Medee Method Framework: a situational approach for organization-centered MAS
- 392 Downloads
This paper presents a situational approach, called Medee Method Framework, which allows the development of organization-centered MAS in a disciplined way, even though some agent organizational (AO) models are not currently incorporated into agent-oriented software engineering (AOSE) methods. In order to do that, such a method framework proposes the composition of MAS situational methods out of method fragments according to a given project situation, by applying the principles proposed by situational method engineering. The proposed approach provides a high degree of reuse and flexibility, allowing the composition of new methods as well as the reengineering of AOSE methods based on the standards proposed by SPEM. Furthermore, it allows the user to leverage advantages of both AOSE methods and AO models in order to develop organization-centered MAS. The Medee Method Framework offers a method repository that covers different development phases, such as requirements, analysis, design, implementation, as well as the main components of a MAS application, like agents, environments, interactions, and organizations. This repository has been sourced from several AOSE methods and AO models, as Gaia, Tropos, Ingenias, PASSI, MOISE, and OperA.
KeywordsOrganization-centered MAS AOSE method Method fragment Situational method
This research has been mostly supported by FAPESPRegular research project 2009/10121-4 and international cooperation FAPESP-CNRS project 2009/54773-5., Brazil. Jaime Sichman is partially supported by CNPq, Brazil. Sara Casare was partially supported by CAPES, Brazil. Zahia Guessoum is partially supported by CNRS, France. We would like to thank the invaluable work from the reviewers that helped us to improve the paper quality and readability.
- 1.Agerfalk, P. J., Brinkkemper, S., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B., Karlsson, F., Kelly, S., et al. (2007). Modularization constructs in method engineering: Towards common ground? In J. Ralyté, S. Brinkkemper, & B. Henderson-Sellers (Eds.), IFIP situational method engineering: Fundamentals and experiences (pp. 359–368). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
- 2.Basili, V. R. (1993). The experience factory and its relationship to other improvement paradigms. In I Sommerville & P. Manfred (Eds.), Fourth European Conference on Software Engineering ESEC 93 (pp. 68–83). doi: 10.1007/3-540-57209-0_6.
- 3.Bernon, C., Camps, V., Gleizes, M. P., & Picard, G. (2005). Engineering adaptive multiagent systems: The ADELFE methodology. In B. Henderson-Sellers & P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent oriented methodologies (pp. 172–202). London: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- 4.Bordini, R., & Hubner, J. (2007). Jason : A Java-based interpreter for an extended version of AgentSpeak. Retrieved February 25, 2013 from http://jason.sourceforge.net/Jason.pdf.
- 8.Casare, S. J. (2012). Medee: A method framework for multiagent systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Retrieved February 22, 2013 from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3141/tde-05032012-162517/en.php.
- 9.Casare, S. J., Brandão, A. A. F., & Sichman, J. S. (2010). A semiotic perspective for multiagent systems development. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010) (pp. 1373–1374). Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- 10.Casare, S. J., Brandão, A. A. F., & Sichman, J. S. (2010). A semiotic taxonomy to support multiagent systems situational development. In 1st Workshop on Autonomous Software Systems at CBSoft 2010, Salvador. AUTOSOFT 2010—I Workshop on Autonomous Software Systems—Anais CBSoft 2010. SBC, 2010, Vol. 10 (pp. 31–40). Retrieved February 26, 2013 from http://www.autosoft.pcs.usp.br/images/cbsoft2010_autosoft_anais.pdf.
- 11.Casare, S. J., Guessoum, Z., Brandão, A. A. F., & Sichman, J. S. (2010). Towards a new approach for MAS situational method engineering: A fragment definition. In O. Boissier, A. E. F. Seghrouchni, S. Hassas, & N. Maudet (Eds.), Proceedings of The Multiagent Logics, Languages, and Organizations Federated Workshops 2010, Vol. 627 (pp 3–16). Lyon-France, Aachen: CEUR-WS. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-627/fipa_1.pdf.
- 12.Casare, S. J., Guessoum, Z., Brandão, A. A. F. & Sichman, J. S. (2010). Devising situational method fragments for organization centered MAS development. In Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems—EUMAS 2010. Paris, Vol. 1 (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar
- 13.Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In T. Ishida (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS 95) (pp. 41–48).Google Scholar
- 15.Cossentino, M. (2005). From requirements to code with the PASSI methodology. In B. Henderson-Sellers & P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent oriented methodologies (pp. 79–106). London: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- 18.DeLoach, S. (2009). Moving multiagent systems from research to practice. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, 3(4), 378–382.Google Scholar
- 20.Demazeau, Y. (1995). From interactions to collective behavior in agent-based systems. In Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 117–132) Saint-Malo.Google Scholar
- 21.Demazeau, Y. (2010). Purposive multiagent systems. In Proeedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, ICAART (pp. 22–24), Vol. 1—Artificial Intelligence, Valencia, Spain, January.Google Scholar
- 22.Dignum, V. (2004). A model for organizational interaction: Based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 23.Firesmith, D., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2002). The OPEN process framework—An introduction. Harlow: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- 24.Garcia-Ojeda, J. C., Deloach, S. (2010). The O-MaSE process: A standard view. In Proceedings of Workshop FIPA Design Process Documentation and Fragmentation Working Group (DPDF WG) at Multiagent Logics, Languages, and Organisations Federated Workshops (MALLOW 2010) (pp. 55–66) Lyon, France.Google Scholar
- 25.Giorgini, P., et al. (2004). The Tropos methodology. In V. Bergenti, M. P. Gleizes, & F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and software engineering for agent systems (pp. 89–106). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- 26.Giorgini, P., et al. (2005). Tropos: A requirement-driven methodology for agent-oriented software. In B. Henderson-Sellers & P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent-oriented methodologies (pp. 20–45). London: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- 27.Giorgini, P., et al. (2005). The Tropos meta-model and its use. Informatica, 29, 401–408.Google Scholar
- 29.Guessoum, Z., Cossentino, M., & Pavón, J. (2004). Roadmap of agent-oriented software engineering—The agentlink perspective. In V. Bergenti, M. P. Gleizes, & F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and software engineering for agent systems (pp. 431–450). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Harmsen, A. F. (1997). Situational method engineering. Utrecht: Moret Ernst & young.Google Scholar
- 31.Haumer, P. (2007). Eclipse process framework composer—Part 1—Key concepts. Retrieved February 28, 2013 from http://www.eclipse.org/epf/general/EPFComposerOverviewPart1.pdf.
- 32.Henderson-Sellers, B. (2005). Creating a comprehensive agent-oriented methodology: Using method engineering and OPEN meta-model. In B. Henderson-Sellers & P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent-oriented methodologies (pp. 368–397). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- 33.Hubner, J., Sichman, J., & Boissier, O. (2002). A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In G. Bittencourt & G. L. Ramalho (Eds.), 16th Brazilian Symposium on AI, SBIA’02, LNAI 2507 (pp. 118–128). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- 36.Hubner, J., Sichman, J. S., & Boissier, O. (2008). MOISE+ tutorial. Retrieved February 22, 2013 from http://moise.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial.pdf.
- 37.IEEE-FIPA. (2012). Design Process Documentation Template, IEEE FIPA DPDF Working Group, #SC00097B, 2012–01-09. Retrieved February 25, 2013 from http://fipa.org/specs/fipa00097/SC00097B.pdf.
- 38.ISO 2007. ISO/IEC 24744:2007. (2007). Software engineering—Meta-model for development methodologies.Google Scholar
- 39.Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The unified software development process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- 40.Karlsson, F. (2005). Method configuration—Method and computerized tool support. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linkoping University.Google Scholar
- 41.Kruchten, P. (2003). The rational unified process: An introduction (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- 42.Lemaıtre, C., & Excelente, C. B. (1998). Multiagent organization approach. In 2nd Iberoamerican Workshop on Distributed AI and MAS, Toledo, Spain.Google Scholar
- 43.OMG. (2008). Object management group. Software & systems process engineering meta-model specification, version 2.0. OMG document number: formal/2008-04-01. Retrieved January 26, 2013 from http://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/.
- 44.Pavón, J., Gómez-Sanz, J. J., & Fuentes, R. (2005). The INGENIAS methodology and tools. In B. Henderson-Sellers & P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent oriented methodologies (pp. 236–276). London: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- 45.Picard, G., Hubner, J. F., Boissier, O., & Gleizes, M. -P. (2009). Réorganisation et auto-organisation dans les Système Multiagents. In Z. Guessoum & S. Hamas (Eds.), Journées Francophones sur les systèmes multiagents— Génie Logiciel Multiagent (JFSMA09) (pp. 89–97). France: Cepadués Editions.Google Scholar
- 46.Ralyté, J., Deneckére, R., & Rolland, C. (2003). Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In J. Eder et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2003) (pp. 95–110). Klagenfurt: Springer.Google Scholar
- 47.Rougemaille, S., Migeon, F., Millan, T., & Gleizes, M.-P. (2009). Methodology fragments definition in SPEM for designing adaptive methodology: A first step. In M. Luck, J. J. Gomez-Sanz (Eds.), AOSE 2008, LNCS, Vol. 5386 (pp. 74–85), Reading, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- 48.Seidita, V., Cossentino, M., & Gaglio S. (2006). A repository of fragments for agent systems design. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Objects and Agents (WOA 2006) (pp. 130–137), CEUR.Google Scholar
- 51.Seidita, V., Cossentino, M., & Chella, A. (2012). How to extract fragments from agent oriented design process, Workshop AOSE@AAMAS 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2013 from http://www.pa.icar.cnr.it/cossentino/paper/aose0212-fragment.pdf.
- 52.Sichman, J. S., & Demazeau, Y. (2001). On social reasoning in multiagent systems. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, 13, 68–84.Google Scholar
- 53.Sommerville, I. (2006). Software engineering (8th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- 54.Stamper, R. (1996). Signs, norms, and information system. In B. Holmqvist, P. B. Andersen, H. Klein, & R. Posner (Eds.), Signs at work: Semiosis & information processing in organizations (pp. 349–397). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- 55.Wood, M., & DeLoach, S. A. (2001). An overview of the multiagent systems engineering methodology. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (pp. 207–221). LNCS, Vol. 1957, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar