Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 93, Issue 6, pp 2037–2046 | Cite as

Sedentarization among nomadic pastoralists of Uganda: which way to feed livestock?

  • Vincent B. MuwanikaEmail author
  • David Nsubuga
  • Dorothy Kalule Nampanzira
  • Fredrick Kabi
  • Charles Masembe
Article

Abstract

Pastoral nomadic communities of East Africa’s drylands are gradually shifting towards a sedentary type of production. However, successful animal production under such settings demands for integrated on-farm management of the various animal feed resources. The objective of this study was to characterize feed resources of goats in the pastoral area of Karamoja sub-region, a dry land area in northeastern Uganda. Structured interviews were conducted involving 300 randomly selected households. Results revealed seventy plant species distributed in 31 families were fed to goats. The species were dominated by browses (trees and shrubs) 54%; herbs 21%; grasses 19%; climbers and hedges 5%. Balanites aegyptica, Grewia similis, Acacia sieberiana, Acalypha fruticosa, Acacia albida and Cadaba farinosa were the most frequently mentioned browse species. Farmers also use these species for other purposes notably building, human and livestock medicine, fencing, firewood and as vegetables during the dry season. Browses were available throughout the year unlike grasses and crop residues that were available seasonally. Since browses were available throughout the year in addition to being multipurpose, it is recommended that current efforts to actualize a sedentary lifestyle among Karamoja pastoralists integrate the planting and management of the most reported browse species in this study.

Keywords

Goats Feed resources Browse Karamoja 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from RUFORUM Grant No.: RU2014GRG091

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexandre G, Mandonnet N (2005) Goat meat production in harsh environments. Small Rumin Res 60:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Masri MR, Zarkawi M (1994) Effects of gamma radiation on chemical composition of some agricultural residues. Radiat Phys Chem 43:257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade-Montemayor HM, Cordova-Torres AV, García-Gasca T, Kawas JR (2011) Alternative foods for small ruminants in semiarid zones, the case of Mesquite (Prosopis laevigata spp.) and Nopal (Opuntia spp.). Small Rumin Res 98:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Stefano A, Jacobson GM (2018) Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Agrofor Syst 92:285–299Google Scholar
  5. Dhillon GS, Van Rees CJK (2017) Soil organic carbon sequestration by shelterbelt agroforestry systems in Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 97(3):394–409Google Scholar
  6. Egeru A, Wasonga O, Kyagulanyi J, Mwanjalolo MGJ, MacOpiyo L, Mburu J (2014) Spatio-temporal dynamics of forage and land cover changes in Karamoja sub-region, Uganda Research. Policy Pract J 4:6 http://www.pastoralismjournal.com/content/4/1/6. Accessed 2 May 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Egeru A, Wasonga O, Mwanjalolo MGJ, MacOpiyo L, Mburu J (2015) Abundance and diversity of native forage species in pastoral Karamoja sub-region, Uganda. Afr Study Monogr 36(4):261–296Google Scholar
  8. Evitayani WL, Fariani A, Ichinohe T, Fujihara T (2004) Seasonal changes in nutritive value of some grass species in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 17:1663–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fahmi MKM, Dafa-Alla DAM, Kanninen M, Luukkanen O (2018) Impact of agroforestry parklands on crop yield and income generation: case study of rainfed farming in the semi-arid zone of Sudan. Agrofor Syst 92:785–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fornara DA, Olave R, Burgess P et al (2018) Land use change and soil carbon pools: evidence from a long-term silvopastoral experiment. Agroforest Syst 92:1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hungwe T, Mutisi C, Mugabe P, Gwazani R (2013) Influence of communal grazing management system on the foraging behavior of steers in a semi-arid area of Zimbabwe. Greener J Agric Sci 3(12):787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (2015) Food and nutrition security and conflict management project report. Karamoja (Uganda). http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full%20Report_883.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2016
  13. Lebbie SHB, Ramsay K (1999) A perspective on conservation and management of small ruminant genetic resources in the sub-Saharan Africa. Small Rumin Res 34:231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mubiru DN (2010) Climate change and adaptation options in karamoja. FAO, EU. http://www.disasterriskreduction.net. Accessed 19 June 2015
  15. Nampanzira DK, Kabasa JD, Nalule A, Nakalembe I, Tabuti JRS (2015) Characterization of the goat feeding system among rural small holder farmers in the semi-arid regions of Uganda. SpringerPlus 4:188.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0961-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramirez RG (1999) Feed resources and feeding techniques of small ruminants under extensive management conditions. Small Rumin Res 34:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shrestha BM, Chang SX, Bork EW, Carlyle CN (2018) Enrichment planting and soil amendments enhance carbon sequestration and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in agroforestry systems: a review. Forests 9:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tabuti JRS, Lye KA (2009) Fodder plants for cattle in Kaliro district, Uganda. Afr Study Monogr 30:161–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ManagementMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda
  2. 2.Department of Livestock and Industrial ResourcesMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda
  3. 3.National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI)WakisoUganda
  4. 4.Department of Zoology, Entomology and Fisheries SciencesMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations