Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 573–585 | Cite as

From anatomical ‘competence’ to complex capability. The views and experiences of UK tutors on how we should teach anatomy to medical students

  • Sam Regan de BereEmail author
  • Karen Mattick
Article

Abstract

Developments in clinical education have recently challenged the identity of anatomy teaching and learning, leading to high profile debate over the potential implications for the competence levels of new doctors. However, the emphasis remains on methods of teaching, rather than a review of what well-rounded anatomical learning actually entails, and how teaching can address contemporary learning needs. This paper identifies and addresses some of these issues, drawing on expert views captured in qualitative research with anatomy tutors at twenty different medical schools in the UK. Three main themes emerging from our analysis are described: anatomy as a subject matter, the challenges of teaching or learning anatomy, and the use of teaching methods. We also detail how inductive analysis generated new hypotheses worthy of further consideration. These fall into two key categories: (1) improving anatomy curriculum design and (2) advancing anatomy education research.

Keywords

Anatomy teaching and learning Clinical relevance Complex capability Qualitative interviews Theoretical perspectives 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is drawn from the findings of the following project funded by the Higher Education Academy: Mattick, K and Regan de Bere, S. Is Anatomy Different? A Survey of Views of UK Anatomy Tutors. Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Medicine, Dentistry and Vetinary Medicine (MEDEV). 2008. We would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Rick Bowers, who led the project in the design and development phase of the study.

Ethical approval was granted by the Committee for Ethics at Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry.

References

  1. Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. (2007). Anastomosis: The ASGB&I Newsletter. Autumn.Google Scholar
  2. Aziz, A., McKenzie, J., et al. (2002). The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. The Anatomical Record (New Anat), 269, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bligh, J. (1995). Problem based, small group learning: An idea whose time has come. British Medical Journal, 311, 342–343.Google Scholar
  5. Chinnah, T. (2009). The views of students towards teaching and learning of anatomy. Masters Dissertation, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  6. Dangerfield, P. H., Bligh, J., Leinster, S., & Griffiths, R. (1996). Curriculum reform in Britain and its effects on anatomy. Clinical Anatomy, 6, 418.Google Scholar
  7. Dinsmore, C., Paul, H., & Sweet, F. (1993). A core anatomy program for the undergraduate medical curriculum. Academic Medicine, 73(5), 585–586.Google Scholar
  8. Dyer, G. S. M., & Thorndike, M. E. L. (2000). Quidne Mortui Vivos Docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Academic Medicine, 75(10), 969–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. General Medical Council. (1993). Tomorrow’s doctors. London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
  10. Leung, K., Lu, K., Huang, T. S., & Hsieh, B. (2006). Anatomy instruction in medical schools: Connecting the past and future. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattick, K., & Knight, L. (2007). High quality learning: Harder to achieve than we think? Medical Education, 41(7), 638–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McLachlan, J. M., Bligh, J., Bradley, P., & Searle, J. (2004). The use of cadavers in anatomy teaching. Medical Education, 38(4), 418–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McLachlan, J. M., & Patten, D. (2006). Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of the past, present and future. Medical Education, 40, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McLachlan, J. C., & Regan de Bere, S. (2004). How we teach anatomy without cadavers. Clinical Teacher, 1, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Moxham, B. J., & Patel, K. M. (2008). The relationship between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clinical Anatomy, 21(2), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Older, J. (2004). Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 2, 79–90.Google Scholar
  18. Patel, K. M., & Moxham, B. J. (2006). Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clinical Anatomy, 19, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patten, D. (2007). What lies beneath: The use of three dimensional projection in living anatomy and teaching. Clinical Teacher, 4, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pawlina, W., & Lachman, N. (2004). Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: Rebuttal to McLachlan. The Anatomical Record (New Anat), 281B, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petersen, A., & Regan de Bere, S. (2006). Dissecting medicine: Gender biases in the discourses and practices of medical anatomy. In D. Rosenfeld & C. Faircloth (Eds.), Medicalised masculinities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Regan de Bere, S., Collett, T. (2004). An ethnography of live and virtual anatomy. Paper presented to the British sociological association annual conference, York University, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Regan de Bere, S., & Petersen, A. (2006). Out of the dissecting room: News media portrayal of human anatomy teaching and research. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Regan de Bere, S., & Petersen, A. (2009). Crisis or renaissance? A sociology of anatomy in UK medical education. In B. Turner & C. Brosnan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of medical education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Scott, T. M. (1994). A care-based anatomy course. Medical Education, 28, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula College of Medicine & DentistryUniversities of Exeter and PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations