Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessment of crop yield, productivity and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems in Central Himalaya, India

Abstract

The present study deals with the assessment of crop composition, yield, biomass, net primary productivity (NPP), carbon stock and carbon sequestration in agri-silviculture (AS) and agri-horticulture (AH) agroforestry systems of Central Himalaya. An extensive field survey was carried out for the selection of AS (poplar + wheat) and AH (mango + wheat) systems practiced by the farmers in the region. In each agroforestry system, the wheat and tree species were assessed. Tree density was 400 and 278 individuals ha−1 in AS and AH systems while wheat density was 95 and 61 individuals m−2 in AS and AH systems, respectively. The yield and harvest index of wheat were 5096 kg ha−1 and 46% in AS system while 4009 kg ha−1 and 44.6% in AH system, respectively. In comparison with sole cropping system, the reduction in wheat yield was 19.7% in AS system and 36.8% in AH system. The biomass and net primary productivity of trees were 128.3 t ha−1 and 16.2 4 t ha−1 yr−1 in AS system while 171.95 t ha−1 and 14.4 t ha−1 yr−1 in AH system. However, the carbon sequestration of tree was 7.7 and 6.8 t C ha−1 yr−1 in AS and AH systems. The available nitrogen and phosphorus showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) with crop yield. The yield of wheat, NPP, carbon sequestration and nutrients of soil was higher in AS (poplar + wheat) system than in AH (mango + wheat) system. Therefore, we suggested the farmers to adopt the AS system for better outputs in terms of production, carbon sequestration and sustainability of land use system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Source: Google map

Fig. 2

Source: climate Uttarakhand

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Adhikari B, Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS (2017) Agroforestry systems: link between development and environment. In: Prakash P, Singh NK, Prakash A (eds) Ecological ignorance in development raising disastrous possibilities. Anamika Publishers & Distributors (P) ltd, Delhi, pp 1–13

  2. Arora G, Chaturvedi S, Kaushal R, Nain A, Tewari S, Alam NM, Chaturvedi OP (2014) Growth, biomass, carbon stocks, and sequestration in an age series of Populus deltoides plantations in Tarai region of central Himalaya. Turk I Agric For 38:550–560

  3. Beaudette C, Breadley RL, Whalen J, McVetty PBE, Vessey K, Smith DL (2010) Tree-based intercropping does not compromise canola (Brassica Napus L.) seed oil yield and reduces soil nitrous oxide emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:33–39

  4. Bhardwaj SD, Panwar P, Gautam S (2001) Biomass production potential and nutrient dynamics of Populus deltoides under high density plantations. Ind For 127(2):144–153

  5. Bijalwan A (2011) Productivity assessment of agricultural crops in existing agrihortisilvicultural system of mid hills of Central Western Himalaya, India. Afr J Agric Res 6(10):2139–2145

  6. Bijalwan A (2012) Structure composition and diversity of Horticulture trees and agricultural crops productivity under traditional agri-horticulture system in mid hill situation of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Am J Plant Sci 3(3):480–488

  7. Bisht N, Sah VK, Satyawali K, Tiwari S (2017) Comparison of wheat yield and soil properties under open and poplar based agroforestry system. J Nat Appl Sci 9(3):1540–1543

  8. Casanova-Lugo F, Aldana JP, Solorio-Sanchez Ramirez-Aviles L, Ward SE, Villanueva-Lopez G, Aryal DR (2018) Carbon stocks in biomass and soils of oody species fodder in the dry tropics of Mexico. Soil Use Manag 1:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12456

  9. Chaturvedi OP, Handa AK, Kaushal R, Uthapa AR, Sarvade S, Panwar P (2016) Biomass production and carbon sequestration through agroforestry. Range Manag Agrofor 37:116–127

  10. Chauhan SK, Sharma R, Sharma SC, Gupta N, Ritu (2012) Evaluation of poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh.) boundary plantation based agri-silvicultural system for wheat-paddy yield and carbon storage. Int J Agric For 2(5):239–246

  11. Chauhan SK, Sharma R, Singh B, Sharma SC (2015) Biomass production, carbon sequestration and economics of on farm poplar plantations in Punjab, India. J Appl Nat Sci 7(1):452–458

  12. Choudhury BU, Mohapatra KP, Das A, Das PT, Nongkhlaw L, Fiyaz AR, Ngachan SV, Rajkhowa DJ, Munda GC (2013) Spatial variability in distribution of organic carbon stocks in the soils of north-east India. Curr Sci 104(5):604–614

  13. Curtis JT (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

  14. Dagar JC (1995) Organic amendments in the reclamation and management of problem soils. In: Thampan PK (ed) Organic agriculture. Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation, Cochin, pp 145–171

  15. Fang SZ, Xu XZ, Lu SX, Tang LZ (1999) Growth dynamics and biomass production in short rotation poplar plantations: 6-year results for three clones at four spacings. Biomass Bioenergy 17(5):415–425

  16. Feliciano D, Ledo A, Hillier J, Nayak DR (2018) Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.032

  17. Gera M, Mohan G, Bisht NS, Gera N (2006) Carbon sequestration potential under agroforestry in Roopnagar District of Punjab. Ind For 132:543–555

  18. Gera N, Gera M, Bisht NS (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of selected plantation interventions in Terai region of Uttarakhand. Ind For 137(3):273–289

  19. Ghimire TB, Bana OPS (2015) Soil physico-bio-chemical properties under poplar + Indian mustard inter cropping system. J Nepal Agric Res Counc 1:14–20

  20. Goswami S, Verma KS, Kaushal R (2014) Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed. Biol Agric Hortic 30(2):88–96

  21. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  22. Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

  23. Jose S (2012) Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 85(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9517-5

  24. Jose S, Bardhan S (2012) Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: an overview. Agrofor Syst 86:105–111

  25. Kaur R, Puri S (2013) Productivity and nutrient dynamics in Vigna mungo and Triticum aestivum growing in an agroforestry system in Himachal Pradesh. Int J Bot Res 3(3):43–50

  26. Kumar K, Laik R, Das DK, Chaturvedi OP (2008) Soil microbial biomass and respiration in afforested calciorthent. Indian J Agrofor 10(2):75–83

  27. Lakshmana KP, Guru SK (2014) Growth indices of yield variability in wheat (Triticum aesitivum L.) under varying degree of shades. J Global Biosci 3(4):778–786

  28. Liyange MdeS (1994) Coconut based agroforestry in Sri Lanka. In: Thampan PK (ed) Organic agriculture. Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation, Cochin, pp 05–122

  29. Lodhiyal LS (2009) Certain intercropping characteristics of Poplar plantations in Tarai agro forestry system in Kumaun of Uttarakhand. In: Dobhal M, Kotilya BS (eds) Science and technology in Uttarakhand. Macmillan India Ltd, Daryaganj, New Delhi, pp 75–86

  30. Lodhiyal LS, Lodhiyal N (1997) Variation in biomass and net primary productivity in short rotation high density central Himalayan poplar plantations. For Ecol Manage 98:167–179

  31. Lodhiyal LS, Singh RP, Singh SP (1995) Structure and function of an age series of poplar plantation in central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 76:191–199

  32. Lodhiyal LS, Lodhiyal N, Singh SK, Koshiyari RS (2002) Forest floor biomass, litterfall and nutrient return through litters of high density poplar plantations in Tarai of Central Himalaya. Ind J For 25(3):291–303

  33. Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS, Adhikari B (2017) Forest floor biomass, litter input and nutrient pattern in Shisham plantations in Bhabar Region of Kumaun Himalaya. J Environ Bio Sci 31(1):17–22

  34. Lopenz-Santiago JG, Casanova-Lugo F, Lopez-Villanueva G, Diaz-Echeverria VF, Solorio-Sanchez FJ, Martinez-Zurimendi P, Aryal DR, Chay-Canul AJ (2018) Carbon storage in silvopastoral system compared to that in a deciduous dry forest in Michoacan. Agrofor Syst, Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0259-x

  35. Luedeling E, Kindt R, Huth NI, Koenig K (2014) Agroforestry systems in a changing climate—challenges in projecting future performance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:1–7

  36. Magnussen S, Reed D (2004) Modeling for estimation and monitoring. FAO-IUFRO

  37. Marone D, Poirier V, Coyea M, Olivier A, Munson AD (2017) Carbon storage in agroforestry systems in the semi-arid zone of Niayes, Senegal. Agrofor Syst 91:941–954

  38. Matos ES, Freese D, Mendonca ES, Slazak A, Reinhard FH (2012) Carbon, nitrogen and organic C fractions in topsoil affected by conversion from silvopastoral to different land use systems. Agrofor Syst 81:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9314-y

  39. Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability 6:8–14

  40. Mishra A, Swamy SL, Bargali SS, Singh AK (2010) Tree growth biomass and productivity of wheat under five promising clones of Populus deltoides in agrisilviculture system. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 36(2–3):167–174

  41. Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281

  42. Nair PKR (2007) The coming of age of agroforestry. J Sci Food Agri 87:1613–1619

  43. Newaj R, Bhargava MK, Yadav AS, Shanker AK (2003) Tree crop interaction in Albizia procera based Agroforestry system in relation to soil moisture, light and nutrients. Ind J Agroforestry 5:17–29

  44. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p 939

  45. Padalia K (2017) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen under different cropping systems of Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital

  46. Panwar P, Chauhan S, Kaushal R, Das DK, Ajit Arora G, Chaturvedi OP, Jain AK, Chaturvedi S, Tewari S (2017) Carbon sequestration potential of poplar based agroforestry using the CO2 FIX model in the Indo-Gangetic Region of India. Trop Ecol 58(2):1–9

  47. Parihaar R (2016) Carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential of different land use systems in Hills and Bhabar belt of Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis Kumaun University, Nainital

  48. Peach K, Tracy MV (1956) Modern methods of plant analysis. Springer, Adelaide

  49. Puri S, Nair PKR (2004) Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agrofor Syst 61:437–452

  50. Puri S, Swamy SL, Jaiswal AK (2002) Evaluation of Populus deltoides under nursery, field and agrisilviculture system in sub-humid tropics of central India. New For 23:45–61

  51. Raj A, Jhariya MK, Pithoura F (2014) Need of agroforestry and impact on ecosystem. J Plant Dev Sci 6(4):577–581

  52. Rizvi RH, Newaj R, Chaturvedi OP, Prasad R, Handa AK, Alam B (2019) Carbon sequestration and CO2 absorption by agroforestry systems: an assessment for Central Plateau and Hill region of India. J Earth Syst Sci 128:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1071-3

  53. Sarvade S, Mishra HS, Kaushal R, Chaturvedi S, Tewari S (2014) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and soil properties as influenced by different agri-silviculture systems of Tarai region, northern India. Int J Bio-res Stress Manage 5(3):350–355

  54. Sharma R, Chauhan SK, Tripathi AM (2015) Carbon sequestration potential in agroforestry system in India: an analysis for carbon project. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9840-8

  55. Sinclair FL (1999) A general classification of agroforestry practice. Agrofor Syst 49:161–180

  56. Singh N (2013) Structure and Function of traditional agroforestry system of Almora District of Western Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis. Kumaun University, Nainital

  57. Singh P, Lodhiyal LS (2009) Biomass and carbon allocation in 8-year-old poplar (Populus deltoides Marsh) plantation in Tarai agroforestry systems of Central Himalaya, India. New York Sci J 2(6):49–53

  58. Singh R, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA, Rajput BS (2017) Variation in soil properties under different land uses and attitudinal gradients in soils of the Indian Himalayas. Acta Ecol Sin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.12.003

  59. Sirohi C, Bangarwa KS (2017) Effect of different spacings of poplar-based agroforestry system on soil chemical properties and nutrient status in Haryana, India. Curr Sci 113(07):1403

  60. Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A, K-h Erb, Lauk C, Harper R, Tubiello FN, de Siqueira Pinto A, Jafari M, Sohi S, Masera O, Böttcher H, Berndes G, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Mbow C, Ravindranath NH, Rice CW, Robledo Abad C, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, Herrero M, House JI, Rose S (2013) How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob Change Biol 19:2285–2302

  61. Swami SL, Bharitya JK, Mishra A (2008) Growth, biomass, nutrient storage and crop productivity under different tree spacings of Gmelina arborea in agrisilviculture system. Ind J Agrofor 10(2):3–9

  62. Tandon VN, Pande MC, Rawat HS, Sharma DC (1991) Organic productivity and mineral cycling in plantations of Populus deltoides in Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh. Ind For 117:596–608

  63. Toky OP, Kumar P, Khosla PK (1989) Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agrofor Syst 9:47–70

  64. Tomar JS, Bhatt BP (2004) Studies on horti-agricultural system in a mid-altitude of Meghalaya. Ind J Agrofor 6(2):35–39

  65. Tubiello F, Schmidhuber J, Howden M, Neofotis PG, Park S, Fernandes E, Thapa D (2008) Climate change response strategies for agriculture: challenges and opportunities for the 21st century. Agriculture and rural development discussion paper 42. World Bank, Washington, DC

  66. Uniyal AK, Chhetri S (2010) An assessment of phytotoxic potential of promising agroforestry trees ongermination and growth pattern of traditional field crops of Sikkim Himalaya, India. Am Eurasian J Sci Res 5:249–256

  67. Valdiya KS (1980) Stratigraphic scheme of the sedimentary units of the Kumaun lesser Himalaya. In: Valdiya KS, Bhatia SB (eds) Stratigraphy and correlations of the lesser Himalayan formations. Hindustan Publication Corporation, Delhi, pp 7–48

  68. Verma KS, Zegeye MW, Kaushal R (2002) Growth and yield performance of wheat in agri-horti-silvicultural system of agroforestry in mid-hills of Himachal Himalayas. Ind J Agroforestry 4(1):1–7

  69. Villanueva-Lopez G, Martıinez-Zurimendi P, Casanova-Lugo F, Ramıirez-Aviles L, Montanez-Escalante PI (2015) Carbon storage in livestock systems with and without live fences of Gliricidia sepium in the humid tropics of Mexico. Agrofor Syst 6:1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9836-4

  70. Villanueva-Lopez G, Zurimendi-Martinez P, Aviles-Ramirez L, Aryal DR, Casanova-Lugo F (2016) Live fences reduce the diurnal and seasonal fluctuations of soill CO2 emissions in livestock systems. Agron Sustain Dev 36:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0358-x

  71. Waldron A, Garrity D, Malhi Y, Girardin C, Miller DC, Seddon N (2017) Agroforestry can enhance food while meeting other sustainable development goals. Trop Conserv Sci 10:1–6

  72. Walkley A, Black CA (1934) An experiment of Degtjareff methods for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration methods. Soil Sci 37:29–38

  73. Wang X, Feng Z (1995) Atmospheric carbon sequestration through agroforestry in China. Energy 20:117–121

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Botany and Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, D.S.B. Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, for providing necessary facilities.

Author information

Correspondence to Neelu Lodhiyal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adhikari, B., Lodhiyal, N. & Lodhiyal, L.S. Assessment of crop yield, productivity and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems in Central Himalaya, India. Agroforest Syst 94, 281–296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00388-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Density
  • Harvest index
  • Biomass
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Soil nutrients