Root distribution and productivity in a poplar tree + alfalfa silvopastoral system in northwest China’s Xinjiang Province
Silvopastoral systems have been a way to address issues related to land use and desertification on the fringe of cities, particularly in northwest China where fast-growing urban population and threat of desertification have become serious problems. A field experiment conducted in northwest China evaluated the root distribution and interspecific interaction between the poplar (Populus L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in a silvopastoral system. Roots were sampled once every 15 d using an auger sampling method in a seven-year-old poplar tree + three-year-old alfalfa silvopastoral system, a three-year-old sole alfalfa, and a seven-year-old sole poplar. The results showed that intercropping had a negative effect on the root length density (RLD) of alfalfa and reduced the average root diameter (ARD) of alfalfa at 20–60 cm soil depth. The specific root length (SRL) of alfalfa in silvopastoral system was higher compared to sole cropping. In contrast, intercropping with alfalfa had a positive effect on the RLD and ARD of poplar at the alfalfa grown areas at 0–20 cm soil depth, but less effect on the SRL of poplar. Intercropping caused the reduction of alfalfa yield, but had not significant effect on the yield of stem wood volume of poplar. Calculating the land equivalent ratio in a poplar tree + alfalfa silvopastoral system, it showed that this system was advantageous in the utilization of resources and had a higher productivity compared with sole cropping. In conclusion, root competition and interactions between two intercropped species affects yield of alfalfa and the root distribution of intercropped species in a poplar + alfalfa silvopastoral system.
KeywordsAlfalfa yield Average root diameter (ARD) Land equivalent ratio (LER) Root length density (RLD) Intercropping Specific root length (SRL)
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 31460335 and 31560376), by the National Forage Industry Technical system of China (CARS-34), by a project funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Project No. 2015M582737), by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (Project No. 2009BADA4B03).
- Avice JC, Ourry A, Lemaire G, Volenec JJ, Boucaud J (1997) Root protein and vegetative storage protein are key organic nutrients for alfalfa shoot regrowth. Crop Sci 37:1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700040027x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Kong X, Gan Y, Zhang R, Feng F, Yu A, Cai Z, Wan S, Qiang C (2018) Enhancing the systems productivity and water use efficiency through coordinated soil water sharing and compensation in strip-intercropping. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28612-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gakis S, Mantzanas K, Alifragis D, Papanastasis VP, Papaioannou A, Seilopoulos D, Platis P (2004) Effects of understorey vegetation on tree establishment and growth in a silvopastoral system in northern Greece. Agrofor Syst 60:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000013275.30617.ad CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61–62:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000029002.85273.9b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Livesley SJ, Gregory PJ, Buresh RJ (2004) Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Soil water distribution and dynamics. Plant Soil 264:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:plso.0000047750.80654.d5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Hansen NC, Lampurlanés J, Cantero-Martínez C (2014) Winter cereal root growth and aboveground–belowground biomass ratios as affected by site and tillage system in dryland Mediterranean conditions. Plant Soil 374:925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1926-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Priyadarshini KVR, Prins HHT, Bie S, Heitkönig IMA, Woodborne S, Gort G, Kirkman K, Ludwig F, Dawson TE, Kroon H (2016) Seasonality of hydraulic redistribution by trees to grasses and changes in their water–source use that change tree–grass interactions. Ecohydrology 9:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rivest D, Rolo V, López-Díaz L, Moreno G (2011) Shrub encroachment in Mediterranean silvopastoral systems: Retama sphaerocarpa and Cistus ladanifer induce contrasting effects on pasture and Quercus ilex production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang W, Ahanbieke P, Wang BJ, Gan YW, Li LH, Christie P, Li L (2015) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots as affected by interspecific interactions in a young walnut/wheat alley cropping system in northwest China. Agrofor Syst 89:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9770-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar