Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 14, Supplement 1, pp 37–49 | Cite as

Dual processing and diagnostic errors

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

In this paper, I review evidence from two theories in psychology relevant to diagnosis and diagnostic errors. “Dual Process” theories of thinking, frequently mentioned with respect to diagnostic error, propose that categorization decisions can be made with either a fast, unconscious, contextual process called System 1 or a slow, analytical, conscious, and conceptual process, called System 2. Exemplar theories of categorization propose that many category decisions in everyday life are made by unconscious matching to a particular example in memory, and these remain available and retrievable individually. I then review studies of clinical reasoning based on these theories, and show that the two processes are equally effective; System 1, despite its reliance in idiosyncratic, individual experience, is no more prone to cognitive bias or diagnostic error than System 2. Further, I review evidence that instructions directed at encouraging the clinician to explicitly use both strategies can lead to consistent reduction in error rates.

Keywords

Clinical reasoning Diagnostic error Dual processing Non-analytic reasoning 

References

  1. Ark, T., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K. W. (2007). The benefits of flexibility: The pedagogical value of instructions to adopt multifaceted diagnostic reasoning strategies. Medical Education, 41, 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrows, H. S., Neufeld, V. R., Feightner, J. W., & Norman, G. R. (1982). The clinical reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 5, 49–56.Google Scholar
  4. Berner, E. S., & Graber, M. L. (2008). Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. American Journal of Medicine, 121, S2–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, L. R. (1978). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 141–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, B. D. (2004). The effects of speed on skilled chess performance. Psychological Science, 15, 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coderre, S., Mandin, H., Harasym, P. H., & Fick, G. H. (2003). Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education, 37, 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croskerry, P. (2000). The cognitive imperative: Thinking about how we think. Academic Emergency Medicine, 7, 1223–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croskerry, P. (2002). Achieving quality in clinical decision making: Cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1184–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croskerry, P. (2003a). Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision-making. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croskerry, P. (2003b). The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croskerry, P. (2006). Critical thinking and decision-making: Avoiding the perils of thin-slicing. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 48, 720–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croskerry, P. (2009). Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: Applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9182-2.
  15. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & von Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation—without—attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elstein, A. S. (1999). Heuristics and biases: Selected errors in clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine, 74, 791–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elstein, A.S. (2009). Thinking about diagnostic thinking: A thirty year perspective. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9184-0.
  18. Elstein, A. S., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Clinical problem-solving and diagnostic decision-making: A selective review of the cognitive literature. British Medical Journal, 324, 729–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1977). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eva, K. W., Hatala, R. M., LeBlanc, V. R., & Brooks, L. R. (2007). Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: Combined reasoning strategies helps novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Medical Education, 41, 1152–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eva, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2005). Heuristics and biases—A biased perspective on clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39, 870–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80, S46–S54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans, J. S. (2008). Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Modes of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilovich, T. (1993). How do we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday judgement. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. Little Brown: London.Google Scholar
  27. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Neuroimage, 12, 504–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graber, M. L., Franklin, N., & Gordon, R. (2005). Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1493–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graber, M. L., Gordon, R., & Franklin, N. (2002). Reducing diagnostic error in medicine: What’s the goal? Academic Medicine, 77, 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groopman, J. (2007). How doctors think. Harcourt: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Groves, M., O’Rourke, P., & Alexander, H. (2003). The clinical reasoning characteristics of diagnostic experts. Medical Teacher, 25, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamm, R. M. (2004). Theory about heuristic strategies based on verbal proptocol analysis: The emperor needs a shave. Medical Decision Making, 24(68), 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hatala, R., Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1999). Influence of a single example upon subsequent electrocardiogram interpretation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Koch, E. J., & Shepperd, J. A. (2005). Pitfalls in teaching judgment heuristics. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 13, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2004). The diagnostic disadvantage of having all the facts: Using comprehensive feature lists to bias diagnosis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mamede, S., Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. (2007). Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine. Journal of Evaluation and Clinical Practice, 13, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Medin, D., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). A context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 32, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Barrows, H. S., & Feightner, J. W. (1981). Clinical problem solving by medical students: Results of a crsosssectional and longitudinal analysis. Medical Education, 15, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Allen, S. W., & Rosenthal, D. (1990). Sources of observer variation in dermatologic diagnosis. Academic Medicine, 65, S19–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norman, G., Young, M., & Brooks, L. (2007). Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience. Medical Education, 41, 1140–1145.Google Scholar
  48. Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pretz, J. E. (2008). Intuition versus analysis: Strategy and experience in complex everyday problem-solving. Memory & Cognition, 36, 554–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Redelmeier, D. (2005). The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142, 115–120.Google Scholar
  52. Redelmeier, D. A., Shafir, E., & Aujla, P. S. (2001). The beguiling pursuit of more information. Journal of Medical Decision Making, 21, 376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schiff, G. D., Kim, S., Abrams, R., Cosby, K., Lambert, B., Elstein, A. S., et al. (2005). Diagnosing diagnosis errors: Lessons from a multi-institutional collaborative project. Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation. Washington DC: DHHS.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, H. A. (1976). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behaviorial and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wears, R. L., & Nemath, C. P. (2007). Replacing hindsight with insight: Toward better understanding of diagnostic failures. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49, 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Young, M. E., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Found in translation: The impact of familiar symptoms descriptions on diagnosis in novices. Medical Education, 41, 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations