Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 675–692 | Cite as

Student experiences of problem-based learning in pharmacy: conceptions of learning, approaches to learning and the integration of face-to-face and on-line activities

  • Robert A. Ellis
  • Peter Goodyear
  • Martha Brillant
  • Michael Prosser
Original Paper

Abstract

This study investigates fourth-year pharmacy students’ experiences of problem-based learning (PBL). It adopts a phenomenographic approach to the evaluation of problem-based learning, to shed light on the ways in which different groups of students conceive of, and approach, PBL. The study focuses on the way students approach solving problem scenarios in class, and using professional pharmacy databases on-line. Qualitative variations in student approaches to solving problem scenarios in both learning situations are identified. These turn out to be associated with qualitatively different conceptions of PBL and also with levels of achievement. Conceptions and approaches that emphasis learning for understanding correlate with attaining higher course marks. The outcomes of the study reinforce arguments that we need to know more about how students interpret the requirements of study in a PBL context if we are to unravel the complex web of influences upon study activities, academic achievement and longer-term professional competence. Such knowledge is crucial to any theoretical model of PBL and has direct practical implications for the design of learning tasks and the induction of students into a PBL environment.

Keywords

Problem-based learning Approaches to learning Conceptions of learning On-line Face-to-face Academic performance 

References

  1. Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (2001). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page .Google Scholar
  7. Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem based learning curricula: Theory and practice. Academic Medicine, 75, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colliver, J. A. (2002) Educational theory and educational practice: A cautionary note for medical school faculty. Academic Medicine, 75, 1217–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colliver, J., & Markwell, S. (2007). Research on problem-based learning: The need for critical analysis of methods and findings. Medical Education, 41, 533–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). University mathematics students conception of Mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlgren, M., Castensson, R., & Dahlgren, L. (1998). PBL from the teachers’ perspective. Higher Education, 36(4), 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahlgren, M., & Dahlgren, L. (2002). Portraits of PBL: Students’ experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology. Instructional Science, 30(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahlgren, M., Hult, H., Dahlgren, L., af Segerstad, H. H., & Johansson, K. (2006). From senior student to novice worker: Learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Grave, W., Dolmans, D., & van der Vleuten, C. (2002). Student perspectives on critical incidents in the tutorial group. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(3), 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, R. A. (2004) Student approaches to learning science through writing. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1835–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, R. A., & Calvo, R. (2006). Discontinuities in university student experiences of learning through discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006) How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussions: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  22. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students’ perspective. Instructional Science, 34, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodyear, P. (2006). Technology and the articulation of vocational and academic interests: Reflections on time, space and e-learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hendry, G. D., Lyon, P. M., Prosser, M., & Sze, D. (2006). Conceptions of problem-based learning: The perspectives of students entering a problem-based medical program. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 573–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hounsell, D. (1984). Essay planning and essay writing. Higher Education and Research., 3(1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hounsell, D. (1997). Contrasting conceptions of essay writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd. ed., pp. 106–125). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). Students’ conceptions of constructivist learning: A comparison between a traditional and a problem-based learning curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Students’ conceptions of constructivist learning: changes throughout the academic program and differences between a traditional and a problem-based learning curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.Google Scholar
  33. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.Google Scholar
  34. Mol, A. (2002). Cutting surgeons, walking patients: some complexities involved in comparing. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 218–257). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Norman, G. R. (2003). RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Medical Education, 37(7), 582–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norman, G. R., & Schmidt H. G. (1992) The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 555–565.Google Scholar
  37. Norman, G. R., Schmidt, H. G. (2000) Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The ‘how’ and ‘what’ of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ramsden, P. (2002). Learning to teach in higher education. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rikers, R. M. J. P, & Bruin, A. B. H (2006). Introduction to the special issue on innovations in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sternberg, R., & Horvath, J. (Eds.). (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  45. Te Winkel, W., Rikers, R., Loyens, S., & Schmidt, H. (2006). Influence of learning resources on study time and achievement scores in a problem-based curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vernon, D., & Blake R. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100–123). London: Falmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Ellis
    • 1
  • Peter Goodyear
    • 2
  • Martha Brillant
    • 3
  • Michael Prosser
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Teaching and LearningUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.University of Hong KongHong KongP.R. China

Personalised recommendations