Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence
- 2.4k Downloads
Medical schools use supplemental peer-teaching programs even though there is little research on students’ actual experiences with this form of instruction.
To understand the student experience of being taught by peers instead of by faculty.
We conducted focus groups with first- and second-year medical students participating in a supplemental peer-teaching program at one institution. From the learner focus group themes, we developed a questionnaire and surveyed all first-year students.
Focus groups revealed four learner themes: learning from near-peers, exposure to second-year students, need for review and synthesis, teaching modalities and for the peer-teachers, the theme of benefits for the teacher. Factor analysis of the survey responses resulted in three factors: second-year students as teachers, the benefit of peer-teachers instead of faculty, and the peer-teaching process. Scores on these factors correlated with attendance in the peer-teaching program (P < .05).
Students valued learning from near-peers because of their recent experience with the materials and their ability to understand the students’ struggles in medical school. Students with the highest participation in the program valued the unique aspects of this kind of teaching most. Areas for improvement for this program were identified.
KeywordsPeer-teaching Undergraduate medical education Tutoring Preclinical education Curriculum Medical student teachers
- Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.Google Scholar
- Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Ed). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
- Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Cornwall, M. G. (1980). Students as teachers: Peer teaching in higher education. Amsterdam: Centrum Onderzoek Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs.Google Scholar
- Glynn, L. G., MacFarlane, A., Kelly, M., Cantillon, P., Murphy, A. W. (2006). Helping each other to learn—a process evaluation of peer-assisted learning. BMC Medical Education, 6, 18. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6920/6/18 (accessed September 7, 2006).Google Scholar
- Houwink, A. P., Kurup, A. N., Kollars, J. P., Frai Kollars, C. A., Carmichael, S. W., & Pawlina, W. (2004). Help of third-year medical students decreases first year medical students’ negative psychological reactions on the first day of gross anatomy dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 17, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Santee, J., & Garavalia, L. (2006). Peer tutoring programs in health professions schools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(3), Article 70.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, Summer, 52–59.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed., p. 371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Whitman, N. A. (1988). Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report). Washington DC: ERIC clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar