Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 463–484

The utility of vignettes to stimulate reflection on professionalism: theory and practice

  • E. C. Bernabeo
  • E. S. Holmboe
  • K. Ross
  • B. Chesluk
  • S. Ginsburg
Article

Abstract

Professionalism remains a substantive theme in medical literature. There is an emerging emphasis on sociological and complex adaptive systems perspectives that refocuses attention from just the individual role to working within one’s system to enact professionalism in practice. Reflecting on responses to professional dilemmas may be one method to help practicing physicians identify both internal and external factors contributing to (un) professional behavior. We present a rationale and theoretical framework that supports and guides a reflective approach to the self assessment of professionalism. Guided by principles grounded in this theoretical framework, we developed and piloted a set of vignettes on professionally challenging situations, designed to stimulate reflection in practicing physicians. Findings show that participants found the vignettes to be authentic and typical, and reported the group experience as facilitative around discussions of professional ambiguity. Providing an opportunity for physicians to reflect on professional behavior in an open and safe forum may be a practical way to guide physicians to assess themselves on professional behavior and engage with the complexities of their work. The finding that the focus groups led to reflection at a group level suggests that effective reflection on professional behavior may require a socially interactive process. Emphasizing both the behaviors and the internal and external context in which they occur can thus be viewed as critically important for understanding professionalism in practicing physicians.

Keywords

Professionalism Qualitative research Reflection Self assessment 

References

  1. ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine. (2002). Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(3), 243–246.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organization learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, L., Niehaus, B., Lindow, J., Robertson, P. A., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2011). Development and pilot testing of a reflective learning guide for medical education. Medical Teacher, 33(10), e515–e521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, E. G., Regan, S., Gruen, R. L., et al. (2007). Professionalism in medicine: Results of a national survey of physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(11), 795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Coding in grounded theory practice. In: Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Coles, C. (2002). Developing professional judgment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Profession, 22, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with served measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA, 288, 1057–1060.Google Scholar
  14. Day, C. (1993). Professional learning and researcher intervention. British Educational Research Journal, 11, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1998). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duke, S., & Appleton, J. (2000). The use of reflection in a palliative care programme: a quantitative study of the development of reflective skills over an academic year. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(6), 1557–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, R. M. (1999). Mindful practice. JAMA, 282(9), 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eva, K., & Regehr, G. (2007). Knowing when to look it up: A new conception of self-assessment ability. Academic Medicine, 82(10 Suppl), S81–S84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eva, K., & Regehr, G. (2011). Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Advances in Health Sciences Research, 16(3), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farmer, E. A., & Page, G. (2005). A Practical guide to assessing clinical decision making skills using the key features approach. Medical Education, 39(12), 1188–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fern, E. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ginsburg, S., Bernabeo, E., Ross, K, & Holmboe, E. (2012). It depends: Results of a qualitative study investigating how practicing internists approach professional dilemmas. Academic Medicine (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Ginsburg, S., & Lingard, L. (2006). Using reflection and rhetoric to understand professional behaviors. In D. Stern (Ed.), Measuring medical professionalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ginsburg, S., Lingard, L., Regehr, G., & Underwood, K. (2008). Know when to rock the boat: How faculty rationalize students’ behaviors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(7), 942–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ginsburg, S., Regehr, G., Hatala, R., et al. (2000). Context, conflict, and resolution: A new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Academic Medicine, 75(10 Suppl), S6–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ginsburg, S., Regehr, G., & Lingard, L. (2003). The disavowed curriculum: Understanding students’ reasoning in professionally challenging situations. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(12), 1015–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ginsburg, S., Regehr, G., & Mylopoulos, M. (2007). Reasoning when it counts: Students’ rationales for action on a professionalism exam. Academic Medicine, 82(10 Suppl), S40–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon, M. J. (1991). A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Academic Medicine, 66, 762–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grimmett, P. P., & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385–456). Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
  33. Habermas, J. (1976). Moral development and ego identity in communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hafferty, F. W., & Castellani, B. (2010). The increasing complexities of professionalism. Academic Medicine, 85(2), 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hafferty, F. W., & Levinson, D. (2008). Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: Towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(4), 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodges, B., Ginsburg, S., Cruess, R., Cruess, S., Delport, R., Hafferty, F., et al. (2011). Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher, 33, 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  40. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Lesser, C. S., Lucey, C. R., Egener, B., Braddock, C. H., Linas, S. L., & Levinson, W. (2010). A behavioral and systems view of professionalism. JAMA, 304(24), 2732–2737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martimianakis, M. A., Maniate, J. M., Hodges, B. D., et al. (2009). Sociological interpretations of professionalism. Medical Education, 43(9), 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Papadakis, M. A., Arnold, G. K., Blank, L. L., Holmboe, E. S., & Lipner, R. S. (2008). Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(11), 869–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Papadakis, M. A., Teherani, A., Banach, M. A., et al. (2005). Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(25), 2673–2682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Physician-Hospital Relationships: The Empty Clubhouse, VHA Research Series, 2003.Google Scholar
  48. QSR International Pty. Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis program. 2011; 9.0.Google Scholar
  49. Rest, J. R. (1984). The major components of morlality. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moraltity, moral development and moral behavior (pp. 24–38). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Sandars, J. (2009). The Use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Medical Teacher, 31, 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  52. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stark, P., Roberts, C., Newble, D., & Bax, N. (2006). Discovering professionalism through guided reflection. Medical Teacher, 28(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern, D. (2006). Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Swick, H., Bryan, C., & Longo, L. (2006). Beyond the physician charter: Reflections on medical professionalism. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49(2), 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tulinius, C., & Holge-Hazelton, B. (2010). Continuing professional development for general practitioners: Supporting the development of professionalism. Medical Education, 44(4), 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wear, D., & Kuczewski, M. G. (2004). The professionalism movement: Can we pause? The American Journal of Bioethics, 4(2), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Youssef, F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., et al. (2011). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology. Sep 5. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. C. Bernabeo
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. S. Holmboe
    • 1
  • K. Ross
    • 1
  • B. Chesluk
    • 1
  • S. Ginsburg
    • 3
  1. 1.American Board of Internal MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Social Work and Social ResearchBryn MawrUSA
  3. 3.Wilson Centre for Research in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations