Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 377–388 | Cite as

Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews

  • B. GriffinEmail author
  • I. Wilson


Given the accumulating evidence that performance in medical school and beyond is related to personality, it is important for research to consider how personality assessment can be included as part of the process of selecting medical students. Interviews are one way of measuring personality and this study extends prior research investigating whether the multiple mini interview (MMI) is related to the five factor model of personality. In contrast to prior results (Kulasegaram et al. in Adv Health Sci Edu 15:415–423, 2010), examination of MMI scores for 868 applicants to an Australian medical school over 3 years showed significant uncorrected correlations every year with extraversion (.19, .19, .30) and conscientiousness (.20, .22, .25) and with agreeableness in 2 years (.17, .19). Investigation of personality at a facet-level revealed differing relationships with the MMI within the five factors of personality. MMI scores were also correlated in 2 years (.17, .22) with a situational judgment test of interpersonal understanding (UMAT Section 2) but were unrelated to tests of logical reasoning ability (UMAT Section 1), non-verbal reasoning (Section 3), or past academic performance (Higher School Certificate results).


Multiple mini-interview Personality testing Five factor model Medical school admissions 


  1. Albanese, M., Snow, M., Skochelak, S., Huggett, K., & Farrell, P. (2003). Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Academic Medicine, 78, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doherty, E. M., & Nugent, E. (2011). Personality factors and medical training: A review of the literature. Medical Education, 45, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education, 43(8), 767–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Merivield, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2004). Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin, B., & Wilson, I. (2010). Interviewer bias in medical student selection. The Medical Journal of Australia, 193(6), 343–346.Google Scholar
  12. Hough, L., & Dilchert, S. (2010). Personality: Its measurement and validity for employee selection. In J. Farr, & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 299–319). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  13. Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5(1 & 2), 139–155.Google Scholar
  14. Huffcutt, A. L., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Indentification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huffcutt, A. L., & Culbertson, S. S. (2011). Interviews. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  16. Kulasegaram, K., Reiter, H. I., Wiesner, W., Hackett, R. D., & Norman, G. R. (2010). Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview. Advances in Health Science Education, 15, 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lievens, F., Ones, D., & Dilchert, S. (2009). Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1514–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCrae, R. M., & Costa, P. T. (1994). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventor. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2011). Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical Teacher. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577123.
  20. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1994). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Musson, D. M. (2009). Personality and medical education. Medical Education, 43, 395–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Connor, D. B., Conner, M., Jones, F., McMillan, B., & Ferguson, E. (2009). Exploring the benefits of conscientiousness: An investigation of the role of daily stressors and health behaviors. Annuls of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41, 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMacquarie UniversityRYDE, SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of MedicineThe University of Western SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations