Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 45–54 | Cite as

Chemistry courses as the turning point for premedical students

  • Donald A. Barr
  • John Matsui
  • Stanley F. Wanat
  • Maria Elena Gonzalez
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Previous research has documented that negative experiences in chemistry courses are a major factor that discourages many students from continuing in premedical studies. This adverse impact affects women and students from under-represented minority (URM) groups disproportionately. To determine if chemistry courses have a similar effect at a large public university, we surveyed 1,036 students from three entering cohorts at the University of California, Berkeley. We surveyed students at the beginning of their first year at the university and again at the end of their second year. All subjects had indicated an interest in premedical studies at the time they entered the university. We conducted follow-up interviews with a stratified sub-set of 63 survey respondents to explore the factors that affected their level of interest in premedical studies. Using a 10-point scale, we found that the strength of interest in premedical studies declined for all racial/ethnic groups. In the follow-up interviews, students identified chemistry courses as the principal factor contributing to their reported loss of interest. URM students especially often stated that chemistry courses caused them to abandon their hopes of becoming a physician. Consistent with reports over more than 50 years, it appears that undergraduate courses in chemistry have the effect of discouraging otherwise qualified students, as reflected in their admission to one of the most highly selective public universities in the US, from continuing in premedical studies, especially in the case of URM students. Reassessment of this role for chemistry courses may be overdue.

Keywords

Chemistry Diversity Ethnicity Medical education Minorities Premedical education Science education Race 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant from the California Wellness Foundation.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Barr, D. A., Gonzalez, M., & Wanat, S. F. (2008). The leaky pipeline: Factors associated with early decline in interest in pre-medical studies among under-represented minority undergraduate students. Academic Medicine, 83, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basco, W. T., Gilbert, G. E., Chessman, A. W., & Blue, A. V. (2000). The ability of a medical school admission process to predict clinical performance and patients’ satisfaction. Academic Medicine, 75, 743–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bevan, A. D. (1905). The history of the council and the scope of its work. Journal of the American Medical Association, 44, 1470.Google Scholar
  4. Dienstag, J. L. (2008). Relevance and rigor in premedical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donnon, T., Paolucci, E. O., & Violato, C. (2007). The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research. Academic Medicine, 82, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emanuel, E. J. (2006). Changing premed requirements and the medical curriculum. JAMA, 296, 1128–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grumbach, K., Odom, K., Moreno, G., Chen, E., Vercammen-Grandjean, C., & Mertz, E. (2008). Physician diversity in California: New findings from the California Medical Board Survey. Center for California Health Workforce Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Accessed September 26, 2008, from http://www.futurehealth.ucsf.edu/cchws/Ca%20Med%20Board%20FINAL%203%204%2008.pdf.
  8. Lovecchio, K., & Dundes, L. (2002). Premed survival: Understanding the culling process in premedical undergraduate education. Academic Medicine, 77, 719–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Matsui, J., Liu, R., & Kane, C. M. (2003). Evaluating a science diversity program at UC Berkeley: More questions than answers. Cell Biology Education, 2, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McManus, I. C., Powis, D. A., Wakeford, R., et al. (2005). Intellectual aptitude tests and a levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school. BMJ, 331, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell, K. J. (1990). Traditional predictors of performance in medical school. Academic Medicine, 65, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Montague, W., & Odds, F. C. (1990). Academic selection criteria and subsequent performance. Medical Education, 24, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Severinghaus, A. E., Carmen, H. J., & Cadbury, W. E. (1953). Preparation for medical education in the liberal arts colleges—the report of the subcommittee on preprofessional education of the survey of medical education (p. 99). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. Thurmond, V. B., & Cregler, L. L. (1999). Why students drop out of the pipeline to health professions careers: A Follow-up of gifted minority high school students. Academic Medicine, 74, 448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Veloski, J. J., Callahan, C. A., Xu, G., Hojat, M., & Nash, D. B. (2000). Prediction of students’ performances on licensing examinations using age, race, sex, undergraduate GPAs, and MCAT scores. Academic Medicine, 75(Suppl.), S28–S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Violato, C., & Donnon, T. (2005). Does the medical college admission test predict clinical reasoning skills? A longitudinal study employing the medical council of Canada clinical reasoning examination. Academic Medicine, 80(Suppl.), S14–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald A. Barr
    • 1
  • John Matsui
    • 2
  • Stanley F. Wanat
    • 1
  • Maria Elena Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Biology Scholars ProgramUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations