Advertisement

Drivers of Psammodromus algirus abundance in a Mediterranean agroforestry landscape

  • Joana FernandesEmail author
  • Francisco Petrucci-Fonseca
  • Margarida Santos-Reis
  • Luís Miguel Rosalino
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Mediterranean European landscapes have been shaped by human activities for centuries, particularly by livestock and farming. Traditionally managed montado landscapes have been recognized as having a crucial role in biodiversity conservation, providing habitat complexity and thus, ecological conditions for a variety of species. Biodiversity associated with montado can only be maintained under specific agricultural practices, with the intensification or abandonment of such practices posing serious threats for wildlife. Despite the high number of reptile species endemic to the Iberian Peninsula, research on the influence of agroforestry management practices on these species has been scarce. The mediterranean lizard Psammodromus algirus is a generalist species that responds to changes in the structure and quality of microhabitats, specifically the shrub layer, which is greatly affects by changes in cattle grazing intensity. In this study, we assessed how grazing affects the frequency of occurrence of P. algirus in a Mediterranean landscape dominated by montado. We detected that areas of intermediate age regarding grazing exclusion support higher lizard abundance, with P. algirus abundance being limited by vegetation structure and solar radiation. Thus, we may infer that the vegetation structure regulatory role of cattle will affect this lizard’s abundance, limiting it indirectly. We suggest that the maintenance of adequate traditional management, allowing the grazing pressure at low to moderate levels, would be beneficial to this species and reptiles in general and conclude that reconciling grazing and reptile conservation is possible if done in a sustainable way.

Keywords

Montado Grazing Shrub management Algerian psammodromus 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out in the frame of a research protocol established between the Companhia das Lezírias, S.A. and the Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c—Lisbon University). LMR thanks the financial support to University of Aveiro (Department of Biology), CESAM (UID/AMB/50017—POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007638), FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC), and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.

References

  1. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2006) Natural oak forest vs. ancient pine plantations: lizard microhabitat use may explain the effects of ancient reforestations on distribution and conservation of Iberian lizards. Biodivers Conserv 16:3409–3422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton K (2014) R package “MuMIn”: Multi-model Inference (version 1.10.5)Google Scholar
  3. Beausoleil NJ, Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ (2004) Methods for marking New Zealand wildlife: amphibians, reptiles, and marine mammals. Department of Conservation, Wellington, p 147Google Scholar
  4. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bignal EM, McCracken DI, Corrie H (1995) Defining European low-intensity farming systems: the nature of farming. In: McCracken DI, Bignal EM, Wenlock SE (eds) Farming on the edge: the nature of traditional farmland in Europe. Joint Nature Conervation Committee, Peterborough, pp 29–37Google Scholar
  6. Blaum N, Rossmanith E, Popp A, Jeltsch F (2007) Shrub encroachment affects mammalian carnivore abundance and species richness in semiarid rangelands. Acta Oecol 31:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blondel J (2006) The ‘design’ of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the historic period. Human Ecol 34:713–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blondel J, Aronson J (1999) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Campos P (1995) Dehesa economy and conservation in the Iberian Peninsula. In: McCracken DI, Bignal EM, Wenlock SE (eds) Farming on the edge: the nature of traditional farmland in Europe. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, pp 112–117Google Scholar
  11. Cano PD, Leynaud GC (2009) Effects of fire and cattle grazing on amphibians and lizards in northeastern Argentina (Humid Chaco). Eur J Wildl Res 56:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carretero MA, Montori A, Llorente GA, Santos X (2004) Psammodromus algirus. In: Pleguezuelos JM, Márquez R, Lizana M (eds) Atlas y libro rojo de los anfíbios y reptiles de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza—Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, pp 260–262Google Scholar
  13. Cheylan M, Grillet P (2005) Statut passé et actuel du lézard ocellé (Lacerta lepida, sauriens, lacertidés) en France. Implication en termes de conservation. Vie et Milieu 55:15–30Google Scholar
  14. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crosswhite DL, Fox SF, Thill RE (1999) Comparison of methods for monitoring reptiles and amphibians in upland forests of the Ouachita Mountains. In: Procuration of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, vol 79. pp 45–50Google Scholar
  16. Demaynadier PG, Hunter ML (1998) Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. Conserv Biol 12:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díaz M, Campos P, Pulido FJ (1997) The Spanish dehesas: a diversity in land-use and wildlife. In: Pain D, Pienkowski M (eds) Farming and birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its implications for bird conservation. Academic Press, London, pp 178–209Google Scholar
  18. Díaz JA, Carbonell R, Virgos E, Santos T, Telleria JL (2000) Effects of forest fragmentation on the distribution of the lizard Psammodromus algirus. Anim Conserv 3:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eccard JA, Walther RB, Milton SJ (2000) How livestock grazing affects vegetation structures and small mammal distribution in the semi-arid Karoo. J Arid Environ 46:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowler J, Cohen L, Jarvis P (1998) Practical Statistics for Field Biology, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. Godinho C, Rabaça JE (2010) Birds like it Corky: the influence of habitat features and management of ‘montados’ in breeding bird communities. Agrofor Syst 82:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godinho S, Santos AP, Sá-Sousa P (2010) Montado management effects on the abundance and conservation of reptiles in Alentejo, Southern Portugal. Agrofor Syst 82:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonçalves P, Alcobia S, Simões L, Santos-Reis M (2011) Effects of management options on mammal richness in a Mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral system. Agrofor Syst 85:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grime JP (1973) Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J Environ Manage 1:151–167Google Scholar
  26. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, McCracken D, Moritz RFA, Niemelä J, Rebane M, Wascher D, Watt A, Young J (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—A review. Agr Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hipólito D, Santos-Reis M, Rosalino LM (2016) Effects of agro-forestry activities, cattle-raising practices and food-related factors in badger sett location and use in Portugal. Mamm Biol 81:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenkins CL, McGarigal K, Gamble LR (2003) Comparative effectiveness of two trapping techniques for surveying the abundance and diversity of reptiles and amphibians along drift fence arrays. Herpetol Rev 34:39–42Google Scholar
  30. Kati V, Foufopoulos J, Ioannidis Y, Papaioannou H, Poirazidis K, Lebrun P (2007) Diversity, ecological structure and conservation of herpetofauna in a Mediterranean area (Dadia National Park, Greece). Amphibia-Reptilia 28:517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Listopad CMCS, Masters RE, Drake J, Weishampel J, Branquinho C (2015) Structural diversity indices based on airborne LiDAR as ecological indicators for managing highly dynamic landscapes. Ecol Ind 57:268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loureiro A, Ferrand de Almeida N, Carretero MA, Paulo OS (2010) Atlas dos anfíbios e répteis de Portugal. Esfera do Caos, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  33. Manel S, Ceri Williams H, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: The need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manley PN, Van Horne B, Roth JK, Zielinski WJ, McKenzie MM, Weller TJ, Weckerly FW, Vojta C (2005) Multiple species inventory and monitoring technical guide. USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, pp 1–193Google Scholar
  35. Martín J, Lopez P (2002) The effect of Mediterranean dehesa management on lizard distribution and conservation. Biol Cons 108:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martín J, López P (1998) Shifts in microhabitat use by the lizard Psammodromus algirus: responses to seasonal changes in vegetation structure. Copeia 1998:780–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDiarmid RW (2012) Reptile biodiversity: standard methods for inventory and monitoring. Univ of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  38. Mott B, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L (2010) Tropical reptiles in pine forests: assemblage responses to plantations and plantation management by burning. For Ecol Manage 259:916–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olea L, Miguel-Ayanz AS (2006) The Spanish dehesa. A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. Grassl Sci Eur 11:3–13Google Scholar
  40. Paracchini ML, Terres J-M, Petersen J-E, Hoogeveen Y (2007) High nature value farmland and traditional agricultural landscapes: open opportunities in the development of rural areas. KNNV Uitgeverij Publishing, Zeist, pp 22–34Google Scholar
  41. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peco B, Sánchez AM, Azcárate FM (2006) Abandonment in grazing systems: consequences for vegetation and soil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 113:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pereira P, Godinho C, Roque I, Marques A, Branco M, Rabaça JE (2012) Time to rethink the management intensity in a Mediterranean oak woodland: the response of insectivorous birds and leaf-chewing defoliators as key groups in the forest ecosystem. Ann For Sci 71:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pérez Soba M, San Miguel A, Elena-Rosselló R (2007) Complexity in the simplicity: the Spanish dehesas. In: Europe’s living landscapes. KNNV Publishing in cooperation with Lanscape Europe, pp 369–384Google Scholar
  45. Pleguezuelos JM, Márquez R, Lizana M (2004) Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza—Asociación Herpetológica Española, MadridGoogle Scholar
  46. Plieninger T (2006) Habitat loss, fragmentation, and alteration—quantifying the impactof land-use changes on a Spanish dehesa landscape by use of aerial photography and GIS. Landsc Ecol 21:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Plieninger T, Wilbrand C (2001) Land use, biodiversity conservation, and rural development in the dehesas of Cuatro Lugares, Spain. Agrofor Syst 51:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  49. Read JL (2002) Experimental trial of Australian arid zone reptiles as early warning indicators of overgrazing by cattle. Austral Ecol 27:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rey Benayas JM, Martins A, Nicolau JM, Schulz JJ (2007) Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev: Perspect Agric, Vet Sci, Nutr Nat Resour 2:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ribeiro R, Santos X, Sillero N, Carretero MA, Llorente GA (2009) Biodiversity and Land uses at a regional scale: is agriculture the biggest threat for reptile assemblages? Acta Oecol 35:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosalino LM, Rosário Jd, Santos-Reis M (2009) The role of habitat patches on mammalian diversity in cork oak agroforestry systems. Acta Oecol 35:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sirami C, Seymour C, Midgley G, Barnard P (2009) The impact of shrub encroachment on savanna bird diversity from local to regional scale. Divers Distrib 15:948–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GRd, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manage 63:337–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stoate C, Araújo M, Borralho R (2003) Conservation of European farmland birds: abundance and species diversity. Ornis Hung 12–13:33–40Google Scholar
  57. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, de Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—a review. J Environ Manage 91:22–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Surová D, Pinto-correia T (2008) Landscape preferences in the cork oak Montado region of Alentejo, southern Portugal: searching for valuable landscape characteristics for different user groups. Landsc Res 33:311–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sutherland WJ (2006) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tárrega R, Calvo L, Taboada Á, García-Tejero S, Marcos E (2009) Abandonment and management in Spanish dehesa systems: effects on soil features and plant species richness and composition. For Ecol Manage 257:731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tietje WD, Vreeland JK (1997) The use of plywood coverboards to sample herpetofauna in a California oak woodland. Trans-West Sect Wildl Soc 33:67–74Google Scholar
  62. Torre I, Díaz M, Martínez-Padilla J, Bonal R, Viñuela J, Fargallo JA (2007) Cattle grazing, raptor abundance and small mammal communities in Mediterranean grasslands. Basic Appl Ecol 8:565–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP (2008) Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Oklahoma, p 720Google Scholar
  64. Wilgers DJ, Horne EA, Sandercock BK, Volkmann AW (2006) Effects of rangeland management on community dynamics of the herpetofauna of the tallgrass prairie. Herpetologica 62:378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woinarski JCZ, Ash AJ (2002) Responses of vertebrates to pastoralism, military land use and landscape position in an Australian tropical savanna. Austral Ecol 27:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zamora-Camacho FJ, Reguera S, Moreno-Rueda G, Pleguezuelos JM (2013) Patterns of seasonal activity in a Mediterranean lizard along a 2200 m altitudinal gradient. J Therm Biol 38:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data, 1st edn. Springer, New York, p 672CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia AnimalFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental ChangesFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia and CESAMUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options