Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 601–608 | Cite as

Exploring emerging issues in research higher degree supervision of professional doctorate students in the health sciences

  • Peter A. LeggatEmail author
  • Kay Martinez
Reflections

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there has been an increase in the number of students undertaking traditional research masters and doctor of philosophy courses in the health sciences. This paper reviews and summarizes several aspects of the literature related to supervision of students in these traditional research higher degree (RHD) programs in Australasia: elements of RHD supervision; use of information and communication technologies in RHD supervision; warning signs for non-completion of RHD candidature; and evaluation of RHD supervision. The growth in traditional RHD enrolments has been paralleled by similar expansion in professional doctorate programs, and this paper draws attention to issues relating to supervision of these professional doctorate students, especially those studying at a distance. It draws on earlier research which compared structures of such programs across Australia and grounded professional doctorate supervision firmly in the workplace. Further, the emerging small body of literature associated with professional doctorate supervision is used to highlight features shared with and those distinct from traditional RHD supervision, and to identify fertile topics for further research into this burgeoning area.

Keywords

Professional doctorates Research higher degrees Supervision Health sciences Evaluation 

References

  1. Armstrong, J., & Conrad, L. (1995). Subject evaluation: A resource book for improving learning and teaching. Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education, Griffith University.Google Scholar
  2. Conrad, L. (1996). Chapter 4: A framework for evaluation of postgraduate supervision and support. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), Frameworks for postgraduate education (pp. 48–65). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University.Google Scholar
  3. Danby, S., & McWilliam, E. (2005). Respecting and challenging the candidate: Some developments in program design. In T. W. Maxwell, C. Hickey, & T. Evans (Eds.), Working doctorates: The impact of professional doctorates in the workplace and professions (pp 35–46). Revised papers from the 5th International Professional Doctorates Conference, Deakin University. Retrieved February 6, 2008, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/education/rads/conferences/publications/prodoc/index.php.
  4. Denholm, C. (2006). Ch. 15. Some personal obstacles to completion. In C. Denholm & T. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctorate study in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 122–128). Camberwell: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, L. B. (2006). The professional doctorate for nurses in Australia: Findings of a scoping exercise. Nurse Education Today, 26, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. For Improvement in Research Supervision and Training (fIRST) (2007). Home Page. Retrieved February 6, 2008, from http://www.first.edu.au.
  7. Leggat, P. A., Speare, R., & Dürrheim, D. N. (2003). Professional doctorates in public health: Contributing towards workforce specialisation and the knowledge economy. Health Professional Education, 5(2), 14–22.Google Scholar
  8. Manathunga, C. (2006). Detecting and dealing with warning signs in postgraduate research supervision. HERDSA News, December, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  9. Marsh, H. W., Rowe, K. J., & Martin, A. (2002). PhD students’ evaluations of research supervision: Issues, complexities, and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maxwell, T. W., & Shanahan, P. (2001). Professional doctoral education in Australia and New Zealand: Reviewing the scene. In B. Green, T. W. Maxwell, & P. Shanahan (Eds.), Doctoral education and professional practice: The next generation (pp. 17–38). Armidale: Kardoorair Press.Google Scholar
  11. McKavanagh, C., Bryant, K., Finger, G., & Middleton, H. (2004). Information and communication technologies and higher degree research supervision. “Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom: Holistic Approaches to Teaching and Learning”, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Conference Proceedings 2004. Refereed papers. Retrieved on February 6, 2008, from http://www.herdsa.org.au/conference2004/Contributions/RPapers/P021-jt.pdf.
  12. McWilliam, E., Taylor, P. G., Thomson, P., Green, B., Maxwell, T., Wildy, H., & Simons, D. (Eds.) (2002). Research training in doctorate programs: What can be learned from professional doctorates? Canberra: Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts.Google Scholar
  13. Morley, C. (2005). Supervising professional doctorate research is different. In P. Green (Ed.), Supervising postgraduate research: Contexts and processes, theories and practices (Chap. 7, pp. 106–122). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Neumann, R. (2002). Differentiating professional doctorates. In E. McWilliam (Ed.), Research training for the knowledge economy (p. 72). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  15. Parton, K. A., Ferguson, L., Gordon, J., Laughlin, A., Ling, L., Patterson, F., van Groningen, E., & Yong, D. (1998). A difficult birth: The Doctor of Health Services Management at the University of New England. In T. W. Maxwell & P. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Professional doctorates: Innovations in teaching and research (pp. 49–54). Proceedings of “Professional Doctorates: Innovations in Teaching and Research” Conference. Coffs Harbour, 8–10 July 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Rios Zambudio, A., Sanchez Gascon, F., Gonzalez Moro, L., & Guerrero Fernandez, M. (2004). Research training during medical residency (MIR): Satisfaction questionnaire. Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 96, 695–699. English; Spanish version: 700–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Unwin, T. (2007). Reflections on supervising distance-based PhD students. Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D). Royal Holloway, University of London, UK. Retrieved on February 6, 2008, from http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/distance-based%20PhDs.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation SciencesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts, Education and Social SciencesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations