A Cost Efficiency Comparison Between The Multiple Mini-Interview and Traditional Admissions Interviews
A major expense for most professional training programs, both financially and in terms of human resources, is the interview process used to make admissions decisions. Still, most programs view this as a necessary cost given that the personal interview provides an opportunity to recruit potential candidates, showing them what the program has to offer, and to try and gather more information about the candidates to ensure that those selected live up to the espoused values of the institution. We now have five years worth of experience with a Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) process that, unlike traditional panel interviews, uses the OSCE model to have candidates interact with a larger number of interviewers. We have found that the MMI is more reliable and has better predictive power than our traditional panel interviews. Still, the extent to which any measurement is valuable depends also on the feasibility of use. In this paper we report on an exploration of the cost effectiveness of the MMI as compared to standard panel-based interviews by considering the generation of interview material, human resource (i.e., interviewer and support staff) use, infrastructure requirements, and other miscellaneous expenses. Our conclusion is that the MMI requires greater preparatory efforts and a larger number of rooms to carry out the interviews relative to panel-based interviews, but that these cost disadvantages are offset by the MMI requiring fewer person-hours of effort. The absolute costs will vary dependent on institution, but the framework presented in this paper will hopefully provide greater guidance regarding logistical requirements and anticipated budget.
Keywordsadmissions interviewing multiple mini-interview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- CanMEDS 2000. Project Skills for the New Millenium: Report of the Societal Needs Working Group. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada’s Canadian Medical Education Directios for Specialists 2000 Project. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: 1996Google Scholar
- Cusimano M.D., Cohen R., Tucker W., Murnaghan J., Kodama R., Reznick R. (1994) A comparative analysis of the costs of administration of an OSCE (objective structured clinical examination). Academic medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 69: 571–576Google Scholar
- Eva K.W., Reiter H.I., Rosenfeld J., Norman G.R. (2004b) The relationship between interviewer characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges79: 602–609Google Scholar
- Eva K.W., Reiter H.I., Rosenfeld J., Norman G.R. (2004c) The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict pre-clerkship performance in medical school. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges79:S40–2Google Scholar
- Harden R.M., Gleeson F.A. (1979) Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Medical Education 13: 41–54Google Scholar
- Hodges B., Regehr G., McNaughton N., Tiberius R., Hanson M. (1999) OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges74:1129–1134Google Scholar
- Johnson E.K., Edwards J.C. (1991) Current practices in admission interviews at U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges66:408–412Google Scholar
- Julian E.R. (2005) Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges80:910–917Google Scholar
- Puryear J.B., Lewis L.A. (1981) Description of the interview process in selecting students for admission to US medical schools. Journal of Medical Education 56:881–885Google Scholar
- Reiter, H.I., Eva, K.W., Rosenfeld, J. & Norman G.R. Multiple mini-interview predicts clerkship and licensing exam performance. (submitted)Google Scholar
- Reznick R.K., Smee S., Baumber J.S., Cohen R., Rothman A., Blackmore D., Berard M. (1993) Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges68: 513–517Google Scholar
- Wiesner W.H., Cronshaw S.F. (1988) A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 61:275–290Google Scholar