. A., Morrissey, C. T., Miller, L. M., & Smith, Q. W. (1991). Baylor’s program to attract minority students and others to science and medicine. Academic Medicine, 66(6), 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. California Department of Education (CDE) (2009). College-going rates and student migration.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, P. B., Wahl, E., Slater, M., Her, E., Moeller, B., Ba, H., & Light, D. (1998). Paths to success: An evaluation of the gateway to higher education program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 297–308.Google Scholar
  7. Cregler, L. L. (1993). Enrichment programs to create a pipeline to biomedical science careers. Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians, 4(4), 127–131.Google Scholar
  8. Cummings, P., & McKnight, B. (2004). Analysis of matched cohort data. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 274–281.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, J. A., & Davidson, C. P. (1982). The Med-COR study: Preparing high school students for health careers. Journal of Medical Education, 57(7), 527–534.Google Scholar
  10. Felix, D. A., Hertle, M. D., Conley, J. G., Washington, L. B., & Bruns, P. J. (2004). Assessing precollege science education outreach initiatives: A funder’s perspective. Cell Biology Education, 3(3), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, F., & Flowers, J. C. (1990). New York’s statewide approach to increase the number of minority applicants to medical school. Academic Medicine, 65(11), 671–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marshall, E. C. (1975). An experiment in health careers recruitment: A summer program at Indiana University. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 46(12), 1284–1292.Google Scholar
  13. McKendall, S. B., Simoyi, P., Chester, A. L., & Rye, J. A. (2000). The health sciences and technology academy: Utilizing pre-college enrichment programming to minimize post-secondary education barriers for underserved youth. Academic Medicine, 75(10 Suppl), S121–S123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2009, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) at Grades 4, 8, and 12 (NCES 2011-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Nickens, H. W., Ready, T. P., & Petersdorf, R. G. (1994). Project 3000 by 2000. Racial and ethnic diversity in U.S. medical schools. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(7), 472–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Philips, B. U., Mahan, J. M., & Perry, R. R. (1981). Minority recruitment to the health professions: A matched comparison 6-year follow-up. Journal of Medical Education, 56, 742–747.Google Scholar
  18. Rohrbaugh, M. C., & Corces, V. G. (2011). Opening pathways for underrepresented high school students to biomedical research careers: The Emory University RISE program. Genetics, 189(4), 1135–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenbaum, J. T., Martin, T. M., Farris, K. H., Rosenbaum, R. B., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2007). Can medical schools teach high school students to be scientists? FASEB J, 21, 1954–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sikes, S. S., & Schwartz-Bloom, R. D. (2009). LEAP! Launch into Education About Pharmacology: Transforming students into scientists. Molecular Interventions, 9(5), 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silverstein, S. C., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S., & Loike, J. D. (2009). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326(5951), 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slater, M., & Iler, E. (1991). A program to prepare minority students for careers in medicine, science, and other high-level professions. Academic Medicine, 66(4), 220–225.Google Scholar
  23. StataCorp. (2013). Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  24. Thomson, W. A., Denk, J. P., Miller, L. M., Ochoa-Shargey, B., & Jibaja-Rusth, M. (1992). Results of a summer academy to increase minority student access to allied health and other health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 21(2), 79–93.Google Scholar
  25. Thurmond, V. B., & Cregler, L. L. (1994). Career choices of minority high school student research apprentices at a health science center. Academic Medicine, 69(6), 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tough, P. (2014). Who gets to graduate? The New York Times Magazine, May 15, 2014.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Department of Education (USDE) (2011). Statement by U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan on the Release of the NAEP Science Report Card. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (2009). Pipeline programs to improve racial and ethnic diversity in the health professions: An inventory of federal programs, assessment of evaluation approaches, and critical review of the research literature. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Winkleby, M. A. (2007). The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students. Academic Medicine, 82(2), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winkleby, M., & Ned, J. (2010). Promoting science education. JAMA, 303(10), 983–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winkleby, M. A., Ned, J., Ahn, D., Koehler, A., Fagliano, K., & Crump, C. (2014). A controlled evaluation of a high school biomedical pipeline program: Design and methods. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 138–144.Google Scholar
  32. Winkleby, M. A., Ned, J., Ahn, D., Koehler, A. R., & Kennedy, J. (2009). Increasing diversity in science and health professions: A 21-year longitudinal study documenting college and career success. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xin, M. (2001). Participation in advanced mathematics: Do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Prevention Research CenterStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations