Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 14, Supplement 1, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Diagnostic error in medical education: where wrongs can make rights

  • Kevin W. Eva


This paper examines diagnostic error from an educational perspective. Rather than addressing the question of how educators in the health professions can help learners avoid error, however, the literature reviewed leads to the conclusion that educators should be working to induce error in learners, leading them to short term pain for long term gain. A variety of literatures are reviewed that suggest errors in performance are necessary pre-conditions for learning to occur such that an aversion to errors, while more comforting to the learner, is counter-productive. Similarly, research is reviewed that suggests strategies aimed at avoiding heuristic-driven diagnostic errors may successfully reduce those types of errors, but may do so at the expense of inducing errors of comprehensiveness. Taken together, the variety of studies contained suggest that diagnostic errors are often beneficial and that we as an educational community should strive to determine how to harness their pedagogical and diagnostic benefits rather than simply trying to eliminate mistakes entirely.


Diagnostic error Clinical decision-making Heuristics and biases Self-regulated learning Analogical transfer 


  1. Ark, T. K., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K. W. (2006). Giving learners the best of both worlds: Do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Academic Medicine, 81, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, G. R., Norton, P. G., Flintoft, V., et al. (2004). The Canadian adverse events study: The incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. JAMC, 170(11), 1678–1686.Google Scholar
  3. Barrows, H. S., Norman, G. R., Neufeld, V. R., & Feightner, J. W. (1982). The clinical reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. Medecine Clinique et Experimentale, 5, 49–56.Google Scholar
  4. Berner, E. S., & Graber, M. L. (2008). Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. American Journal of Medicine, 121, S2–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In: Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance. Interaction of theory and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boehler, M. L., Rogers, D. A., Schwind, C. J., Mayforth, R., Quin, J., Williams, R. G., et al. (2006). An investigation of medical student response to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 40, 746–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bordage, G. (2009). Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Medical Education, 43, 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., I. I. I. (2007). Testing improves long term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croskerry, P. (2002). Achieving quality in clinical decision making: Cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1184–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croskerry, P. (2003). The importance of diagnostic errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croskerry, P., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Overconfidence in clinical decision-making. American Journal of Medicine, 121, S24–S29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20–30.Google Scholar
  14. Elstein, A. S. (2009). Thinking about diagnostic thinking: A thirty year perspective. Advances in Health Sciences Education (this issue).Google Scholar
  15. Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eva, K. W. (2002). The aging physician: Changes in cognitive processing and their impact on practice. Academic Medicine, 77, S1–S6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eva, K. W. (2003). On the generality of specificity. Medical Education, 37, 587–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eva, K. W. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eva, K. W., & Cunnington, J. P. W. (2006). The difficulty with experience: Does practice increase susceptibility to premature closure? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eva, K. W, Munoz, J., Hanson, M. D., Walsh, A., & Wakefield, J. (2009). Providing influential feedback: How feedback is delivered and students’ self-assessments matter more than the severity of your concerns. Paper presented at the association of medical educators in Europe; Malaga, Spain.Google Scholar
  21. Eva, K. W., Neville, A. J., & Norman, G. R. (1998). Exploring the etiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Academic Medicine, 73, S1–S5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graber, M. L., Franklin, N., & Gordon, R. (2005). Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1493–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatala, R. M., Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1999). Influence of a single example on subsequent electrocardiogram interpretation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hertwig, R., Herzog, S. M., Schooler, L. J., & Reimer, T. (2008). Fluency heuristic: A model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1191–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Institute of Medicine. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jowett, N., LeBlanc, V., Xeroulis, G., MacRae, H., & Dubrowski, A. (2007). Surgical skill acquisition with self-directed practice using computer-based video training. American Journal of Surgery, 193, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.) (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health care system. Report of the Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kopp, V., Stark, R., & Fischer, M. R. (2008). Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: Effects of erroneous examples and feedback. Medical Education, 42, 823–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Preidting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kromann, C. B., Jensen, M. L., & Ringsted, C. (2009). The effect of testing on skills learning. Medical Education, 43, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 13, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. P., & Roediger, H. L., I. I. I. (2008). Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Medical Education, 42, 959–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586–597.Google Scholar
  35. McDaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychological Bulletin Review, 14, 200–206.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving bias in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mylopoulos, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42, 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Needham, D. R., & Begg, I. M. (1991). Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training. Memory & Cognition, 19, 543–557.Google Scholar
  39. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Feightner, J. W., & Barrows, H. S. (1981). Clinical problem solving by medical students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Medical Education, 15, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norman, G. R., Rosenthal, D., Brooks, L. R., Allen, S. W., & Muzzin, L. J. (1989). The development of expertise in dermatology. Archives of Dermatology, 125, 1063–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Norman, G., Young, M., & Brooks, L. (2007). Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience. Medical Education, 41, 1140–1145.Google Scholar
  43. Overeem, K., Wollersheim, H., Driessen, E., Lombarts, K., Van de Ven, G., Grol, R., & Arah, O. (2009). Why doctors do (not) improve their performance after 360 feedback: A qualitative study. Medical Education (In press).Google Scholar
  44. Pereles, L., Lockyer, J., & Fidler, H. (2002). Permanent small groups: Group dynamics, learning, and change. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schiff, G. D. (2008). Minimizing diagnostic error: The importance of follow-up and feedback. American Journal of Medicine, 121, S38–S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  48. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 907–912.Google Scholar
  50. Spath, P. L. (2000). Reducing errors through work system improvements. In: Error reduction in health care: A systems approach to improving patient safety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Wears, R. L., & Nemeth, C. P. (2007). Replacing hindsight with insight: Toward better understanding of diagnostic failures. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49, 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wegwarth, O, Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Smart strategies for doctors and doctors in training: Heuristics in medicine. Medical Education, 43 (in press).Google Scholar
  53. Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Epidemiology & BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations