Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 409–425 | Cite as

The importance of seeing the patient: test-enhanced learning with standardized patients and written tests improves clinical application of knowledge

  • Douglas P. Larsen
  • Andrew C. Butler
  • Amy L. Lawson
  • Henry L. RoedigerIII
Article

Abstract

Previous research has shown that repeated retrieval with written tests produces superior long-term retention compared to repeated study. However, the degree to which this increased retention transfers to clinical application has not been investigated. In addition, increased retention obtained through written testing has not been compared to other forms of testing, such as simulation testing with a standardized patient (SP). In our study, 41 medical students learned three clinical topics through three different learning activities: testing with SPs, testing using written tests, and studying a review sheet. Students were randomized in a counter-balanced fashion to engage in one learning activity per topic. They participated in four weekly testing/studying sessions to learn the material, engaging in the same activity for a given topic in each session. Six months after initial learning, they returned to take an SP test on each topic, followed by a written test on each topic 1 week later. On both forms of final testing, we found that learning through SP testing and written testing generally produced superior long-term retention compared to studying a review sheet. SP testing led to significantly better performance on the final SP test relative to written testing, but there was no significant difference between the two testing conditions on the final written test. Overall, our study shows that repeated retrieval practice with both SPs and written testing enhances long-term retention and transfer of knowledge to a simulated clinical application.

Keywords

Long-term retention Simulation Standardized patients Tests Test-enhanced learning 

References

  1. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4/5), 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of U. S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effect in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMaria, S., Jr, Bryson, E. O., Mooney, T. J., Silverstein, J. H., Reich, D. L., Bodian, C., et al. (2010). Adding emotional stressors to training in simulated cardiopulmonary arrest enhances participant performance. Medical Education, 44, 1006–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fallucco, E. M., Hanson, M. D., & Glowinski, A. L. (2010). Teaching pediatric residents to assess adolescent suicide risk with a standardized patient module. Pediatrics, 125, 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feddock, C. A., Hoellein, A. R., Griffith, C. H., Wilson, J. F., Lineberry, M. J., & Haist, S. A. (2009). Enhancing knowledge and clinical skills through an adolescent medicine workshop. Archives of Adolescent and Pediatric Medicine, 163(3), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee, G. D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., I. I. I. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.Google Scholar
  13. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., I. I. I. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 15, 966–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kromann, C. B., Jensen, M. L., & Ringsted, C. (2010). The testing effect on skills might last 6 months. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(3), 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Medical Education, 42(10), 959–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Repeated testing versus repeated study: A randomized, controlled trial. Medical Education, 43(12), 1174–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., I. I. I. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGaghie, W. C. (2008). Research opportunities in simulation-based medical education using deliberate practice. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86, 706–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Sullivan, P., Chao, S., Russell, M., Levine, S., & Fabiny, A. (2008). Development and implementation of an objective structured clinical examination to provide formative feedback on communication and interpersonal skills in geriatric training. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 56(9), 1730–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Price, J. W., Price, J. R., Pratt, D. D., Collins, J. B., & McDonald, J. (2010). High-fidelity simulation in anesthesiology training: A survey of Canadian anesthesiology residents’ simulator experience. Canadian Journal of Anesthesiology, 57, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roediger, H. L., I. I. I., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Safdieh, J. E., Lin, A. L., Aizer, J., Marzuk, P. M., Grafstein, B., Storey-Johnson, C., & Kang, Y. (2011). Standaridized patient outcomes trial (SPOT) in neurology. Medical Education Online, 16. doi:10.3402/meo.v16i0.5634.
  27. Schmidmaier, R., Ebersbach, R., Schiller, M., Hege, I., Holzer, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2011). Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: Retesting versus restudying. Medical Education, 45, 1101–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevens, D. L., King, D., Laponis, R., Hanley, K., Zabar, S., Kalet, A. L., et al. (2009). Medical students retain pain assessment and management skills long after an experiential curriculum: A controlled study. Pain, 145(3), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organization processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas P. Larsen
    • 1
  • Andrew C. Butler
    • 2
  • Amy L. Lawson
    • 3
  • Henry L. RoedigerIII
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations