Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 361–372 | Cite as

Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence

  • Tai M. Lockspeiser
  • Patricia O’Sullivan
  • Arianne Teherani
  • Jessica Muller
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Medical schools use supplemental peer-teaching programs even though there is little research on students’ actual experiences with this form of instruction.

Purpose

To understand the student experience of being taught by peers instead of by faculty.

Methods

We conducted focus groups with first- and second-year medical students participating in a supplemental peer-teaching program at one institution. From the learner focus group themes, we developed a questionnaire and surveyed all first-year students.

Results

Focus groups revealed four learner themes: learning from near-peers, exposure to second-year students, need for review and synthesis, teaching modalities and for the peer-teachers, the theme of benefits for the teacher. Factor analysis of the survey responses resulted in three factors: second-year students as teachers, the benefit of peer-teachers instead of faculty, and the peer-teaching process. Scores on these factors correlated with attendance in the peer-teaching program (P < .05).

Conclusions

Students valued learning from near-peers because of their recent experience with the materials and their ability to understand the students’ struggles in medical school. Students with the highest participation in the program valued the unique aspects of this kind of teaching most. Areas for improvement for this program were identified.

Keywords

Peer-teaching Undergraduate medical education Tutoring Preclinical education Curriculum Medical student teachers 

References

  1. Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.Google Scholar
  2. Ashwin, P. (2003). Peer support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported. Instructional Science, 31, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanc, R., & Martin, D. (1994). Supplemental instruction: Increasing student performance and persistence in difficult academic courses. Academic Medicine, 69, 452–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Ed). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cornwall, M. G. (1980). Students as teachers: Peer teaching in higher education. Amsterdam: Centrum Onderzoek Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs.Google Scholar
  7. Ebbert, M. R., Morgan, P. M., & Harris, I. B. (1999). A comprehensive student peer-teaching program. Academic Medicine, 74, 583–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Escovitz, E. S. (1990). Using senior students as clinical skills teaching assistants. Academic Medicine, 65, 733–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field, M., Burke, J., Lloyd, D., & McAllister, D. (2004). Peer-assisted learning in clinical examination. Lancet, 363, 490–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glynn, L. G., MacFarlane, A., Kelly, M., Cantillon, P., Murphy, A. W. (2006). Helping each other to learn—a process evaluation of peer-assisted learning. BMC Medical Education, 6, 18. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6920/6/18 (accessed September 7, 2006).Google Scholar
  11. Houwink, A. P., Kurup, A. N., Kollars, J. P., Frai Kollars, C. A., Carmichael, S. W., & Pawlina, W. (2004). Help of third-year medical students decreases first year medical students’ negative psychological reactions on the first day of gross anatomy dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 17, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurley, K. F., McKay, D. W., Scott, T. M., & James, B. M. (2003). The supplemental instruction project: Peer devised and delivered tutorials. Medical Teacher, 25, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kassab, S., Abu-Hijleh, M. F., Al-Shboul, Q., & Hamdy, H. (2005). Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: Educational outcomes and students’ perceptions. Medical Teacher, 27, 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore-West, M., Hennessy, S. A., Meilman, P. W., & O’Donnell, J. F. (1990). The presence of student-based peer advising, peer tutoring, and performance evaluation programs among U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine, 65, 660–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Moust, J. C., & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: A comparison of student and staff tutors’ behavior. Instructional Science, 22, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nestel, D., & Kidd, J. (2003). Peer tutoring in patient-centred interviewing skills: Experience of a project for first year students. Medical Teacher, 25, 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nestel, D., & Kidd, J. (2005) Peer assisted learning in patient-centered interviewing: The impact on student tutors. Medical Teacher, 27, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nnodim, J. O. (1997). A controlled trial of peer-teaching in practical gross anatomy. Clinical Anatomy, 10, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ocel, J. J., Palmer, B. A., Wittich, C. M., Carmichael, S. W., & Pawlina, W. (2003). Outcomes of gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience. Clinical Anatomy, 16, 526–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Santee, J., & Garavalia, L. (2006). Peer tutoring programs in health professions schools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(3), Article 70.Google Scholar
  22. Sawyer, S. J., Sylvestre, P. B., Girard, R. A., & Snow, M. H. (1996). Effects of supplemental instruction on mean test scores and failure rates in medical school courses. Academic Medicine, 71, 1357–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, Summer, 52–59.Google Scholar
  25. Sobral, D. T. (2002). Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: Conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Medical Education, 36, 1064–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed., p. 371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Tang, T. S., Hernadez, E. J., & Adams, B. S. (2004). “Learning by teaching”: A peer-teaching model for diversity training in medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16, 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Topping, K. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in higher and further education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32, 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wadoodi, A., & Crosby, J. R. (2002). Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: A classic concept revisited. Medical Teacher, 24, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitman, N. A. (1988). Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report). Washington DC: ERIC clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tai M. Lockspeiser
    • 1
  • Patricia O’Sullivan
    • 1
  • Arianne Teherani
    • 1
  • Jessica Muller
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine, Office of Medical EducationUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations