Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 415–423 | Cite as

Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview

  • Kulamakan Kulasegaram
  • Harold I. ReiterEmail author
  • Willi Wiesner
  • Richard D. Hackett
  • Geoffrey R. Norman
Article

Abstract

Most medical schools attempt to select applicants on the basis of cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Typically, interpersonal skills are assessed by interview, though relatively few applicants make it to interview. Thus, an efficient paper and pencil test of non-cognitive skills is needed. One possibility is personality tests. Tests of the five factor model of personality, and in particular the factor of conscientiousness, has proven effective in predicting future job performance. Can it serve as a screen for admissions interviews? In particular, correlation with the multiple mini-interviews (MMI) is of interest since the latter is a well validated test of non-cognitive skills. A total of 152 applicants to Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster completed the Neo-5 personality test voluntarily in advance of their admissions interviews. Correlations were calculated between personality factors and grade point average (GPA), medical college admissions test (MCAT) and MMI. No statistically significant correlation was found between personality factors and cognitive (GPA, MCAT) measures. More surprisingly, no statistically significant correlation was found between personality factors, including conscientiousness, and the MMI. Personality testing is not a useful screening test for the MMI.

Keywords

Multiple mini-interview Personality test Neo-5 test Screening test Medical school Admissions Validity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council) grant (SSHRC Standard Research Grant 410-2004-0541.

References

  1. Albanese, M., Snow, M. H., Skochelak, S. E., Huggett, K. N., & Farrell, P. M. (2003). Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Academic Medicine, 78, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 715–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezner, J. R., & Boucher, B. K. (2001). The influence of personality type on decision making in the physical therapy admission process. Journal of Allied Health, 30, 83–91.Google Scholar
  6. Boyle, G. J. (1996). Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30(1), 71–74.Google Scholar
  7. Chamberlain, T. C., Catano, V. M., & Cunningham, D. P. (2005). Personality as a predictor of professional behaviour in dental school: Comparisons with dental practitioners. Journal of Dental Education, 69, 1222–1236.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, J. C., Johnson, E. K., & Molider, J. B. (1990). The interview in the admission process. Academic Medicine, 3, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eva, K. W., & Reiter, H. I. (2004). Where judgement fails: Pitfalls in the selection process for medical personnel. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2004a). The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Academic Medicine, 10(Suppl), S40–S42.Google Scholar
  11. Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Predictive validity of the multiple-mini interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education, 4, 767–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004b). Admissions OSCE: The multiple mini-interview. Medical Education, 38, 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, E., James, D., O’Hehir, F., & Sanders, A. (2003). Pilot study of the roles of personality references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the 5 years of a medical degrees. British Medical Journal, 326, 428–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative description of personality the big 5 factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreiter, C. D., & Kreiter, Y. (2007). A validity generalization perspective on the ability of undergraduate GPA and the medical college admission test to predict important outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19, 95–100.Google Scholar
  17. Kreiter, C. D., Yin, P., Solow, C., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulatanga-Moruzi, C., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: The contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luh, S. P., Yu, M. N., Lin, Y. R., Chou, M. J., Chou, M. C., & Chen, J. Y. (2007). A study on the personal traits and knowledge base of Taiwanese medical students following problem-based learning instructions. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 36, 743–750.Google Scholar
  21. Lumsden, M. A., Bore, M., Millar, K., Jack, R., & Powis, D. (2005). Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school. Medical Education, 39, 258–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCrae, R. M., & Costa, P. T. (1994). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventor. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCrae, R. M., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poole, A., Catano, V. M., & Cunningham, D. P. (2007). Predicting performance in canadian dental schools: The new CDA structured interview, a new personality test, and the DAT. Journal of Dental Education, 71, 664–676.Google Scholar
  26. Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41, 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smithers, S., Catano, V. M., & Cunninghman, D. P. (2004). What predicts performance in Canadian dental schools? Journal of Dental Education, 68, 598–613.Google Scholar
  28. White, C. B., Dey, E. L., & Fantone, J. C. (2009). Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zemke, R. (1992). Second thoughts about MBTI. Training, 28, 43–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kulamakan Kulasegaram
    • 1
  • Harold I. Reiter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Willi Wiesner
    • 1
  • Richard D. Hackett
    • 1
  • Geoffrey R. Norman
    • 1
  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations