Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 349–363 | Cite as

Using Clinical Experience in Discussion within Problem-Based Learning Groups



A key principle in problem-based learning (PBL) is the student linking learning from different sources to enrich understanding. We have explored how medical students based in a clinical environment use clinical experience within PBL groups. We recorded the discussion of 12 third-year groups, which were meeting for the second time on a PBL case, where students report back on the learning objectives. Discussions covering five separate PBL paper cases were recorded. Analysis of the transcripts was based on constant comparative method using a coding framework. The range of discussion segments of clinical experience was 2–15, with 9 of 12 groups having at least five separate segments. Our initial coding framework covered 10 categories, of which the most common were: a specific patient encounter (19%); an experience in the community (15%); and a personal health experience (15%). Students often used emotive phrases with 37 examples in the clinical experience segments compared with 9 from the longer non-clinical discussion. Most clinical descriptions triggered further discussion with almost half leading to some related medical topic. The discussion segments were subsequently coded into; ‘confirming’ (40); ‘extending’ (40); and ‘disconfirming’ (16) the understanding of the group for that topic. Discussion of clinical experience encouraged students to connect to the affective aspects of learning. It helped students to bridge between the tutorial and real clinical contexts. A clinical experience was often a powerful pivotal point, which confirmed, extended or refuted what was being discussed.


clinical experience group discussions problem-based learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrows H.S. (1986). A taxonomy of Problem-based learning methods Medical Education 20: 481–486Google Scholar
  2. Bickman L., Rog D.J. (Eds). (1998). Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods California. Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  3. Boshhuizen H.P.A., Bromme R., Gruber H. (Eds.) (2004) Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert Netherlands, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  4. Boter H., Van Delden J.J.M., De Haan RJ, Rinkel G.J.E. (2003) Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information British Medical Journal 327: 284–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dammers J., Spencer J., Thomas M. (2001) Using real patients in problem-based learning: students’ comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice Medical Education 35: 27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). (2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research California, Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  7. Diem S.J., Lantos J.D., Tulsky J.A. (1996) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television – miracles and misinformation New England Journal of Medicine 334: 1578–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dornan T., Bundy C. (2004). What can experience add to early medical education? Consensus survey British Medical Journal 329: 834–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dornan T., Scherpbier A., King N., Boshuizen H. (2005). Clinical teachers and problem-based learning: a phenomenological study Medical Education 39: 163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foley R.P., Polson A.L., Vance J.M. (1997) Review of the literature on PBL in the clinical setting Teaching & Learning in Medicine 9: 4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenhalgh T., Taylor R (1997). How to read a paper: papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) British Medical Journal 315: 740–743Google Scholar
  12. Jones A., McArdle P.J., O’Neill P.A. (2002). Perceptions of how well graduates are prepared for the role of a pre-registration house officer: A comparison of the outcomes of a traditional and a Problem-Based Learning Course at a UK Medical School Medical Education 36: 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones A., Willis S., O’Neill P.A. (2003). A Qualitative Study of the Attitudes to Teamwork of Graduates from a Traditional and an Integrated Undergraduate Medical Course Advances in Health Sciences Education 8: 139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenny N.P., Beagan B.L. (2004) The patient as text: a challenge for problem based learning Medical Education 38: 1071–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Littlewood S., Ypinazar V., Margolis S.A., Scherpbier A., Spencer J., Dornan T. (2005). Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review British Medical Journal 331: 387–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacPherson R., Jones A., Whitehouse C.R., O’Neill P.A. (2001). Small Group Learning in the Final Year of a Medical Degree: A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation Medical Teacher 23: 494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norman G.R., (2000). The epistemology of clinical reasoning: perspectives from philosophy, psychology and neuroscience Academic Medicine 75: S127–S133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Neill A.P., Metcalfe D., David T.J. (1999). The core content of the undergraduate curriculum in Manchester Medical Education 33: 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Neill P.A., Baxter C.M., Morris J. (2000). Evaluation of a new problem-based learning course in a clinical environment Medical Education 34: 222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Neill P.A., Willis S., Jones A. (2002). A Model of How Students link Problem-Based Learning with Clinical Experience Through Elaboration Academic Medicine 77: 552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Neill P.A., Jones A., Willis S.C., McArdle P.J. (2003). Does a New Undergraduate Curriculum Based on ‘Tomorrow’s Doctors’ Prepare House Officers Better for their First Post? A Qualitative study of the Views of Pre-Registration House Officers Using Critical Incidents Medical Education 37: 1100–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel V.L., Groen G.J., Scott H.M. (1988). Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students Medical Education 22: 398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patel V.L., Groen G.J., Norman G.R. (1991). Effects of conventional and problem-based curricula on problem solving Academic Medicine 66: 380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pope C., Ziebland S., Mays N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data British Medical Journal 320: 114–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prince K.J.A.H., Van de Wiel M.W.J., Scherpbier A.J.J.A., Van der Vleuten C.P.M., Boshuizen H.P.A. (2000). A qualitative analysis of the transition from theory to practice in undergraduate training in a PBL-medical school Advances in Health Science Education 5: 105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prince K.J.A.H., Boshuizen H.P.A., Van der Vleuten C.P.M., Scherpbier A.J.J.A. (2005). Students opinions about their preparation for clinical practice Medical Education 39: 704–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Remmen R., Denekens J., Scherpbier A.J.J.A., et al. (1998) Evaluation of skills training during clerkships using student focus groups Medical Teacher 20: 428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmidt H.G., Machiels-Bongaerts M., Hermans H., Ten Cate T.J., Venekamp R., Boshuizen H.P.A. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum Academic Medicine 71: 658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz R.W., Donnelly M.B., Nash P.P., Johnson S.B., Young B., Griffin W.O. (1992) Problem-Based Learning: an effective educational method for a surgical clerkship Journal of Surgical Research 53: 326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silverstone Z., Whitehouse C.R., Willis S., McArdle P.J., Jones A., O’Neill P.A. (2001) Students’ Conceptual Model of a Good Community Attachment (‘A Good G.P’) in a Problem-Based Learning Curriculum Medical Education 35: 946–956Google Scholar
  31. Van Boxtel, C. (2000). Collaborative concept learning: collaborative learning tasks, student interaction, and the learning of physics concepts. Enshede, Printpartners IpskampGoogle Scholar
  32. Visschers-Pleijers A.J.S.F., Dolmans D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen I.H.A.P., Van Der Vleuten C.P.M. (2004). Explorations of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning Medical Teacher 26: 471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Visschers-Pleijers A.J.S.F., Dolmans D.H.J.M., De Lang B.A., Wolfhagen I.H.A.P., Van der Vleuten C.P.M. (2005). Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study Medical Education 40: 129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Medical SchoolThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations