Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 469–495 | Cite as

Exploring features of integrative teaching through a microanalysis of connection-making processes in a health sciences curriculum

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The interconnected nature of knowledge in the health sciences is not always reflected in how curricula, courses, and learning activities are designed. Thus have scholars advocated for more explicit attention to connection-making, or integration, in teaching and learning. However, conceptual and empirical work to guide such efforts is limited. This study analyzed classroom processes to determine what connections educators promoted in their classrooms and how those connections were made. A qualitative, focused ethnography design explored connection-making in a health science curriculum. Eight instructors were observed during ten class sessions resulting in 35 h of video data. Video data were entered into the observational software, Noldus Observer, and coded using continuous sampling. Frequency and duration of connections made were calculated in Noldus. Connection-making involved four interactive elements: The topic under direct consideration, other domains of professional knowledge (practice, student experience, research, theory, other content, core construct of the profession, external influences, metacognition), the integrative processes instructors used to connect a topic to other knowledge domains (informal example, stories, questioning, linking statements, formal cases, and program descriptions), and the learning and instructor context (type and purpose of course, instructor personal and professional experience). These elements are presented as an initial integrative learning taxonomy that can be used to guide explicit attention to connection-making in education and research.

Keywords

Integrative education Integrative teaching Philosophy Taxonomy Focused ethnography 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baxter Magolda, M. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship : Constructive-developmental pedagogy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bordogna, J., Fromm, E., & Ernst, E. W. (1993). Engineering education: Innovation through integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brookfield, S. (1985). Self-directed learning: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Chiang V. C. L., Leung, S. S., Chui, C. Y., Leung A. Y., & Mak, Y. W. (2013). Building life-long learning capacity in undergraduate nursing freshmen within an integrative and small group learning context. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1184–1191.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., & O’Brien, B. (2010). Educating physicians: A call for reform of medical school residency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (Ed.). (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Day, L. (2005). Case study: Integrative learning at its best. Retrieved from Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching website: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/nursing-education/case-study-integrative-teaching-its-best.
  11. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., et al. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology and ethics. Journal of Learning Sciences, 19, 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (No. 4). Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  14. Gale, R. (2006). Fostering integrative learning through pedagogy. Retrieved from Integrative Learning Project website: http//www. carnegiefoudaton. org/files/elibrary/integrativelearning/index. htm.Google Scholar
  15. Gasner, D., & Cleave-Hogg, D. (1996). A model for integrative learning: Bringing the clinic into a subject-centred curriculum. Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, 12(2), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooper, B. (2006). Beyond active learning: A case study of teaching practices in an occupation-centered curriculum. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(5), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hooper, B. (2010). On arriving at the centennial vision: Navigational landmarks to guide occupational therapy education. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24(1), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hooper, B., Atler, K., & Wood, W. (2011). Strengths and limitations of the occupational therapy Model Curriculum Guide as illustrated in a comprehensive curriculum revision process. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 25(2–3), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huber, M. (2005). Integrative learning as intellectual art. Paper presented at the Association of American Colleges and Universities Network Conference on Integrative Learning, Denver, CO. http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/ilp/what-is-ILP.htm.
  20. Huber, M., Brown, C., Hutchings, P., Gale, R., Miller, R., & Breen, M. (2007). Integrative learning: Opportunities to connect. The Integrative Learning Project. Stanford, CA: Association of American Colleges & Universities Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  21. Huber, M., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  22. Hutchings, P. (2005). Building habits—and habitats—of integrative learning. Paper presented at the Association of American Colleges and Universities Network Conference on Integrative Learning, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  23. Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 44. Retrieved from FQS: Forum Qualitative Social Research website: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/20.
  24. Miller, R. (2005). Integrative learning and assessment. Peer Review, Fall, 7(4), 11–14.Google Scholar
  25. Newell, W. H. (1999). The promise of integrative learning. About Campus (May–June), 4(2), 17–23.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer, P. (2010). Toward a philosophy of integrative education. In P. Palmer & A. Zajonc (Eds.), The heart of higher education: A call to renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Palmer, P., Zajonc, A., & Scribner, M. (Eds.). (2010). The heart of higher education: A call to renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/index_p.cfm?CFID=64584062&CFTOKEN=92754076.
  30. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, M., & McCarthy, M. P. (2010). Disciplinary knowledge in nursing education: Going beyond the blueprints. Nursing Outlook, 58(1), 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sullivan, W. M. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Sullivan, W. M., & Rosin, M. S. (2008). A new agenda for higher education: Shaping the life of the mind for practice. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  35. Wood, W., Nielson, C., Humphry, R., Coppola, S., Baranek, G., & Rourk, J. (2000). A curricular renaissance: Graduate education centered on occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara R. Hooper
    • 1
  • David Greene
    • 1
  • Pat L. Sample
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations