Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Root distribution and soil properties under 12-year old sympodial bamboo plantation in Central Himalayan Tarai Region, India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worldwide, majority of the studies on root distribution have been confined to different tree species and monopodial bamboos in China with limited information on sympodial bamboos mainly due to methodological complexities. The present study therefore aims at understanding root distribution pattern of six commercial bamboo species and its impact on soil properties. Six bamboo species viz., Bambusa balcooa, Bambusa bambos, Bambusa nutans, Dendrocalamus asper, Dendrocalamus hamiltonii, and Dendrocalamus strictus were evaluated for their rooting pattern and impact on soil properties. Coarse root (CR) intensity was maximum in B. bambos (209.2) while, fine root (FR) intensity was highest in D. strictus (594.2). The FR contribution ranged from 69.9% in B. bambos to 80.1% in D. strictus. Coarse root biomass (in 0–50 cm soil profile) was highest in D. hamiltonii (1.19 Mg ha−1) and lowest in D. strictus (0.44 Mg ha−1). Maximum FR biomass (6.27 Mg ha−1) was observed in B. nutans which was closely followed by D. hamiltonii (6.19 Mg ha−1). In all the species, the share of fine root intensity was higher (70–80%) as compared to coarse roots. The contribution of FR was higher in genus Dendrocalamus (D. strictus, D. hamiltonii and D. asper) as compared to other species in genus Bambusa. Depth wise distribution of CR intensity revealed that roots were more or less uniformly distributed in 0–30 cm soil depth while fine root intensity was higher in 0–10 cm where 47% roots were observed. Soil physical properties viz., hydraulic conductivity, water stable aggregates and mean weight diameter showed significant improvement under different species. As compared to control treatment, soil organic carbon, NPK showed significant improvement. D. hamiltonii and B. balcooa were found better species are better species for maintaining soil fertility status. From the study it could be concluded that D. hamiltonii due to higher fine root biomass, is suitably recommended for resisting soil erosion, enhancing ground water recharge and maintaining soil fertility. B. balcooa can be preferred for agroforestry due to less root competition and compact canopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3: a
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banik RL (2000) Siviculture and field-guide to priority bamboos of Bangladesh and South-Asia. Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Chittagong

    Google Scholar 

  • Banik RL (2010) Biology and silviculture of muli bamboo Melocanna baccifera. In: National Mission on Bamboo Applications, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

  • Bhol N, Nayak H (2014) Spatial distribution of root and crop yield in a bamboo based agroforestry system. Indian For 140(6):135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Harte KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Methods of soil analysis part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods-agronomy monograph, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 425–442

  • Bohm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin, p 188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996). Nitrogene-total. In: Methods of soil analyses, part III, chemical methods et al). SSSA, Madison, pp 1085–1184

  • Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL (2000) Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia 125:389–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadisch GP, Willigen D, Suprayogo DC, Mobbs M, Noordwijk V, Rowe EC (2004) Catchingand competing for mobile nutrients in soils. In: vanNoordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CK (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CABI publishing, MA, pp 171–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR (2004) Researching structural complexity in agricultural soils. Soil Tillage Res 79:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Christanty L, Mailly D, Kimmins JP (1996) Without bamboo, the land dies: biomass, litterfall, and soil organic matter dynamics of a Javanese bamboo talun–kebun system. For Ecol Manag 87(1–3):75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Christanty L, Kimmins JP, Mailly D (1997) ‘Without bamboo, the land dies’: a conceptual model of the biogeochemical role of bamboo in an Indonesian agroforestry system. For Ecol Manag 91:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas LH, Eissenstat DM, Lakso AN (2000) Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. New Phytol 147(1):171–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Divakara BN, Kumar B, Mohan Balachandran PV, Kamalam NV (2001) Bamboo hedgerow systems in Kerala, India: Root distribution and competition with trees for phosphorus. Agrofor Syst 51:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekwue E (1992) Effect of organic and fertilizer treatments on soil physical properties and erodibilities. Soil Tillage Res 22:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(92)90037-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca W, Alice FE, ReyBenayas JM (2012) Carbon accumulation in aboveground and belowground biomass and soilof different age native forest plantations in the humid tropical lowlands of Costa Rica. New For 43(2):197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedure for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Willey, New York, p 80

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmisaari HS, Makkonen K, Kellomaki S, Valtonen E, Malkonen E (2002) Below- and above-ground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manag 165(1–3):317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Temporal depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J Ecol 84(2):167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosur GC, Dasog GS (1995) Effect of tree species on soil properties. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 43:256–259

    Google Scholar 

  • https://www.inbar.int/global-programmes/

  • Joshi AP, Sundriyal RC, Bahini DC (1991) Nutrient dynamics of a lower Siwalik bamboo forest in the Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Trop Forest Sci 3(3):238–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal R, Verma A, Mehta H, Mandal D, Tomar JMS, Jana CR, Jayparkash J, Chaturvedi OP (2016) Soil quality under Grewia optiva based agroforestry systems in western sub-Himalaya. Range Manag Agrofor 37(1):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu H, Onozawa Y, Kume T, Tsuruta K, Kumagai T, Shinohara Y et al (2010) Stand-scale transpiration estimates in a Moso bamboo forest: II comparison with coniferous forests. For Ecol Manag 260:1295–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukal SS, Kaur M, Bawa SS (2008) Erodibility of sandy loam aggregates in relation to their size and initial moisture content under different land uses in semi-arid tropics of India. Arid Land Res Manage 22:216–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324980802183137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Divakara BN (2001) Proximity, clump size and root distribution pattern in bamboo: a case study of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Willd., Poaceae, in the Ultisols of Kerala, India. J Bamboo Rattan 1(1):43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobovikov M, Paudel S, Piazza M, Ren H, Wu J (2007) World bamboo resources: a thematic study prepared in the framework of the global forest resources assessment 2005 non wood forest products 18 (1, 11–33 and 55). Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen K, Helmisaari HS (1998) Seasonal and yearly variations of fine-root biomass and necromass in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand. For Ecol Manag 102(2–3):283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal D, Singh R, Dhyani SK, Dhyani BL (2010) Landscape and land use effects on soil resources in a Himalayan watershed. CATENA 81:203–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLean EO (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. In: AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keeney (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, 2 edn. Agronomy 9:199–224

  • Mei L, Gu JC, Zhang ZW, Wang ZQ (2010) Responses of fine root mass, length, production and turnover to soil nitrogen fertilization in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica forests in North eastern China. J For Res JPN 15(3):194–201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel BR, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH (2011) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on soil quality parameters for grazed pasture and row-crop systems. Appl Soil Ecol 48:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghubanshi AS (1994) Effect of bamboo harvest on dynamics of nutrient pools, N mineralization, and microbial biomass in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 18(2):137–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens B, Poesen P, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees (Berl) 21:385–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha R, Tomar JMS, Ghosh PK (2007) Evaluation and selection of multipurpose tree for improving soil hydrophysical behaviour under hilly eco-system of north east India. Agrofor Syst 69:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9044-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seobi T, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ (2005) Influence of grass and agroforestry buffer strips on soil hydraulic properties for an Albaqualf. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:893–901

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmughavel P, Francis K (1997) Balance and turnover of nutrients in a bamboo plantation (Bambusa bambos) of different ages. Biol Fertil Soils 25(1):69–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmughavel P, Peddappaiah RS, Muthukumar T (2000) Litter production and nutrient return in Bambusa bambos plantation. J Sustain Forest 11(3):71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujatha MP, Thomas TP, Sankar S (2008) Influence of reed bamboo (Ochlandra travancorica) on soils of the western ghats in Kerala: a comparative study with adjacent non-reed bamboo areas. Indian For 134:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi M, Furusawa H, Limtong P, Sunathapongsuk V, Marod D, Panuthai S (2007) Soil nutrient status after bamboo flowering and death in a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand. Ecol Res 22:160–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tewari S, Banik RL, Kaushal R, Bhardwaj DR, Chaturvedi OPC, Gupta AK (2016) Bamboo based agroforestry systems. In: Kaushik S, Singh YS, Kumar D, Thapliyal M, Barthwal S (eds) Bamboos in India. ENVIS Centre of Forestry. National Forest Library and Information Centre, FRI, Dehradun, pp 261–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Toky OP, Ramakrishnan PS (1983) Secondary succession following slash and burn agriculture in North-Eastern India: II. Nutrient cycling. J Ecol 71:747–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi SK, Singh KP (1996) Fine root dynamics in a dry tropical bamboo savanna in India. In: Rangelands in a sustainable biosphere. Proceedings of the fifth international rangeland congress Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, July 23–28. Volume 1 Contributed presentations. Society for Range Management, Denver, pp 572–573

  • Tripathi SK, Singh KP, Singh PK (1999) Temporal changes in spatial pattern of fine -root mass and nutrient concentrations in Indian bamboo savanna. Appl Veg Sci 2:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (1999) Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution, and soil respiration in a multi-species riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Garrett HE, Anderson SH (2009) Soil enzyme activities and physical properties in a watershed managed under agroforestry and row-crop systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:98–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya K, Arunachalam A, Arunachalam K (2003) Microbial biomass and physico-chemical properties of soil under the canopy of Bambusa balcooa Roxb and Bambusa pallida Munro. Indian J Soil Conserv 31:152–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Brouwer G (1991) Review of quantitative root length data in agriculture. In: Persson H, McMichael BL (eds) Plant roots and their environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 515–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh MS, Bhatt BP, Kumar K, Majumdar B, Singh K (2005) Soil properties influenced by some important edible bamboo species in the North Eastern Himalayan region, India. J Bamboo Rattan 4:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma KS, Kohli S, Kaushal R, Chaturvedi OP (2014) Root structure, distribution and biomass in five multipurpose tree species of Western Himalayas. J Mt Sci 11(2):519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White DG, Childers NF (1945) Bamboo for controlling soil erosion. J Am Soc Agron 37:839–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LY, Wu ST, Zhang LB (2010) Fine root biomass dynamics and carbon storage along a successional gradient in Changbai Mountains, China. Forestry 83(4):379–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder RE (1936) A direct method of aggregate analysis and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses. J Am Soc Agron 28:337–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Mission on Bamboo Application, Department of Science and Technology (2005–2009), National Bamboo Mission (2010–2012), State Forest Department, Uttarakhand, India and International Bamboo and Rattan Organisation (INBAR) from 2016 to 2019. The financial help received during these periods is duly acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Joint Director Agroforestry Research Centre, GBPUAT, Pantnagar for providing necessary facilities to conduct the work. The help rendered by Mr. Ramesh Kumar during laying of experiment and data collection is duly acknowledged. We extend our sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers for the constructive suggestions and comments for improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun, 248 195, India

    R. Kaushal, S. D. Thapliyal & Indra Singh

  2. G.B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India

    Salil Tewari

  3. Ex-Research Consultant Bamboo Coordinating Centre, G.B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India

    R. L. Banik

  4. East Africa Regional Office, International Bamboo and Rattan Organization (INBAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    S. Reza & J. Durai

Authors
  1. R. Kaushal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salil Tewari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. L. Banik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. D. Thapliyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Indra Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Reza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Durai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salil Tewari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaushal, R., Tewari, S., Banik, R.L. et al. Root distribution and soil properties under 12-year old sympodial bamboo plantation in Central Himalayan Tarai Region, India. Agroforest Syst 94, 917–932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00459-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00459-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation