Advertisement

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 204–236 | Cite as

Multi-goal economic search using dynamic search structures

  • David Sarne
  • Efrat Manisterski
  • Sarit Kraus
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates cooperative search strategies for agents engaged in costly search in a complex environment. Searching cooperatively, several search goals can be satisfied within a single search effort. Given the searchers’ preferences, the goal is to conduct a search in a way that the expected overall utility out of the set of opportunities found (e.g., products when operating in a market) minus the costs associated with finding that set is maximized. This search scheme, given in the context of a group search, applies also to scenarios where a single agent has to search for a set of items for satisfying several different goals. The uniqueness of the proposed mechanism is in the ability to partition the group of agents/goals into sub-groups where the search continues for each group autonomously. As we show throughout the paper, this strategy is favorable as it weakly dominates (i.e., can improve but never worsen) cooperative and autonomous search techniques. The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the new search method and highlights the specific characteristics of the optimal search strategy. Furthermore, we introduce innovative algorithms for extracting the optimal search strategy in a range of common environments, that eliminates the computational overhead associated with the use of the partitioning technique.

Keywords

Search theory Multi-agent systems Cooperative search Coalition formation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bakos Y. (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science 43(12): 1676–1692zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baye M., Morgan J., Scholten P. (2004) Tempoal price dispersion: Evidence from an online consumer electronics market. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(4): 101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baye M., Morgan J., Scholten P. (2006) Persistent price dispersion in online markets. In: Jansen D. (eds) The new economy and beyond. Edward Elgar Press, Northampton MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benhabib J., Bull C. (1983) Job search: The choice of intensity. Journal of Political Economy 91(5): 747–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breban, S., & Vassileva, J. (2001). Long-term coalitions for the electronic marketplace. In B. Spencer (Ed.), Proceedings of e-commerce applications workshop. Canadian AI Conference, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brynjolfsson E., Hu E., Smith M. (2003) Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online bookseller. Management Science 49(11): 1580–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burdett K., Malueg D. A. (1981) The theory of search for several goods. Journal of Economic Theory 24(3): 362–376zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlson J. A., McAfee R. P. (1984) Joint search for several goods. Journal of Economic Theory 32(2): 337–345zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, S., & Liu, J. (2000). Optimal time-constrained trading strategies for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of MAMA’2000, Wollongong, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clay K., Krishnan R., Wolff E., Fernandes D. (2002) Retail strategies on the web: Price and non-price competition in the online book industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 50: 351–367Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    David, E., Azoulay-Schwartz, R., & Kraus, S. (2002). Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attribute auctions. In AAMAS ’02: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 77–85). Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dias, M. (2004). traderBots: A new paradigm for robust and efficient multirobot coordination in dynamic environments. Ph.D. thesis, Robotics Institute, CMU.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gal S., Landsberger M., Levykson B. (1981) A compound strategy for search in the labor market. International Economic Review 22(3): 597–608zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gatti J. R. J. (1999) Multi-commodity consumer search. Journal of Economic Theory 86(2): 219–244zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldman, C. V., & Zilberstein, S. (2003). Optimizing information exchange in cooperative multi-agent systems. In AAMAS ’03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 137–144). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart P. E., Nilsson N. J., Raphael B. (1968) A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Science and Cybernetics 4(2): 100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ito T., Ochi H., Shintani T. (2002) A group-buy protocol based on coalition formation for agent-mediated e-commerce. International Journal of Computer and Information Science (IJCIS) 3(1): 11–20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kahan J. P., Rapoport A. (1984) Theories of coalition formation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kephart J., Greenwald A. (2002) Shopbot economics. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5(3): 255–287CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leech D. (1987) Ownership concentration and the theory of the firm: A simple-game-theoretic approach. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35(3): 225–240CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lermann, K., & Shehory, O. (2000). Coalition formation for large scale electronic markets. In ICMAS’2000 (pp. 216–222). Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li, C., Chawla, S., Rajan, U., & Sycara, K. (2003). Mechanisms for coalition formation and cost sharing in an electronic marketplace. In EC03 (pp. 68–77). Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lippman S., McCall J. (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Economic Inquiry 14(2–3): 155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maes P., Guttman R. H., Moukas A. (1999) Agents that buy and sell. Communications of the ACM 42(3): 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manisterski, E. (2007). Protocols and strategies for agents teamwork. PhD thesis, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manisterski, E., Sarne, D., & Kraus, S. (2007). Enhancing mas cooperative search through coalition partitioning. In Manuela M. Veloso (Ed.) IJCAI (pp. 1415–1421).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manisterski, E., Sarne, D., & Kraus, S. (2008). Cooperative Search with Concurrent Interactions. In Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), (32:1–36).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McMillan, J., & Rothschild, M. (1994). Search. In Robert J. Aumann & Sergiu Hart (Eds.) Handbook of game theory with economic applications (pp. 905–927).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Michiardi P., Molva R. (2005) Analysis of coalition formation and cooperation strategies in mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 3: 2005Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morgan P. (1983) Search and optimal sample size. Review of Economic Studies 50(4): 659–675zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morgan P., Manning R. (1985) Optimal search. Econometrica 53(4): 923–944zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ogston, E., Overeinder, B., Van Steen, M., & Brazier, F. (2003). A method for decentralized clustering in large multi-agent systems. In AAMAS03 (pp. 789–796). Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ohta, N., Iwasaki, A., Yokoo, M., Maruono, K., Conitzer, V., & Sandholm, T. (2006). A compact representation scheme for coalitional games in open anonymous environments. In AAAI06, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rahwan, T., Ramchurn, S. D., Dang, V. D., Giovannucci, A., & Jennings, N. R. (2007). Anytime optimal coalition structure generation. In 22nd Conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 1184–1190). February 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rothschild M. (1974) Searching for the lowest price when the distribution of prices is unknown. Journal of Political Economy 82(4): 689–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sandholm T., Larson K., Andersson M. R., Shehory O., Tohme F. (1999) Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees. Artificial Intelligence 111(1–2): 209–238zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarne, D., & Kraus, S. (2003). The search for coalition formation in costly environments. In Proceedings of CIA (pp. 117–136).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sarne, D., & Kraus, S. (2005). Cooperative exploration in the electronic marketplace. In Proceedings of AAAI 2005 (pp. 158–163). Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shehory O., Kraus S. (1998) Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence 101(1–2): 165–200zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stigler G. (1961) The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy 69(3): 213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Talukdar S., Baerentzen L., Gove A., de Souza P. S. (1998) Asynchronous teams: Cooperation schemes for autonomous agents. Heuristics 4(4): 295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsvetovat, N., Sycara, K., Chen, Y., & Ying, J. (2000). Customer coalitions in electronic markets. In Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 121–138). Minnesota, MN.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yamamoto, J., & Sycara, K. (2001). A stable and efficient buyer coalition formation scheme for e-marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on autonomous agents (pp. 576–583). Montreal, CA.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yun Yeh D. (1986) A dynamic programming approach to the complete set partitioning problem. BIT 26(4): 467–474zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations