Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence

Abstract

Background

Medical schools use supplemental peer-teaching programs even though there is little research on students’ actual experiences with this form of instruction.

Purpose

To understand the student experience of being taught by peers instead of by faculty.

Methods

We conducted focus groups with first- and second-year medical students participating in a supplemental peer-teaching program at one institution. From the learner focus group themes, we developed a questionnaire and surveyed all first-year students.

Results

Focus groups revealed four learner themes: learning from near-peers, exposure to second-year students, need for review and synthesis, teaching modalities and for the peer-teachers, the theme of benefits for the teacher. Factor analysis of the survey responses resulted in three factors: second-year students as teachers, the benefit of peer-teachers instead of faculty, and the peer-teaching process. Scores on these factors correlated with attendance in the peer-teaching program (P < .05).

Conclusions

Students valued learning from near-peers because of their recent experience with the materials and their ability to understand the students’ struggles in medical school. Students with the highest participation in the program valued the unique aspects of this kind of teaching most. Areas for improvement for this program were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.

  2. Ashwin, P. (2003). Peer support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported. Instructional Science, 31, 159–173.

  3. Blanc, R., & Martin, D. (1994). Supplemental instruction: Increasing student performance and persistence in difficult academic courses. Academic Medicine, 69, 452–454.

  4. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Ed). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page Limited.

  5. Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  6. Cornwall, M. G. (1980). Students as teachers: Peer teaching in higher education. Amsterdam: Centrum Onderzoek Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs.

  7. Ebbert, M. R., Morgan, P. M., & Harris, I. B. (1999). A comprehensive student peer-teaching program. Academic Medicine, 74, 583–584.

  8. Escovitz, E. S. (1990). Using senior students as clinical skills teaching assistants. Academic Medicine, 65, 733–734.

  9. Field, M., Burke, J., Lloyd, D., & McAllister, D. (2004). Peer-assisted learning in clinical examination. Lancet, 363, 490–491.

  10. Glynn, L. G., MacFarlane, A., Kelly, M., Cantillon, P., Murphy, A. W. (2006). Helping each other to learn—a process evaluation of peer-assisted learning. BMC Medical Education, 6, 18. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6920/6/18 (accessed September 7, 2006).

  11. Houwink, A. P., Kurup, A. N., Kollars, J. P., Frai Kollars, C. A., Carmichael, S. W., & Pawlina, W. (2004). Help of third-year medical students decreases first year medical students’ negative psychological reactions on the first day of gross anatomy dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 17, 328–333.

  12. Hurley, K. F., McKay, D. W., Scott, T. M., & James, B. M. (2003). The supplemental instruction project: Peer devised and delivered tutorials. Medical Teacher, 25, 404–407.

  13. Kassab, S., Abu-Hijleh, M. F., Al-Shboul, Q., & Hamdy, H. (2005). Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: Educational outcomes and students’ perceptions. Medical Teacher, 27, 521–526.

  14. Moore-West, M., Hennessy, S. A., Meilman, P. W., & O’Donnell, J. F. (1990). The presence of student-based peer advising, peer tutoring, and performance evaluation programs among U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine, 65, 660–661.

  15. Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.

  16. Moust, J. C., & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: A comparison of student and staff tutors’ behavior. Instructional Science, 22, 287–301.

  17. Nestel, D., & Kidd, J. (2003). Peer tutoring in patient-centred interviewing skills: Experience of a project for first year students. Medical Teacher, 25, 398–403.

  18. Nestel, D., & Kidd, J. (2005) Peer assisted learning in patient-centered interviewing: The impact on student tutors. Medical Teacher, 27, 439–444.

  19. Nnodim, J. O. (1997). A controlled trial of peer-teaching in practical gross anatomy. Clinical Anatomy, 10, 112–117.

  20. Ocel, J. J., Palmer, B. A., Wittich, C. M., Carmichael, S. W., & Pawlina, W. (2003). Outcomes of gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience. Clinical Anatomy, 16, 526–530.

  21. Santee, J., & Garavalia, L. (2006). Peer tutoring programs in health professions schools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(3), Article 70.

  22. Sawyer, S. J., Sylvestre, P. B., Girard, R. A., & Snow, M. H. (1996). Effects of supplemental instruction on mean test scores and failure rates in medical school courses. Academic Medicine, 71, 1357–1359.

  23. Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714.

  24. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, Summer, 52–59.

  25. Sobral, D. T. (2002). Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: Conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Medical Education, 36, 1064–1070.

  26. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed., p. 371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  27. Tang, T. S., Hernadez, E. J., & Adams, B. S. (2004). “Learning by teaching”: A peer-teaching model for diversity training in medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16, 60–63.

  28. Topping, K. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in higher and further education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32, 321–345.

  29. Wadoodi, A., & Crosby, J. R. (2002). Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: A classic concept revisited. Medical Teacher, 24, 241–244.

  30. Whitman, N. A. (1988). Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report). Washington DC: ERIC clearinghouse on Higher Education.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Tai M. Lockspeiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockspeiser, T.M., O’Sullivan, P., Teherani, A. et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 361–372 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9049-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Peer-teaching
  • Undergraduate medical education
  • Tutoring
  • Preclinical education
  • Curriculum
  • Medical student teachers