Advertisement

Forage yield, nutritive value and N-fixation ability of legume based swards are affected by light intensity in a Mediterranean agroforestry system

  • Federico Sanna
  • Giovanni Antonio ReEmail author
  • Giovanna Piluzza
  • Giuseppe Campesi
  • Leonardo Sulas
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Mediterranean agroforestry systems, which integrate livestock and/or forage crops might benefit from legume establishment, as a key tool to increase grassland productivity and sustainability. This study is aimed at evaluating the forage performances and N fixation ability of different legume based swards affected by light intensity in a Mediterranean silvopastoral system, where plots in open areas with full sunlight and under tree canopy were identified. Beneath cork oak cover with a partial shade (70% of light interception), aboveground dry matter yield represented 41, 45, 46 and 52% compared to the corresponding values under full sunlight of legume based swards under comparison, namely unsown semi natural pasture, CNR mixture, bladder clover pure sward and Fertiprado mixture, respectively. Crude protein content significantly increased (up to 57%) in partial shade, whereas Neutral Detergent Fiber was not significantly affected by light intensity. Results evidenced that the rates on N derived from the atmosphere by the understory legumes, estimated by 15N isotopic dilution method and using barley as a non-fixing reference species, were about half than the corresponding values obtained under full sunlight. Additionally, partial shade led to longer shoots and wider plant leaf area in several legume species, whereas leaf chlorophyll content were unaffected by light intensity. Photosystem efficiency ratio was also affected by light intensity. Our research quantified clear reductions in N derived from atmosphere rates caused by light reduction under partial shade. Concurrently, results highlight relevant variations in legume plant biomass yield and traits.

Keywords

Agroforestry Understory legumes %Ndfa Partial shade Full sunlight 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr Nino Taras for the kind hospitality in his private farm. We acknowledge Mr Piero Saba, Ms Maddalena Sassu, Mr Daniele Dettori, Mr Anton Pietro Stangoni, Mr Daniele Nieddu and Mr Salvatore Nieddu for the excellent technical assistance in field and in laboratory. This research was partially funded by the FP7 Agforward project (ID 613520).

References

  1. Abraham EM, Kyriazopoulos AP, Parissi ZM, Kostopoulou P, Karatassiou M, Anjalanidou K, Katsouta C (2014) Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments. Agrofor Syst 88(2):287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro RS, Varella AC, Lemaire G, Medeiros RBD, Saibro JCD, Nabinger C, Bangel FV, Carassai IJ (2012) Forage yield and nitrogen nutrition dynamics of warm-season native forage genotypes under two shading levels and in full sunlight. Rev Bras Zootec 41(7):1589–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belesky DP (2005) Growth of Dactylis glomerata along a light gradient in the central Appalachian region of the eastern USA: II. Mechanisms of leaf dry matter production for plants establishing in spring or late summer. Agrofor Syst 65:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Crespo D (2006) The role of legumes on the improvement of grazing resources and the conservation of the “Montado-Dehesa system. In: Abdelguerfi A (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop Diversité des Fabacae fourragères et de leurs symbiotes. Algiers, pp 298–308Google Scholar
  6. Ehret M, Graß R, Wachendorf M (2015) The effect of shade and shade material on white clover/perennial ryegrass mixtures for temperate agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 89(3):557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorio P (2011) Black leaf-clips increased minimum fluorescence emission in clipped leaves exposed to high solar radiation during dark adaptation. Photosynthetica 49(3):371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goh KM, Mansur I, Mead DJ, Sweet GB (1996) Biological nitrogen fixing capacity and biomass production of different understorey pastures in a Pinus radiata-pasture agroforestry system in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 34(1):33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isaac ME, Carlsson G, Ghoulam C, Makhani M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2014) Legume performance and nitrogen acquisition strategies in a tree-based agroecosystem. Agroecol Sust Food 38(6):686–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koukoura Z, Papanastasis P (1996) Establishment and growth of seeded grasses and legumes in pine silvopastoral systems. In: Etienne M (ed) Western European silvopastoral systems. INRA, Paris, pp 83–91Google Scholar
  11. Kyriazopoulos AP, Abraham EM, Parissi ZM, Koukoura Z, Nastis AS (2013) Forage production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata and Trifolium subterraneum mixtures under different shading treatments. Grass Forage Sci 68:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin CH, McGraw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (2001) Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agrofor Syst 53:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahieu S, Metay A, Brunel B, Dufour L (2016) Nitrogen fluxes in chickpea grown in Mediterranean agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 90(2):313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mauro RP, Occhipinti A, Longo AMG, Mauromicale G (2011) Effects of shading on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis of subterranean clover. J Agron Crop Sci 197(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Molongoy K (1992) Technical paper 2: biological nitrogen fixation. The AFNETA alley farming training manual volume. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, IbadanGoogle Scholar
  16. Monti A, Di Virgilio N, Venturi G (2008) Mineral composition and ash content of six major energy crops. Biomass Bioenerg 32(3):216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moreno G, Aviron S, Berg S, Crous-Duran J, Franca A, García de Jalón S, Hartel T, Mirck J, Pantera A, Palma JHN, Paulo JA, Re GA, Sanna F, Thenail C, Varga A, Viaud V, Burgess PJ (2017). Agroforestry systems of high nature and cultural value in Europe: commercial goods and ecosystem services. Agrofor Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0126-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosquera-Losada MR, Moreno G, Pardini A, McAdam GH, Papanastasis V, Burgess PJ, Lamersdorf N, Castro M, Liagre F, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2012) Past, present and future of agroforestry systems in Europe. In: Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry—the future of global land use, advances in agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 285–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nichols PGH, Loi A, Nutt BJ, Evans PM, Craig AD, Pengelly BC, Dear BS, Lloyd DL, Revella CK, Nairh RM, Ewing MA, Howieson JG, Auricht GA, Howie JH, Sandral GA, Carr SJ, de Koning CT, Hackney BF, Crocker GJ, Snowball R, Hughes SJ, Hall EJ, Foster KJ, Skinner PW, Barbetti MJ, You MP (2007) New annual and short-lived perennial pasture legumes for Australian agriculture—15 years of revolution. Field Crops Res 104(1):10–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pang K, Van Sambeek JW, Navarrete-Tindall NE, Lin CH, Jose S, Garrett HE (2017) Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. II. Forage quality and its species-level plasticity. Agrofor Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0068-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peoples MB, Unkovich MJ, Herridge DF (2009) Measuring symbiotic nitrogen fixation by legumes. Nitrogen fixation in crop production’. (Eds D Emerich, H Krishnan) pp, 125-170Google Scholar
  22. Plieninger T, Levers C, Mantel M, Costa A, Schaich H, Kuemmerle T (2015) Patterns and drivers of scattered tree loss in agricultural landscapes: orchard meadows in Germany (1968-2009). PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Querné A, Battie-laclau P, Dufour L, Wery J, Dupraz C (2017) Effects of walnut trees on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of intercropped alfalfa in a Mediterranean agroforestry system. Eur J Agron 84:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reverchon F, Xu Z, Blumfield TJ, Chen C, Abdullah KM (2012) Impact of global climate change and fire on the occurrence and function of understorey legumes in forest ecosystems. J Soils Sediments 12(2):150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salis M, Canu S, Carroni AM, Sulas L (2013) Performances of spontaneous subterranean clover in Mediterranean natural pastures. In: Lombardi G, et al. (Eds) Proceedings of 17th meeting of the FAO-CIHEAM mountain pasture network—pastoralism and ecosystem conservation, 5–7 June 2013, Trivero, Italy, pp 184–187Google Scholar
  26. Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Sulas L, Piluzza G, Salis M, Deligios PA, Ledda L, Canu S (2017) Cropping systems sustainability: inoculation and fertilisation effect on sulla performances in a new cultivation area. Ital J Agron 12(4):315–324Google Scholar
  28. Teixeira RFM, Domingos T, Costa APSV, Oliveira R, Farropas L, Calouro F, Barradas AM, Carneiro JPBG (2011) Soil organic matter dynamics in Portuguese natural and sown grasslands. Ecol Model 222:993–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teixeira RFM, Proenca V, Crespo D, Valada T, Domingos T (2015) A conceptual framework for the analysis of engineered biodiverse pastures. Ecol Eng 77:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Unkovich MJ, Baldock J, Peoples MB (2010) Prospects and problems of simple linear models for estimating symbiotic N2 fixation by crop and pasture legumes. Plant Soil 329:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uzun F (2010) Changes in hay yield and quality of bulbous barley at different phenological stages. Turk J Agric For 34:1–9Google Scholar
  32. Young A (1989) Agroforestry for soil conservation (No. 04; S599. 9. T76, Y68.). CAB international, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhai T, Mohtar RH, Gillespie AR, von Kiparski GR, Johnson KD, Neary M (2006) Modeling forage growth in a Midwest USA silvopastoral system. Agrofor Syst 67(3):243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheIstituto per il Sistema Produzione Animale in Ambiente MediterraneoSassariItaly

Personalised recommendations