Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 253–276 | Cite as

Evidence-based practice: a review of theoretical assumptions and effectiveness of teaching and assessment interventions in health professions

  • Aliki ThomasEmail author
  • Alenoush Saroyan
  • W. Dale Dauphinee
Review

Abstract

Health care professionals are expected to use a systematic approach based on evidence, professional reasoning and client preferences in order to improve client outcomes. In other words, they are expected to work within an evidence-based practice (EBP) context. This expectation has had an impact on occupational therapy academic programs’ mandates to prepare entry-level clinicians who demonstrate competence in the knowledge, skills and behaviors for the practice of evidence-based occupational therapy. If the EBP approach is to be entrenched in the day to day practice of future clinicians, a pedagogically sound approach would be to incorporate EBP in every aspect of the curriculum. This, however, would require a comprehensive understanding of EBP: its basis, the principles that underpin it and its effectiveness in promoting core professional competencies. The existing literature does not elucidate these details nor does it shed light on how requisite competencies for EBP are acquired in professional education in general and in occupational therapy education in particular. Drawing from educational psychology and EBP in the health professions, this paper provides a critical review of the evidence that supports EBP and the effectiveness of EBP teaching and assessment interventions in professional heath sciences programs and offers suggestions for the design of EBP instruction, grounding recommendations in educational theory for the health professions.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice Occupational therapy Higher education Teaching Assessment Review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work contained in this review was supported by a Doctoral Scholarship from the “Fonds Québécois de Recherche sur la Société et Culture”, Quebec Government. Special thank you to Dr. Susanne P. Lajoie and Dr Laurie M. Snider for their valuable feedback on the manuscript.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interest and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark-matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55(2), 69–84.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal, S., Szatmari, P., & Hanson, M. (2008). Teaching evidence-based psychiatry: Integrating and aligning the formal and hidden curricula. Academic Psychiatry, 32(6), 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 213–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey form acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bass, M. K., & Glaser, R. (2004). Developing assessments to inform teaching and learning. Center for the Study of Evaluation report 628. National center for research on evaluation, standards, and student testing. Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, S., & Bennett, J. W. (2000). The process of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy: Informing clinical decisions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boston, C. (2003). Cognitive science and assessment. ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. College Park, MD. Retrieved from www.eric.ed.gov.
  12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, L. D. (1999). Rethinking transfer. A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., Webber, L. S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Interactive learning environments: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 121–212). Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002). Profile of occupational therapy practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 125–132.Google Scholar
  16. Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structure and memory development. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Choudhry, N. K., Fletcher, R. H., & Soumerai, S. B. (2005). Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(4), 260.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, C., Scott, E., & Krupa, T. (1993). Involving clients in programme evaluation and research: A new methodology for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 192–199.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, S. K. (2004). What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. British Medical Journal, 329, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coomarasamy, A., Taylor, R., & Khan, S. K. (2003). A systematic review of postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal. Medical Teacher, 25, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Craik, J., & Rappolt, S. (2003). Theory of research utilization enhancement: A model of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(5), 266–275.Google Scholar
  27. Craik, J., & Rappolt, S. (2006). Enhancing research utilization capacity through multifaceted professional development. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 155–164.Google Scholar
  28. Davidoff, F. (1999). In the teeth of the evidence. The curious case of evidence-based medicine. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 66, 75–83.Google Scholar
  29. Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, A., Martin, J., Hopayain, K., et al. (2005). Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. Medical Education, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
  30. Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G., & Ashcroft, R. (2009). Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine. Cancer control, 16(2), 158–168.Google Scholar
  31. Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Dubouloz, C. J., Egan, M., Vallerand, J., & Von Zweck, C. (1999). Occupational therapist’s perceptions of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 445–453.Google Scholar
  33. Egan, M., Dubouloz, C. J., von Zweck, C., & Vallerand, J. (1998). The client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 136–143.Google Scholar
  34. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9(1), 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ericsson, K. A. (2001). The path to expert performance: Insights from the masters on how to improve performance by deliberate practice. In P. Thomas (Ed.), Optimizing performance in golf (pp. 1–57). Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 10, S1–S12.Google Scholar
  38. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 2420–2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fenwick, T., & Parsons, J. (2000). The art of evaluation. A handbook for educators and trainees. Ontario: Thompson Educational publishing, Inc., University of Alberta. Toronto.Google Scholar
  42. Flores-Mateo, G., & Argimon, J. (2007). Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: A systematic review. BMC health services research, 7, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Forbes, A., & Griffiths, P. (2002). Methodological strategies for the identification and synthesis of ‘evidence’ to support decision-making in relation to complex health care systems and practices. Nursing Inquiry, 9, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18, 27–32.Google Scholar
  45. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1997). Reflective assessment of student’s research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  46. Fritsche, L., Greenhalgh, T., Falck-Ytter, Y., Neumayer, H. H., & Kunz, R. (2002). Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal, 325(7376), 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fuhrman, S. (1994). Uniting producers and consumers: Challenges in creating and utilizing educational research and development. In T. M. Tomlinson & A. C. Tuijnman (Eds.), Education research and reform: An international perspective (pp. 133–147). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  48. Gilhooly, K. J., McGeorge, P., Hunter, J., Rawles, J. M., Kirby, I. K., Green, C., et al. (1997). Biomedical knowledge in diagnostic thinking: The case of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxxvi). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Lajoie, S. P. (1987). Toward a cognitive theory for the measurement of achievement. In R. R. Ronning, J. Glover, J. C. Conoley, & J. C. Witts (Eds.), The influence of cognitive psychology on testing (pp. 41–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Graham, C. L. (1996). Conceptual learning processes in physical therapy students. Physical Therapy, 76, 856–865.Google Scholar
  52. Graue, M. E. (1993). Integrating theory and practice through instructional assessment. Educational Assessment, 1, 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gredler, E. M. (1997). Learning and instruction. Theory into practice. New Jersey: Merrill.Google Scholar
  54. Green, M. L. (1999). Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: A critical review of curricula. Academic Medicine, 74(6), 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gruppen, L. D. (2007). Improving medical education research. Teaching and learning in medicine, 19(4), 331.Google Scholar
  56. Hammell, K. W. (2001). Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 228–234.Google Scholar
  57. Hatala, R., & Guyatt, G. (2002). Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA, 288(9), 1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Haynes, R. B. (2002). What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? British Medical Council Health Services Research, 2, 3.Google Scholar
  59. Haynes, R. B., Devereaux, P. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2002). Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. American College of Physicians Journal Club, 136, A11–A14.Google Scholar
  60. Herbert, D. R., Sherrington, C., Maher, C., & Mosely, M. A. (2001). Evidence-based practice- imperfect but necessary. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 17, 210–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Honebein, P. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 17–24). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Hutchinson, J., & Huberman, M. (1993). Knowledge dissemination and utilization in science and mathematics education: A literature review. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Hyde, J. P., Deeks, J., & Milne, J. (2006). Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings. Review. The Cochrane collaboration. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1993). Implementing cooperative learning. Education Digest, 58, 62–66.Google Scholar
  65. Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning. Educational Technology, 36, 28–33.Google Scholar
  66. Jonassen, D. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34, 34–37.Google Scholar
  67. Kelson, C. A. (2000). Epilogue. Assessment of students for proactive lifelong learning. In D. H. Evenson & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning. A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 315–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  68. Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  69. Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Transitions and trajectories for studies of expertise. Educational Researcher, 32, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803–821). Mahmaw, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing X-ray pictures. In M. T. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Linn, R., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20, 15–21.Google Scholar
  74. Lloyd-Smith, W. (1997). Evidence-based practice and occupational therapy. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 474–478.Google Scholar
  75. Marks, D. F. (2002). Perspectives on evidence-based practice. (Research Report No.0047). Retrieved from the Health Development Agency Public Health Evidence website: http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/persp_evid_marks.pdf.
  76. Mattingly, C., & Fleming, M. (1994). Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Press.Google Scholar
  77. Maudsley, G., & Strivens, J. (2000). Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Medical Education, 34, 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Maynard, A. (1994). Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices. Lancet (British ed.), 349(9045), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McKeachie, J. W. (1986). Teaching psychology: Research and experience. In V. P. Makosley (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 6). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  80. Miles, A., Grey, J. E., Polychronis, A., Price, N., & Melchiorri, C. (2004). Developments in the evidence-based practice debate. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (1999). On the roles of task model variables in assessment design. CSE Technical Report 500. Los Angeles, CA: CRESST/UCLA.Google Scholar
  82. Mitchell, G. J. (1999). Evidence-based practice: Critique and alternative view. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12(1), 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Morse, J. M. (2005). Beyond the clinical trial: Expanding criteria for evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mowinski-Jennings, B. M., & Loan, L. A. (2001). Misconceptions among nurses about evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(2), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Neistadt, E. M., Wight, J., & Mulligan, E. S. (1997). Clinical reasoning case studies as teaching tools. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 125–132.Google Scholar
  86. Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., & Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 339–354). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Norman, G. R., & Shannon, I. S. (1998). Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: A critical appraisal. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 158, 177–181.Google Scholar
  88. Palinscar, A. M. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  90. Ramos, K. D., Schafer, S., & Tracz, S. M. (2003). Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal (International edition), 326(7384), 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rappolt, S. (2003). Evidence-based practice forum. The role of professional expertise in evidence-based occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 589–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Reagon, C., Bellin, W., & Boniface, G. (2008). Reconfiguring evidence-based practice for occupational therapists. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 15(10), 428–436.Google Scholar
  93. Reed, C. (1996). Improving the ability of master’s level occupational therapy students to strategically problem solve when providing services to children and youth ( Nova Southeastern University). Dissertation Abstracts.Google Scholar
  94. Rolfe, G. (1998). Expanding nursing knowledge: Understanding and researching your own practice. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  95. Rolfe, G. (1999). Insufficient evidence: The problems of evidence-based nursing. Nurse Education Today, 19, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rosenberg, W., & Donald, A. (1995). Evidence-based medicine: An approach to clinical problem solving. The British Medical Journal, 310, 1122–1125.Google Scholar
  97. Rothstein, J. M. (1998). Individual differences, variability and student research. Physical Therapy, 76, 126–127.Google Scholar
  98. Royer, M. J., Cisero, A. C., & Carlo, S. M. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63, 201–243.Google Scholar
  99. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. R., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What is it and what isn’t it? British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com.Google Scholar
  100. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Richardson, W. S., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill, Livingston Inc.Google Scholar
  101. Sackett, D. L., Strauss, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W. M., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingston Inc.Google Scholar
  102. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31–38.Google Scholar
  103. Schuwirth, L. W. T., & van der Vlauten, C. P. M. (2006). Challenges for educationalists. British Medical Journal, 333(7567), 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shaneyfelt, T., Baum, K. D., Bell, D., Feldstein, D., Houston, T. K., Kaatz, S., et al. (2006). Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(9), 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Shepard, L. A. (1989). Why we need better assessment. Educational Leadership, 46, 5–9.Google Scholar
  106. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14.Google Scholar
  107. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
  108. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–82.Google Scholar
  109. Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  110. Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (1995). Constructivism in education. NJ. Laurence Erlbaum: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  111. Stetler, C. B., Brunell, M., Giuliano, K. K., Morsi, D., Prince, L., & Newell-Stokes, V. (1998). Evidence-based practice and the role of nursing leadership. The Journal of nursing administration, 28(7/8), 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sullivan, T. M., & Bossers, A. (1998). Occupational therapy fieldwork levels. National Newsletter of the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 15, 8–9.Google Scholar
  113. Turner, P. (2001). Evidence-based practice and physiotherapy in the 1990’s. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 17, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. E. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Webb, S. A. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Welsh, I., & Lyons, C. M. (2001). Evidence-based care and the case for intuition and tacit knowledge in clinical assessment and decision making in mental health nursing practice: An empirical contribution to the debate. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wilson, B., & Cole, P. (1991). A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wolf, D. P., & Reardon, S. F. (1996). Access to excellence through new forms of student assessment. In J. B. Baron & D. P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 1–31). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  120. Yielder, J. (2004). An intergraded model of professional expertise and its implications for higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23, 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aliki Thomas
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alenoush Saroyan
    • 1
  • W. Dale Dauphinee
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of EducationMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations