Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 241–246 | Cite as

A critical time for medical education: the perils of competence-based reform of the curriculum

  • Karen MaloneEmail author
  • Salinder Supri
Reflections

Abstract

Rapid expansion in scientific knowledge, changes in medical practice, and greater demands from patients and society necessitate reform of the medical curriculum. In recognition of this, medical educators across the world have recommended the adoption of competence-based education. This is intended to increase the rigour and relevance of the curriculum, move students beyond a focus on the memorisation and regurgitation of scientific facts, and better enable them to understand scientific principles and apply them to the practice of medicine. Experience from 40 years’ use of competence-based curricula across the world suggests that the uncritical application of this approach to the medical curriculum may not achieve its intended aims. There are valuable lessons to be learnt from the history of competence-based education. By taking on board these lessons, confronting the pitfalls of this approach, and devising new and creative solutions to the problems inherent in this methodology, medical educators can better achieve their aim of providing a strong foundation for the practice of medicine in the twenty-first century. It is only through such a strategy—rather than the uncritical adoption of this educational approach—that we will have real movement and progress both in competence-based education in general, and in its applications to medicine in particular.

Keywords

Canada Competence-based education Curriculum change Curriculum development Curriculum reform Medical education Scotland United Kingdom United States 

References

  1. Argüelles, A., & Gonczi, A. (Eds.). (2000). Competency based education and training: A world perspective. Mexico City: Grupo Noriega Editores.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, P. D., & Saxton, J. (1990). On Competence. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 14(2), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2009). Scientific foundations for future physicians: Report of the AAMC-HHMI committee. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, P. (1997). The colleges, Calman and the New Deal. The Lancet, 350, 974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, I. (1999). The competence and outcomes movement. In M. Flude & S. Sieminski (Eds.), Education, training and the future of work II. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cave, E., & McKeown, P. (1993). Managerial effectiveness: The identification of need. Management Education and Development, 24(2), 122–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, A. (2007). Re-visiting the NVQ debate: ‘Bad’ qualifications, expansive learning environments and prospects for upskilling workers. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Statistics of education: Vocational qualifications in the UK: 2001/02—national statistics bulletin, issue 02/03. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, J. (1991). Competency based training and the education of professions—Is a happy marriage possible?. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Erridge, A., & Perry, S. (1994). The validity and value of national vocational qualifications: The case of purchasing. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 46(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. General Medical Council. (2002). Recommendation on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
  12. General Medical Council. (2009). Tomorrow’s doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
  13. Grundy, L. (2001). Pathways to fitness for practice: National vocational qualifications as a foundation of competence. Nurse Education Today, 21(4), 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halsall, R. (1995). Assessing competence in teacher education. In A. Edwards & P. Knight (Eds.), Assessing competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  15. Hodkinson, P., & Issitt, M. (1995). The challenge of competence: Professionalism though vocational education and training. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  16. Huddle, T. S., & Heudebert, G. R. (2007). Taking apart the art: The risk of atomizing clinical competence. Academic Medicine, 82(6), 536–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyland, T. (1993). Outcomes, competence and NVQs in higher education: A critique. Paper presented at the HEC conference on NVQs and HE: Opportunity or threat? Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  18. Hyland, T. (1994). Competence, education and NVQs: Dissenting perspectives. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  19. Leung, W.-C. (2002). Competency based medical training: Review. British Medical Journal, 325, 693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norman, G. (2006). Outcomes, objectives, and the seductive appeal of simple solutions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(3), 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. (2000). CanMEDS 2000: Extract from the CanMEDS 2000 project societal needs working group report. Medical Teacher, 22(6), 549–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scottish Medical Deans Curriculum Group. (2002). The scottish doctor—learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: A foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smithers, A. (1993). All our futures: Britain’s education revolution. London: Channel 4 Television.Google Scholar
  24. Talbot, M. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: A critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. West, J. (2004). Dreams and nightmares: The NVQ experience. Working Paper No 45. Leicester: University of Leicester, Centre for Labour Market Studies.Google Scholar
  26. Winter, R. (1995). The assessment of professional competences: The importance of general criteria. In A. Edwards & P. Knight (Eds.), Assessing competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  27. Wolf, A. (1995). Competence-based assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Änderung ConsultingNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations