Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences

  • María T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña
  • Eva Baillès
  • Xavier Caseras
  • Àlvar Martínez
  • Generós Ortet
  • Jorge Pérez
Original Article

Abstract

Although educational experts recommend the use of formative assessment, there is a dearth of empirical studies on its impact on academic achievement. In this research the authors analyse to what extent participation and performance in formative assessment are associated with positive academic outcomes of pre-graduate students of health sciences. A total of 548 students from three health science degrees (Medicine, Psychology and Biology) from four Spanish universities were involved in this study. The students who carried out mid-term formative assessment got better marks and had higher success rates in final summative assessment that the students who did not participate. In addition, success in formative assessment tests was associated with better summative marks. Interestingly, participation in formative assessment was a better predictor of final outcome than success in formative assessment, a result that supports the key role of feedback in formative assessment. Students who took the mid-term examination, irrespective of their success, obtained feedback about their achievement and probably this determined their greater involvement in the learning process. Although causal relationships between formative and summative assessment cannot be established from this research, the generalized benefits of formative assessments found here encourage the practice of them in health sciences education.

Keywords

Formative assessment Higher education Academic achievement 

References

  1. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caseras, X., Martínez, A., Ortet, G., & Pérez, J. (1999). Evaluaciones formativas en estudios de ciencias de la salud [Formative assessment in health sciences studies]. Educación Médica, 2, 58–9.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen-Schonatus, J. (1999). Student assessment and examination rules. Medical Teacher, 21, 318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Editorial. (1998). La evaluación formativa [Formative assessment]. Educación Médica, 1, 89.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, M. (1999). Assessment in outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21, 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guilbert, J. J. (Ed.). (1992). Education handbook for health personnel (6th ed.). Geneve: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  7. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4, 365–369.Google Scholar
  8. Hart, I. (1999). Best evidence medical education (BEME). Medical Teacher, 21, 453–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2002). Guide to the institutional self-study. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
  10. Nendaz, M. R., & Tekian, A. (1999). Assessment in problem-based learning medical schools: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11, 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nennin, S. P., & Kalishman, S. (1999). Student assessment. Academic Medicine, 73, s46–s54.Google Scholar
  12. Neufeld, V. R., Woodward, C. A., & McLeord, S. M. (1989). The McMaster MD program: A case study of renewal in medical education. Academic Medicine, 64, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rolfe, I., & McPherson, J. (1995). Formative assessment: How am I doing? Lancet, 345, 837–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher, 27, 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment in the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wass, V., Van der Vluten, C., Shatzer, J., & Jones, R. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet, 357, 945–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • María T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña
    • 1
  • Eva Baillès
    • 2
  • Xavier Caseras
    • 3
  • Àlvar Martínez
    • 3
  • Generós Ortet
    • 4
  • Jorge Pérez
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Faculty of MedicineUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesUniversitat Jaume ICastellonSpain

Personalised recommendations