Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 91, Issue 5, pp 795–798 | Cite as

Lessons for research, capacity development and policy in agroforestry for development

  • D. Callo-ConchaEmail author
  • M. Denich
  • M. M. Ul Hassan
  • F. Place
  • D. A. Wardell


Since its foundation in the 1970’s, agroforestry science has evolved from setting its concepts, research approaches and flagship technologies towards its increasing contribution to ecologically sound land use, food security and income generation in the global North and South. The Third World Congress on Agroforestry held in Delhi in April 2014 continued contributed to this evolution by focusing, beyond the scientific realm, on the implementation of findings by convening ad-hoc stakeholders and subjects. Accordingly, some of the congress sessions dealt with key aspects of how agroforestry can foster and contribute to development. The special issue “Lessons for research, capacity development and policy in agroforestry for development” compiles approaches, experiences and overall lessons from (i) research, (ii) capacity development, and (iii) policy-making, capable to promote and generate developmental change through agroforestry. This introductory paper outlines the rationale for the three areas and the contributing articles.


Third World Congress on agroforestry Agroforestry and development Research Capacity development Policy-making 


  1. Conway G, Waage J, Delaney S (2010) Science and innovation for development. UK Collaborative on Development Sciences (UKCDS), LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Crewe E, Axelby R (2012) Anthropology and development: culture, morality and politics in a globalised world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FAO (2013) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda: a guide for decision-makers, by G. Buttoud, in collaboration with Ajayi O, Detlefsen G, Place F, Torquebiau E. Agroforestry Working Paper no. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, p 37Google Scholar
  4. Hornidge AK, Ul Hassan M, Mollinga P (2009) ‘Follow the Innovation’: a joint experimentation & learning approach to transdisciplinary innovation research. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston A, Sasson A (1986) New technologies and development: science and technology as factors of change: impact of recent and foreseeable scientific and technological progress on the evolution of societies, especially in the developing countries. UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  6. OECD-DAC (2000) Donor support for institutional capacity development in environment: lessons learned. Evaluation and Aid Effectiveness 3. OECD-DAC, Paris, p 225Google Scholar
  7. Purnomo H, Achdiawan R, Melati, Irawati RH, Sulthon, Shantiko B, Wardell DA (2014) Value-chain dynamics: strengthening the institutions of small-scale furniture producers to improve their value addition. For Trees Livelihoods. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2013.875279 Google Scholar
  8. Röling N (2009) Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. Int J Agric Sustain 7(2):83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rostow WW (1990) The stages of economic growth: a non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Rousseau J, Gautier D, Wardell DA (2015) Coping with the upheavals of globalization in the value chain of shea: the maintenance and relevance of upstream shea nut supply chain organization in western Burkina Faso. World Dev 66:413–427. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Simmons T (2014) Welcome address third World Congress on Agroforestry. Delhi 10th, 2014Google Scholar
  12. Stamm A (2008) Development studies: development research: Germany’s position in international perspectives. Discussion paper. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, BonnGoogle Scholar
  13. STEPS Centre (2010) Innovation, sustainability, development: a new manifesto. (online).
  14. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2015) UNESCO science report—towards 2030. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Vallejo B, When U (2016) Capacity development evaluation; the challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south. World Dev 79:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Development Research (ZEF)University of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.World Agroforestry CenterNairobiKenya
  3. 3.International Food and Policy Research InstituteWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Center for International Forestry ResearchMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations