Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 769–778 | Cite as

Medical education: a particularly complex intervention to research



Previous debate has explored whether medical education research should become more like health services research in terms of frameworks, collaborations and methodologies. Notable recent changes in health services research include an increasing emphasis on complex interventions, defined as interventions that involve more than one component. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent of thinking about medical education as a complex intervention and to analyse medical education research to determine whether its collaborations and methodologies are becoming more like health services research. Research articles published in three journals over 2 years were analysed to determine the purpose of the research in relation to a framework for evaluating complex interventions, the degree of collaboration, and the methodology. Most studies aimed to develop theory or assess effectiveness and many categories of the complex interventions framework were not represented in the medical education research literature. Studies usually involved only one research site and were predominantly quantitative but not experimental or quasi-experimental. Whilst medical education research has not moved significantly in the direction of health services research over recent years, the complex interventions lens provided insights into why this might be so (namely the significant challenges associated with researching medical education). We recommend that medical education researchers work within a complex interventions framework and look to research fields with similar challenges (e.g. the study of chronic illness in a changing context) for ideas about theories, frameworks, methodologies and collaborations that can illuminate the field of medical education research.


Complex interventions Health services research Medical education Research methodologies 


  1. AcademyHealth. (2000). Health Services Research. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from
  2. Baernstein, A., Liss, H. K., Carney, P. A., & Elmore, J. G. (2007). Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969–2007. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1038–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A. L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., et al. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2007). Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. British Medical Journal, 334, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carline, J. D. (2004). Funding medical education research: Opportunities and issues. Academic Medicine, 79, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clauser, S. B., Taplin, S. H., Foster, M. K., Fagan, P., & Kaluzny, A. D. (2012). Multilevel intervention research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 44, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coast, J., Flynn, T., Sutton, E., AL-Janabi, H., Vosper, J., Lavender, S., et al. (2008). Investigating choice experiments for preferences of Older People. Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooksey, D. (2006). A review of UK health research funding. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from
  9. Dieppe, P., & Ades, T. (2008). Why does health services research seem so hard to fund? Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Sawi, N. I., Sharp, G. F., & Gruppen, L. D. (2009). A small grants program improves medical education research productivity. Academic Medicine, 84, S105–S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin, C. M., & Felix-Borlolotti, M. (2010). W(h)ither complexity? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 415–420.Google Scholar
  12. May, C. R., Finch, T., Ballini, L., MacFarlane, A., Mair, F., Murray, E., et al. (2011). Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalisation process theory. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKinley, R. K. (2007). Something needs to be done. British Medical Journal. Letter in response to Todres et al. 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from
  14. Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from
  15. Michie, S. (2008). Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health. Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norman, G. (2010). Is experimental research passé? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed, D. A., Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., & Wright, S. M. (2007). Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1002–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandars, J. E. (2007). Only half the story! British Medical Journal. Letter in response to Todres et al. 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from
  19. Schuwirth, L. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006). Challenges for educationalists. British Medical Journal, 333, 544–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Searle, J., & Prideaux, D. (2005). Medical education research: Being strategic. Medical Education, 39, 544–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shea, J. (2001). Mind the gap: Some reasons why medical education research is different from health services research. Medical Education, 35, 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shea, J. A., Arnold, L., & Mann, K. V. (2004). A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Academic Medicine, 79, 931–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Todres, M., Stephenson, A., & Jones, R. (2007). Medical education research remains the poor relation. British Medical Journal, 335, 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watt, G. C. M. (2005). Where health services research has led, medical education research may follow. Medical Education, 39, 555–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical School, St Luke’s CampusUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Centre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Social and Community MedicineUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Department of Health & Wellbeing, Medical School, Veysey BuildingUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations