Design it yourself (DIY): in-house instructional design for online pharmacology
- 450 Downloads
Demand for e-learning courses has risen dramatically placing pressure on institutions to offer more online courses. Third party vendors now offer courses that can be embedded directly into learning management systems. When transitioning from in-class to e-learning formats, instructors must decide whether to use commercially available courses or design in-house. The objective of this study was to evaluate our transition from delivering introductory pharmacology via a purchased e-pack to an in-house designed course. A team that included an instructional designer, an education specialist and a content expert created an online course in pharmacology. Merrill’s first principles of instruction were used as a guide for the design of our online course. Where appropriate, multiple forms of media were introduced to reinforce concepts. We compared grades and design strategy from a previous iteration that was delivered using a commercially available e-pack. A cost analysis was conducted to determine the institutional setup and maintenance costs of in-house course design. The mean final grade from the in-house designed course was 81.9 (0.5) % compared to 76.4 (0.5) % for the e-pack course (P < 0.001). Course evaluations were significantly improved for the in-house course compared to the e-pack. Cost-analysis demonstrated that designing a course in-house has a high initial cost ($111,180.57) but can be maintained with minimal institutional cost ($500) in future offerings. Our results demonstrate that effective courses can be designed in-house and this should be a viable option for institutions that have appropriate resources to support instructional design.
KeywordsOnline learning Instructional design Undergraduate pharmacology Nursing education Basic health sciences education Curriculum development
The authors are grateful to the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Teaching Technology Services, the Instructional Technology Resource Centre, Strategic Technology Commons, the Teaching Support Centre and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University for financial and technical support. The authors also wish to thank the dedication of Bear Claw Media, along with Adam Pypstra, Tanja Coso, David Creces, Sam Allen, Corey Meingarten and Shohreh Shahi for their efforts in creating animations, case studies and medical art in this course.
- Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the USA, 2011. Wellesley, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from: http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Documents/going-the-distance.pdf.
- Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education. Also published by UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved from: https://htmldbprod.bc.edu/pls/htmldb/f?p=2290:4:0::NO:RP,4:P0_CONTENT_ID:117946.
- Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and Distance Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bell, P. D. (2007). Predictors of college student achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses. Education, 127, 11.Google Scholar
- Cropper, M. H., Bentley, J. P. H., & Schroder, K. (2009). How well do high-quality online courses employ Merrill’s first principles of instruction? In M. Orey, V. J. Mcclendon, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Farag, M., & Shemy, N. (2011). Course delivery through the web: Effects of linear/nonlinear navigation and individual differences in online learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 10, 243–271.Google Scholar
- Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mastrian, K. G., McGonigle, D., Bixler, B., & Mahan, W. L. (2010). Integrating technology in nursing education: Tools for the knowledge era. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980–2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 559–580.Google Scholar
- Prasad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–2007. (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2009-044). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar