Advertisement

Do improved pastures enhance soil quality of cork oak woodlands in the Alentejo region (Portugal)?

  • A. R. RodriguesEmail author
  • F. Costa e Silva
  • A. C. Correia
  • M. C. Bicho
  • M. Madeira
  • J. Coutinho
Article

Abstract

Portuguese forest sustainability is currently threatened by forecasted climate changes and inappropriate management practices. Specifically, large cork oak woodland areas (montados) are subjected to soil degradation and tree recruitment impeachment. A study was developed to compare soil properties in cork oak woodlands with improved pastures (IP) grazed by cattle and natural understorey management (NU) without grazing. The IP system did not lead to soil organic C concentration increase, soil organic C stock being 0.7 kg m−2 lower in the upper 30 cm soil layer, compared to the NU system. Under the IP management, soil N content was 39.7 g m−2 higher up to 30 cm depth, and N mineralization potential was increased by 50% in the 10 cm top soil layer. Soil bulk density and C mineralization potential were similar in both systems. Sowing legume-rich pastures can result in an immediate soil quality improvement, especially regarding N availability, although grazing may hamper tree recruitment. Managing the natural understorey appears suitable for soil organic C maintenance, and also allows tree recruitment, while soil N availability limitation could be overcome by fertilizer applications.

Keywords

Nitrogen Management system Organic carbon Bulk density Soil fertility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out within the FCT PhD Programme SUSFOR (SFRH/BD/52407/2013). Authors thank to managers of Herdade da Machoqueira do Grou for support with field facilities. The Soil Laboratory staff of the Departamento de Recursos Naturais, Ambiente e Território (DRAT, ISA) is acknowledged for supporting soil analyses.

References

  1. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1990) Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem 22:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APA (2017) Fundo Português de Carbono–Apoio a Projetos Nacionais. https://www.apambiente.pt/index.php?ref=17&subref=162&sub2ref=306&sub3ref=308. Accessed 11 August 2017
  3. Barnhisel R, Bertsch PM (1982) Aluminun. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, Agronomy Monograph 9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 275–300Google Scholar
  4. Belo CC, Coelho IS, Rolo J, Reis P (2014) Agroforestry systems in the Portuguese mainland. Part II: montados, conditions of land use and evolution. Rev Ciênc Agrár 37:122–130Google Scholar
  5. Bilotta GS, Brazier RE, Haygarth PM (2007) The impacts of grazing animals on the quality of soils, vegetation, and surface waters in intensively managed grasslands. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 237–280Google Scholar
  6. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, Agronomy monograph 9, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 363–375Google Scholar
  7. Borges O, Raimundo F, Coutinho J, Gonçalves B, Oliveira I, Martins A, Madeira M (2017) Carbon fractions as indicators of organic matter dynamics in chestnut orchards under different soil management practices. Agrofor Syst 92:301–310Google Scholar
  8. Brady NC, Weil RR (2017) The nature and properties of soils, 15th edn. Pearson Press, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugalho MN, Caldeira MC, Pereira JS, Aronson J, Pausas JG (2011) Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 9:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldeira MC, Lecomte X, David TS, Pinto JG, Bugalho MN, Werner C (2015) Synergy of extreme drought and shrub invasion reduce ecosystem functioning and resilience in water-limited climates. Sci Rep 5:15110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carranca C, Castro IV, Figueiredo N, Redondo R, Rodrigues ARF, Saraiva I, Maricato R, Madeira MAV (2015) Influence of tree canopy on N2 fixation by pasture legumes and soil rhizobial abundance in Mediterranean oak woodlands. Sci Total Environ 506–507:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Correia AC, Costa e Silva F, Correia AV, Hussain MZ, Rodrigues AD, David JS, Pereira JS (2014) Carbon sink strength of a Mediterranean cork oak understorey: how do semi-deciduous and evergreen shrubs face summer drought? J Veg Sci 25:411–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa A, Madeira M, Santos JL, Plieninger T, Seixas J (2014) Fragmentation patterns of evergreen oak woodlands in Southwestern Iberia: identifying key spatial indicators. J Environ Manag 133:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahlgren RA, Singer MJ, Huang X (1997) Oak tree and grazing impacts on soil properties and nutrients in California oak woodland. Biogeochemistry 39:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Leenheer L, Van Hove J (1958) Determination de la teneur en carbone organique des sols. Études critiques des methodes tritrimétriques. Pédologie 8:39–77Google Scholar
  16. Dias FS, Miller DL, Marques TA, Marcelino J, Caldeira MC, Orestes Cerdeira J, Bugalho MN (2016) Conservation zones promote oak regeneration and shrub diversity in certified Mediterranean oak woodlands. Biol Conserv 195:226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egnér Riehm H (1958) Die ammoniumlaktatessigsaüre–Methode zur Bestimmung der Leichtlöslichen Phosphorsäure in Karbonathaltigen Böden. Agrochimica 3:49–65Google Scholar
  18. Eichhorn MP, Paris P, Herzog F, Incoll LD, Liagre F, Mantzanas K, Mayus M, Moreno G, Papanastasis VP, Pilbeam DJ, Pisanelli A, Dupraz C (2006) Silvoarable systems in Europe—past, present and future prospects. Agrofor Syst 67:29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Escribano M, Díaz-Caro C, Mesias FJ (2018) A participative approach to develop sustainability indicators for dehesa agroforestry farms. Sci Total Environ 640–641:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2017) GSP Guidelines for sharing national data/information to compile a global soil organic carbon (GSOC) map. Pillar 4 working group. Version 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. Gómez-Rey MX, Garcês A, Madeira M (2011) Organic C distribution and N mineralization in soil of oak woodlands with improved pastures. Rev Ciênc Agrár 34:80–92Google Scholar
  22. Gómez-Rey MX, Garcês A, Madeira M (2012) Soil organic-C accumulation and N availability under improved pastures established in Mediterranean oak woodlands. Soil Use Manag 28:497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gómez-Rey MX, Madeira M, Gonzalez-Prieto SJ, Coutinho J (2013) Soil C and N dynamics in a Mediterranean oak woodland with shrub encroachment. Plant Soil 371:339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. GPP (2018) Estatísticas Agrícolas. http://www.gpp.pt/index.php/estatisticas-agricolas/estatisticas-agricolas. Accessed 2 October 2018
  25. Haynes RJ (2000) Labile organic matter as an indicator of organic matter quality in arable and pastoral soils in New Zealand. Soil Biol Biochem 32:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Adv Agron 49:119–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hernández-Esteban A, López-Díaz ML, Cáceres Y, Moreno G (2018) Are sown legume-rich pastures effective allies for the profitability and sustainability of Mediterranean dehesas?. Syst, Agrofor.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0307-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houba VJG, Novozamsky I, Temminghoff E (1994) Soil analysis procedures. Department of soil science and plant nutrition, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2015) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change: part of the working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Iqbal J, Hu R, Feng M, Lin S, Malghani S, Ali IM (2010) Microbial biomass, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen strongly affect soil respiration in different land uses: a case study at three Gorges Reservoir area, South China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:294–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014, updated 2015, international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalbitz K, Solinger S, Park J-H, Michalzik B, Matzner E (2000) Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review. Soil Sci 165:277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khanna PK, Ludwig B, Bauhaus J, O’Hara C (2001) Assessment and significance of labile organic C pools in forest soils. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follet R, Stewart BA (eds) Assessment methods for soil carbon. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 167–182Google Scholar
  34. López-Sánchez A, Schroeder J, Roig S, Sobral M, Dirzo R (2014) Effects of Cattle management on oak regeneration in Northern Californian Mediterranean oak woodlands. PLoS ONE 9:e105472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreno G, Obrador JJ (2007) Effects of trees and understory management on soil fertility and nutrient status of holm oaks in Spanish dehesas. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moreno G, Pulido F (2009) The functioning, management and persistence of dehesas. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects, advances in agroforestry. Springer, New York, pp 127–160Google Scholar
  37. Nunes J (2004) Interacção solo–árvore Isolada em montados de azinho (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.): processos fundamentais. Dissertation, Universidade de Évora, ÉvoraGoogle Scholar
  38. Poeplau C, Vos C, Don A (2017) Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content. Soil 3:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pulido M, Schnabel S, Contador JFL, Lozano-Parra J, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á (2017) Selecting indicators for assessing soil quality and degradation in rangelands of Extremadura (SW Spain). Ecol Indic 74:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigues AR, Silva E, Santos G, Coutinho J, Madeira M (2015) Do improved pastures affect enzymatic activity and C and N dynamics in soils of the montado system? Rev Ciênc Agrár 38:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenzweig ST, Carson MA, Baer SG, Blair JM (2016) Changes in soil properties, microbial biomass and fluxes of C and N in soil following post-agricultural grassland restoration. Appl Soil Ecol 100:186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simões MP, Madeira M, Gazarini L (2009) Ability of Cistus L. shrubs to promote soil rehabilitation in extensive oak woodlands of Mediterranean areas. Plant Soil 323:249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simões MP, Belo AF, Fernandes M, Madeira M (2016) Regeneration patterns of Quercus suber according to montado management systems. Agrofor Syst 90:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (2000) Soil macroagregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol Biochem 32:2099–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SNIRH (2017) Dados Base da Rede Meteorológica do SNIRH–Barragem de Montargil (19H/02C), Machoqueira do Grou (19G/01UG). Sist. Nac. Inf. Recur. Hídr, Agência Port. Ambiente IP. http://snirh.apambiente.pt/. Accessed 28 July 2017
  47. SROA (1965) Carta dos solos de Portugal - Folha 31-D (1:50000). Serviço de Reconhecimento e de Ordenamento Agrário, Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  48. Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1999) The problem of experimental design in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 44:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Teixeira RFM, Proença V, Crespo D, Valada T, Domingos T (2015) A conceptual framework for the analysis of engineered biodiverse pastures. Ecol Eng 77:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zbyszewski G (1953) Carta geológica de Portugal—Folha 31-D (1:50000). Serviços Geológicos de Portugal, LisboaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Rodrigues
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Costa e Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. C. Correia
    • 1
  • M. C. Bicho
    • 1
  • M. Madeira
    • 1
  • J. Coutinho
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Estudos FlorestaisInstituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de LisboaTapada da AjudaPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I. POeirasPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia e Ambiente, Escola de Ciências da Vida e AmbienteUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations