An exploration of the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI)
- 569 Downloads
The present study explored the relationship between the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) admissions process and the Bar-On EQ-i emotional intelligence (EI) instrument in order to investigate the potential for the EQ-i to serve as a proxy measure to the MMI. Participants were 196 health science candidates who completed both the MMI and the EQ-i as part of their admissions procedure at the Michener Institute for Applied Health Sciences. Three types of analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between the two tools: reliability analyses, correlational analyses, and a t-test. The tools were found to be moderately reliable. No significant relationships were found between the MMI and the EQ-i at the total or subscale level. The ability of the EQ-i to discriminate between accepted and not-accepted students was also not supported. These findings do not support the use of the EQ-i as a potential pre-screening tool for the MMI, but rather highlight the need to exercise caution when using emotional intelligence instruments for high-stakes admissions purposes.
KeywordsAdmissions Emotional intelligence Health sciences Non-cognitive skills Multiple Mini-Interview
We would firstly like to thank Paul Gamble (The Michener Institute for Applied Health Sciences), CEO of the Michener Institute for Applied Health Sciences, for overseeing this study. We would also like to extend gratitude to all of the Michener candidates who participated in this study. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the MMI content expert, Lisa Slack (The Michener Institute for Applied Health Sciences), and EI content expert, Brett Richards (Connective Intelligence), for their assistance in mapping the MMI and EQ-i subscales and providing construct expertise.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Association of American Medical Colleges. (1998). Learning objectives for medical student education. Medical school objectives project. USA: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
- Bar-On, R. (1997). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bar-On, R. (1998). BarOn emotional quotient inventory: Facilitator’s resource manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Bar-On, R. (2004). The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Rationale, description and summary of psychometric properties. In G. Geher (Ed.), Measuring emotional intelligence: Common ground and controversy (pp. 111–142). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(supl), 13–25.Google Scholar
- Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF). (2006). Teamwork in healthcare: Promoting effective teamwork in healthcare in Canada. Ottawa, ON: CHSRF. Retrieved from www.chsrf.ca/research_themes/pdf/teamwork-synthesis-report_e.pdf.
- General Medical Council. (2003). Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education (2nd ed.). London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
- Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Kulasegaram, K., Reiter, H. I., Wiesner, W., Hackett, R. D., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview. Advances in Health Science Education [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In: P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence, pp. 3–31. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar