Lack of interaction between sensing–intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: a randomized crossover trial
- First Online:
Adaptation to learning styles has been proposed to enhance learning.
We hypothesized that learners with sensing learning style would perform better using a problem-first instructional method while intuitive learners would do better using an information-first method.
Randomized, controlled, crossover trial.
Resident ambulatory clinics.
123 internal medicine residents.
Four Web-based modules in ambulatory internal medicine were developed in both “didactic” (information first, followed by patient problem and questions) and “problem” (case and questions first, followed by information) format.
Knowledge posttest, format preference, learning style (Index of Learning Styles).
Knowledge scores were similar between the didactic (mean ± standard error, 83.0 ± 0.8) and problem (82.3 ± 0.8) formats (p = .42; 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference, −2.3 to 0.9). There was no difference between formats in regression slopes of knowledge scores on sensing-intuitive scores (p = .63) or in analysis of knowledge scores by styles classification (sensing 82.5 ± 1.0, intermediate 83.7 ± 1.2, intuitive 81.0 ± 1.5; p = .37 for main effect, p = .59 for interaction with format). Format preference was neutral (3.2 ± 0.2 [1 strongly prefers didactic, 6 strongly prefers problem], p = .12), and there was no association between learning styles and preference (p = .44). Formats were similar in time to complete modules (43.7 ± 2.2 vs 43.2 ± 2.2 minutes, p = .72).
Starting instruction with a problem (versus employing problems later on) may not improve learning outcomes. Sensing and intuitive learners perform similarly following problem-first and didactic-first instruction. Results may apply to other instructional media.
KeywordsCognitive style Internet Instructional method Learning style Medical education Problem-based learning Web-based learning
- Boshuizen, H. P. A., Machiels-Bongaerts, M., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (1998). Learning from multiple cases: A new paradigm for investigating the effects of clinical experience on knowledge restructuring and knowledge acquisition. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 1998.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the National Research Council (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated learning and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18, 32–42.Google Scholar
- Case, S. M., & Swanson, D. B. (2001). Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.Google Scholar
- Clark, R. E. (2005). Five common but questionable principles of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
- Curry, L. (2000). Review of learning style, studying approach, and instructional preference research in medical education. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences, volume 1: Cognitive styles (pp. 239–276). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 286–290.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (2007). Index of learning styles. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage.html.
- Fleming, D. E., Mauriello, S. M., McKaig, R. G., & Ludlow, J. B. (2003). A comparison of slide/audiotape and web-based instructional formats for teaching normal intraoral radiographic anatomy. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 77, 27–35.Google Scholar
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Hart, G. (1995). Learning styles and hypertext: Exploring user attitudes. Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Lowdermilk, D. L., & Hopkins Fishel, A. (1991). Computer simulations as a measure of nursing students’ decision-making skills. Journal of Nursing Education, 30, 34–39.Google Scholar
- Merrill, M. D. (2002). Instructional strategies and learning styles: Which takes precedence? In R. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 99–106). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Rourke, L., & Lysynchuk, L. (2000). The influence of learning style on achievement in hypertext. Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 24–28, 2000.Google Scholar