Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 253–261

Complex Interactions Between Tutor Performance, Tutorial Group Productivity and the Effectiveness of PBL Units as Perceived by Students

Article

Abstract

Aim: Tutor performance and tutorial group productivity interact with each other in a complex manner. The aim of this study was to investigate how tutor performance, tutorial group productivity and the effectiveness of a PBL unit interact with each other. Three hypotheses were tested: (1) Does the tutor performance score differ across different levels of group productivity? (2) Does the group productivity score differ across different levels of tutor performance? and (3) Is the learning effectiveness score of a PBL unit related to tutor performance and group productivity? Method: Students rated the tutor performance, the tutorial group productivity and the effectiveness of the PBL unit. In total 287 unique tutors were involved and were categorized as having a relatively low, average or relatively high score on tutor performance. This was also done for the group productivity score. For each combination, average effectiveness score were computed. Furthermore, partial correlation coefficients were computed. Results: The results demonstrated that the average tutor performance score was higher if the productivity score was higher (hypothesis 1). The results also demonstrated that the average productivity score was higher if the tutor performance score was higher (hypothesis 2). Furthermore it was found that the effectiveness score was higher if the productivity score was higher. The effectiveness score was also higher if the tutor score was higher. The results furthermore demonstrated that the correlation coefficient between tutor performance and effectiveness of the PBL unit is 0.01 (n.s.) if the correlation between the two variables was controlled for group productivity (was 0.36). In addition, the correlation coefficient between group productivity and effectiveness became 0.39 if the correlation between these two variables was controlled for tutor performance (was 0.51) (hypothesis 3). Conclusion: It is concluded that tutor performance differs across different levels of group productivity and that the group productivity score differs across different levels of tutor performance. In addition, it is concluded that both group productivity and the tutor’s performance have an impact on the effectiveness of a PBL unit, although the correlation between group productivity and effectiveness is higher than the correlation between tutor performance and effectiveness. This finding illustrates the importance of the group’s productivity in PBL and the tutor’s importance and implies that schools should put more efforts in improving tutorial group functioning as well as in improving a tutor’s performance.

Key words

group functioning problem-based learning tutoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berliner, D.C. 2002Educational research: The hardest science of allEducational Researcher311820Google Scholar
  2. Cate ten, O., Snell, L., Mann, K., Vermunt, J 2004Orienting teaching toward the learning processAcademic Medicine79219228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P., Schmidt, H.G 1996Effects of tutor expertise on student performance in relation to prior knowledge and level of curricular structureAcademic Medicine7110081011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P., Vleuten, C.P.M 1998Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groupsAcademic Medicine73S22S24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P., Hoogenboom, R.J.I., Vleuten, C.P.M 1999Is tutor performance dependent on the tutorial group’s productivity? Toward further resolving of inconsistencies in tutor performanceTeaching and Learning in Medicine11186191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., Vleuten, C.P.M 2001Relationship of tutors’ group-dynamics skills to their performance ratings in problem-based learningAcademic Medicine7647376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., Vleuten, C.P.M 2003Development of an instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of teachers in guiding small groupsHigher Education46431446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolmans D.H.J.M. & Ginns P. (in press). A short questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of tutors in PBL: Validity and reliability. Medical Teacher.Google Scholar
  9. Schmidt, H.G. 1994Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: does lack of structure cause students to seek tutor guidance?Academic Medicine69656662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vermunt, J.D., Verloop, N 1999Congruence and friction between learning and teachingLearning and Instruction9257280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana H.J.M. Dolmans
    • 1
  • Ineke H.A.P. Wolfhagen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Development & ResearchUniversity of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations