Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 149–160 | Cite as

Chemical characterisation of Moringa oleifera (MO) leaves and the apparent digestibility of MO leaf meal-based diets offered to three chicken strains

  • N. A. SebolaEmail author
  • V. Mlambo
  • H. K. Mokoboki
Article

Abstract

The utility of Moringa oleifera leaves as a nutraceutical component of chicken diets depends on the leaves’ chemical composition and in vivo digestibility, parameters that are largely unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the chemical composition of M. oleifera leaves at different stages of maturity as well as the apparent digestibility of M. oleifera leaf meal (MOLM)-based diets when offered to three chicken strains. Tender and mature leaves were separately harvested from 12 individual trees and stored separately for processing and chemical analyses. The leaves were air-dried in a well-ventilated laboratory to constant weight and milled to pass through a 1 mm sieve before being analysed for proximate and mineral components. A mixture of tender and mature leaves was also collected from all the trees and bulked before being similarly processed to produce a bulk leaf meal. The bulk leaf meal was used to dilute a commercial broiler finisher diet at 0 (MOLM0), 25 (MOLM25), 50 (MOLM50), and 100 (MOLM100) g/kg DM, producing four isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets whose digestibility was evaluated in 90-day old Potchefstroom koekoek (PK), Ovambo (OV) and Black Australop (BA) chickens. Crude protein content was significantly higher in tender (324.63 g/kg DM) than in mature (285.2 g/kg DM) leaves. Tender leaves had higher concentrations of Ca (19.15 g/kg) and P (4.15 g/kg). However, Fe content for mature leaves (150.5 dpm) was higher compared to tender leaves (110.5 dpm). The level of phenolics was higher in mature leaves. In BA chickens, the control diet (MOLM0) had highest crude protein digestibility (87.0%) followed by MOLM100 (85.4%). In OV and PK strains, diets with higher levels of MOLM had higher crude protein digestibility. It can be concluded that the inclusion of MOLM in chicken diets did not negatively affect nutrient digestibility in OV and PK chickens, thus there is potential to utilize this feed resource for improved productivity in these extensively-reared chickens.

Keywords

Stage of maturity Moringa oleifera leaves Nutrient digestibility Chemical composition 

References

  1. Acamovic T, Brooker JD (2005) Biochemistry of plant secondary metabolites and their effects in animals. Proc Nutr Soc 64(3):403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (1998) Feed and plant analysis methods. AgriLASA, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammar H, López S, González JS, Ranilla MJ (2004) Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of some Spanish browse plant species. J Sci Food Agric 84:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ammar H, López S, Andrés S (2010) Influence of maturity stage of forage grasses and leguminous on their chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility. J Options Méditerr 84:199–203Google Scholar
  5. AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., pp 807–928 (method number 978.04)Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong WD, Rogler JC, Featherston WR (1974) Effects of tannins extraction on the performance of chicks fed bird resistant sorghum grain diets. Poult Sci 53:714–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arzani H, Basiri M, Khatibi F, Ghorbani G (2006) Nutritive value of some Zagros Mountain rangeland species. Small Rumin Res 65:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassler NR, Buchholz H (1993) Amino acid analysis. Methodenbuch Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln, vol 3. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  9. Callow MN, Lowe KF, Bowdlwer TM, Lowe SA, Gobius NR (2003) Dry matter yield, forage quality and persistence of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) cultivars compared with perennial rye grass (Lolium perenne) in a sub-tropical environment. Aust J Exp Agric 43:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conaghan P, O’kiely P, Howard H, O’mara FP, Halling MA (2008) Evaluation of Lolium perenne L. cv. AberDart and AberDove for silage production. Ir J Agric Food Res 47:119–134Google Scholar
  11. Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Albrecht KA (2009) Yield, nutritive value and silage fermentation of kura clover-reed canarygrass and lucerne herbages in northern USA. Grass Forage Sci 64:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dei HK, Rose SP, Mackenzie AM (2007) Shea nut (Vitellaria paradoxa) meal as a feed ingredient for poultry. World’s Poult Sci J 63:611–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahey J (2005) ‘Moringa oleifera: a review of the medical evidence for its nutritional, therapeutic, and prophylactic properties part 1’. Trees Life J 1(5):1–15Google Scholar
  14. Folin C, Ciocalteu V (1927) Tyrosine and tryptophan determination in protein. J Biol Chem 73:627–650Google Scholar
  15. Glew RS, VanderJagtb DJ, Bosse R, Huang YS, Chuang LT, Glew RH (2005) The nutrient content of three edible plants of the Republic of Niger. J Food Compos Anal 18:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta KB, Barat GK, Wagle DS, Chawla HKL (1989) Nutrient contents and antinutritional factors in conventional and non-conventional leafy vegetables. Food Chem 31:105–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kozat S (2007) Serum T3 and T4 concentrations in lambs with nutritional myodegeneration. J Vet Intern Med 21:1135–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen FM, Moughan PJ, Wilson MN (1993) Dietary fiber viscosity and endogenous protein excretion at the terminal ileum of growing rats. J Nutr 123:1898–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Makkar HPS, Becker K (1996) Nutritional value and antinutritional components of whole and ethanol extracted Moringa oleifera leaves. Anim Feed Sci Tech 63(1–4):211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Makkar HPS, Becker K (1997) Nutrients and antiquality factors in different morphological parts of Moringa oleifera tree. J Agric Sci 128:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin EA, Coolidge AA (1978) Nutrition in action, 4th edn. Holt, R and Wilson Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Mcdonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA (2005) Animal nutrition, 4th edn. Longman Scientific and Technical publishers, New York, pp 200–216Google Scholar
  23. Meda AL, Lamien CE, Compaoré MMY, Meda RNT, Kiendrebeogo M, Zeba B, Millogo JF, Nacoulma OG (2008) Polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of fourteen wild edible fruits from Burkina Faso. Molecules 13:581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merck (2005) Mineral deficiencies. The Merck veterinary manuel, 9th edn. Merck and Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, pp 2320–2330Google Scholar
  25. Mosenthin R, Sauer WC, Ahrens F (1994) Dietary pectin’s effect on ileal and fecal amino acid digestibility and exocrine pancreatic secretions in growing pigs. J Nutr 124:1222–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moyo B, Masika PJ, Hugo A, Muchenje V (2011) Nutritional characterization of Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves. Afric J Biotechnol 1:12925–12933Google Scholar
  27. Muhammad A, Dangoggo SM, Tsafe AI, Itodo AU, Atiku FA (2011) Proximate, minerals and anti-nutritional factors of Gardenia aqualla (Gauden dutse) fruit pulp. Pak J Nutr 6:577–581Google Scholar
  28. Oduro W, Ellis O, Owusu D (2008) Nutritional potential of two leafy vegetables: moringa oleifera and Ipomoea batatas leaves. Sci Res Essay 3:57–60Google Scholar
  29. Porter LJ, Hirstich LN, Chan BG (1986) The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS (2010) SAS user’s guide: statistics, 9th edn. SAS Institute, Inc., RaleighGoogle Scholar
  31. Smit HJ, Tas BM, Taweel HZ, Tamminga S, Elgersma A (2005) Effects of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars on herbage production, nutritional quality and herbage intake of grazing dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci 65:325–334Google Scholar
  32. Sodamade A, Bolaji OS, Adeboye OO (2013) Proximate analysis, mineral contents and functional properties of Moringa oleifera Leaf Protein Concentrate. J Applied Chem 4:47–51Google Scholar
  33. Soetan KO, Oyewole OE (2009) The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti-nutritional factors in animal feeds: a review. Afr J Food Sci 9:223–232Google Scholar
  34. Soliva CR, Kreuzer M, Foidl N, Foidl G, Machmuller A, Hess HD (2005) Feeding value of whole and extracted Moringa oleifera leaves for ruminants and their effects on ruminal fermentation in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Tech 118(1–2):47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sreelatha S, Padma PR (2009) Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Moringa oleifera leaves in two stages of maturity. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 64:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turgut L, Yanar M, Tuzemen N, Tan M, Comakli B (2008) Effect of maturity stage on chemical composition and in situ ruminal degradation kinetics of meadow hay in Awassi sheep. J Anim Vet Adv 7(9):1061–1065Google Scholar
  37. Valente ME, Borreani G, Peiretti PG, Tobacco E (2000) Codified morphological stage for predicting digest-ibility of Italian ryegrass during the spring cycle. Agronomy J 92:967–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang R, Chang L, Hsu J, Weng BBC, Palada MC, Chadha ML, Levasseur V (2006) Nutritional and functional properties of Moringa Leaves from germplasm, to plant, to food, to health. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C, pp 1–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture Science and TechnologyNorth-West UniversityMmabathoSouth Africa
  2. 2.Food Security and Safety Niche Area, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and TechnologyNorth-West UniversityMmabathoSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations